From patchwork Wed Jan 22 23:11:24 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 212980 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A18C32771 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4B42465B for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725972AbgAVXL0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:11:26 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:54191 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725884AbgAVXL0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:11:26 -0500 Received: from 79.184.255.84.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.255.84) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.341) id 5c3577da6efc3ff5; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:11:24 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Chanho Min , Daewoong Kim , Seokjoo Lee , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH] PM: core: Fix handling of devices deleted during system-wide resume Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:11:24 +0100 Message-ID: <2601275.1tEomSadG4@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki If a device is deleted by one of its system-wide resume callbacks (for example, because it does not appear to be present or accessible any more) along with its children, the resume of the children may continue leading to use-after-free errors and other issues (potentially). Namely, if the device's children are resumed asynchronously, their resume may have been scheduled already before the device's callback runs and so the device may be deleted while dpm_wait_for_superior() is being executed for them. The memory taken up by the parent device object may be freed then while dpm_wait() is waiting for the parent's resume callback to complete, which leads to a use-after-free. Moreover, the resume of the children is really not expected to continue after they have been unregistered, so it must be terminated right away in that case. To address this problem, modify dpm_wait_for_superior() to check if the target device is still there in the system-wide PM list of devices and if so, to increment its parent's reference counter, both under dpm_list_mtx which prevents device_del() running for the child from dropping the parent's reference counter prematurely. If the device is not present in the system-wide PM list of devices any more, the resume of it cannot continue, so check that again after dpm_wait() returns, which means that the parent's callback has been completed, and pass the result of that check to the caller of dpm_wait_for_superior() to allow it to abort the device's resume if it is not there any more. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/1579568452-27253-1-git-send-email-chanho.min@lge.com Reported-by: Chanho Min Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/base/power/main.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/main.c @@ -273,10 +273,38 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struc device_links_read_unlock(idx); } -static void dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async) +static bool dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async) { - dpm_wait(dev->parent, async); + struct device *parent; + + /* + * If the device is resumed asynchronously and the parent's callback + * deletes both the device and the parent itself, the parent object may + * be freed while this function is running, so avoid that by reference + * counting the parent once more unless the device has been deleted + * already (in which case return right away). + */ + mutex_lock(&dpm_list_mtx); + + if (!device_pm_initialized(dev)) { + mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx); + return false; + } + + parent = get_device(dev->parent); + + mutex_unlock(&dpm_list_mtx); + + dpm_wait(parent, async); + put_device(parent); + dpm_wait_for_suppliers(dev, async); + + /* + * If the parent's callback has deleted the device, attempting to resume + * it would be invalid, so avoid doing that then. + */ + return device_pm_initialized(dev); } static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async) @@ -621,7 +649,8 @@ static int device_resume_noirq(struct de if (!dev->power.is_noirq_suspended) goto Out; - dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async); + if (!dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async)) + goto Out; skip_resume = dev_pm_may_skip_resume(dev); @@ -829,7 +858,8 @@ static int device_resume_early(struct de if (!dev->power.is_late_suspended) goto Out; - dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async); + if (!dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async)) + goto Out; callback = dpm_subsys_resume_early_cb(dev, state, &info); @@ -944,7 +974,9 @@ static int device_resume(struct device * goto Complete; } - dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async); + if (!dpm_wait_for_superior(dev, async)) + goto Complete; + dpm_watchdog_set(&wd, dev); device_lock(dev);