From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:54 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789943 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F367F13C910; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713359985; cv=none; b=UkBOTHy+c2nCGS8+JMVmE4y2PX/3kTrGO039WaWMuFtk20ey4Bj2qFWddQPhitD4UNoJ1SgiShTFxwNImt6+bcttF3nHEYmpuHdoy32cVK46yVnKgkRrGfpU5YqvZ8Ku/p3y6/LK+LtxvKkL7G80SwMU2jA3cVmP3ltmF3lFHFc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713359985; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eu0fW8/30VJOEI+WpqyuddEmSY62QpF5ImnYsZBUJs0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hqWa5JiPlY1gxTPsmhfnffwObxzd38PvkoSwdLmIwBiVuHXSm81VS+UkX81BVpaVchHac8y3R+faq52Ao4dy0ZYB80ejfvwBsCPXxtLhp3nGwO4kbv3kMGVrgodJnDH5n6lbuEo7A775Bg0I/dgIN25yP8Odu+rqkbIeo/gi/fY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM053y1Zz6H6vR; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:17:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93DE8140C9C; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:19:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:40 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 01/16] ACPI: processor: Simplify initial onlining to use same path for cold and hotplug Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Separate code paths, combined with a flag set in acpi_processor.c to indicate a struct acpi_processor was for a hotplugged CPU ensured that per CPU data was only set up the first time that a CPU was initialized. This appears to be unnecessary as the paths can be combined by letting the online logic also handle any CPUs online at the time of driver load. Motivation for this change, beyond simplification, is that ARM64 virtual CPU HP uses the same code paths for hotplug and cold path in acpi_processor.c so had no easy way to set the flag for hotplug only. Removing this necessity will enable ARM64 vCPU HP to reuse the existing code paths. Leave noisy pr_info() in place but update it to not state the CPU was hotplugged. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: New patch. RFT: I have very limited test resources for x86 and other architectures that may be affected by this change. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 1 - drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 44 ++++++++++----------------------- include/acpi/processor.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 7a0dd35d62c9..7fc924aeeed0 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -216,7 +216,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) * gets online for the first time. */ pr_info("CPU%d has been hot-added\n", pr->id); - pr->flags.need_hotplug_init = 1; out: cpus_write_unlock(); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c index 67db60eda370..55782eac3ff1 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Diefenbaugh"); MODULE_DESCRIPTION("ACPI Processor Driver"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); -static int acpi_processor_start(struct device *dev); static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev); static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = { @@ -47,7 +46,6 @@ static struct device_driver acpi_processor_driver = { .name = "processor", .bus = &cpu_subsys, .acpi_match_table = processor_device_ids, - .probe = acpi_processor_start, .remove = acpi_processor_stop, }; @@ -115,12 +113,10 @@ static int acpi_soft_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) * CPU got physically hotplugged and onlined for the first time: * Initialize missing things. */ - if (pr->flags.need_hotplug_init) { + if (!pr->flags.previously_online) { int ret; - pr_info("Will online and init hotplugged CPU: %d\n", - pr->id); - pr->flags.need_hotplug_init = 0; + pr_info("Will online and init CPU: %d\n", pr->id); ret = __acpi_processor_start(device); WARN(ret, "Failed to start CPU: %d\n", pr->id); } else { @@ -167,9 +163,6 @@ static int __acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device) if (!pr) return -ENODEV; - if (pr->flags.need_hotplug_init) - return 0; - result = acpi_cppc_processor_probe(pr); if (result && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS)) dev_dbg(&device->dev, "CPPC data invalid or not present\n"); @@ -185,32 +178,21 @@ static int __acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device) status = acpi_install_notify_handler(device->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY, acpi_processor_notify, device); - if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) - return 0; + if (!ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { + result = -ENODEV; + goto err_thermal_exit; + } + pr->flags.previously_online = 1; - result = -ENODEV; - acpi_processor_thermal_exit(pr, device); + return 0; +err_thermal_exit: + acpi_processor_thermal_exit(pr, device); err_power_exit: acpi_processor_power_exit(pr); return result; } -static int acpi_processor_start(struct device *dev) -{ - struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(dev); - int ret; - - if (!device) - return -ENODEV; - - /* Protect against concurrent CPU hotplug operations */ - cpu_hotplug_disable(); - ret = __acpi_processor_start(device); - cpu_hotplug_enable(); - return ret; -} - static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev) { struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(dev); @@ -279,9 +261,9 @@ static int __init acpi_processor_driver_init(void) if (result < 0) return result; - result = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, - "acpi/cpu-drv:online", - acpi_soft_cpu_online, NULL); + result = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, + "acpi/cpu-drv:online", + acpi_soft_cpu_online, NULL); if (result < 0) goto err; hp_online = result; diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h index 3f34ebb27525..e6f6074eadbf 100644 --- a/include/acpi/processor.h +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct acpi_processor_flags { u8 has_lpi:1; u8 power_setup_done:1; u8 bm_rld_set:1; - u8 need_hotplug_init:1; + u8 previously_online:1; }; struct acpi_processor { From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:55 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789374 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBE0128811; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360015; cv=none; b=opPmzLAUHPhKOcnkTeAEttsttipul64qmapOu7M8vkx5r6lQcQFJcHcexEZEbwmKiWTPhlEh3Am2CYGkYDvc45GGLofTFVEBQeJffIYC2i1iZgeVWmBC97rmHiwvvthQyXwsvJTeBlAVRlB9wzGul2kL+RFMStPrNn7aM9iheCY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OE5D9svpO9h2mfxY6/5WWLZuqqED0xt/5KBmUyCYLE8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gtLBdGG9wrt9tsViaomQMD4L+mxju6QHdfQ0D1LxlkvpdKfkbGGJ52YVwp48tB+boSmuojlFb1loKyxJp8EaLV+3H2fyc6w004sFelTXoTktjQEZ/zFbGHXSaUuQRn6nABgrGUPxKlZv6Fyc+8XOZ9A97YejCUOY1x0orBi7b+o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKLxG4XjVz6K7KY; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:15:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C021408FE; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:20:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:20:11 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 02/16] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) For arm64 the CPU registration cannot complete until the ACPI interpreter us up and running so in those cases the arch specific arch_register_cpu() will return -EPROBE_DEFER at this stage and the registration will be attempted later. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: tags --- drivers/base/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index 56fba44ba391..b9d0d14e5960 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void __init cpu_dev_register_generic(void) for_each_present_cpu(i) { ret = arch_register_cpu(i); - if (ret) + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) pr_warn("register_cpu %d failed (%d)\n", i, ret); } } From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:56 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789942 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42738128811; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360046; cv=none; b=MdkdGZNgxH850nG/K0y7d9wpACEsZsgm1ey7xz3lr7/fiOYGI8wjbGd61y9ffzn5UY/6/14ANA2OZSGl1c2EwQI/CUCEwmiX1GLVix99JzSNyxoTdWa/63IGRA+0AlSjaGqW8CHhBDka7b50BCRaw6aR1jMzIgq6ie17frrVhJQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360046; c=relaxed/simple; bh=YchgKnV3IT6htKBpeyILRBdrB6Ktw5Mcs9t4BqnEwcc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QhJQrdS8YIDwhP8aliuPWRNKpN+x6b5icEgT+1m0WcXhUYomn1OnDCePQemIIstrq5CBNhQqCnlVXsuvVQfegVtMyQt61WvUVVZFFh/TEMpnt/BInWC4UIW8CSwF8/XirJJqHM9h63q/6PISAYsJwNBM18lmgp9GbEche+PiGqw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKLxs1qWhz6K7JW; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:15:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C78140D26; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:20:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:20:42 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 03/16] ACPI: processor: Drop duplicated check on _STA (enabled + present) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) The ACPI bus scan will only result in acpi_processor_add() being called if _STA has already been checked and the result is that the processor is enabled and present. Hence drop this additional check. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: New patch to drop this unnecessary code. Now I think we only need to explicitly read STA to print a warning in the ARM64 arch_unregister_cpu() path where we want to know if the present bit has been unset as well. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 7fc924aeeed0..ba0a6f0ac841 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -186,17 +186,11 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) { - unsigned long long sta; - acpi_status status; int ret; if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) return -ENODEV; - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)) - return -ENODEV; - cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:57 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789373 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1C913DDA0; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360077; cv=none; b=EEbUAvb4cHl66Pzyyx8dJiHqBmvWyw0ITW5Ck0ZDgesp5DPpInqRkPqrsA3ffea9ciVOs6WGd2zPyGyhZgBljv2Zz/+zuWZWd2NxrOLNZ0G8z916Rt6ei5ibIKAayO2qLeduRoK0LiGZirf5KMUNv7iujTaXs6pk6FMiCIGeL8o= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360077; c=relaxed/simple; bh=po6Hc5e1p+MvPE/nWcSH1E+iwLSt7JRmOnwakjjl7jE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eIxXbgyZMIH2WIRiOjUy9ShDdyg1vaZAo0Vqn8cu2H7DAaaQy6Fb1aKkEk7WF0tIO2Tfcit2TF6pUpMGHKTXfDN5fmPBU6Q0IuzCDB5zU6MiZv4CvhvOyZyHxERgFq8h+wc4MMDYx0EYXW3wYXTnWeKZbJNrmQoi9wScarhl9xA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKLyR2Xwrz6K7JW; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:16:15 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 660BC140CF4; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:21:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:21:12 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 04/16] ACPI: processor: Move checks and availability of acpi_processor earlier Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Make the per_cpu(processors, cpu) entries available earlier so that they are available in arch_register_cpu() as ARM64 will need access to the acpi_handle to distinguish between acpi_processor_add() and earlier registration attempts (which will fail as _STA cannot be checked). Reorder the remove flow to clear this per_cpu() after arch_unregister_cpu() has completed, allowing it to be used in there as well. Note that on x86 for the CPU hotplug case, the pr->id prior to acpi_map_cpu() may be invalid. Thus the per_cpu() structures must be initialized after that call or after checking the ID is valid (not hotplug path). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: As per discussion in v5 thread, don't use the cpu->dev and make this data available earlier by moving the assignment checks int acpi_processor_get_info(). --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index ba0a6f0ac841..2c164451ab53 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -184,7 +184,35 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} /* Initialization */ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); + +static void acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) +{ + BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); + /* + * Buggy BIOS check. + * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. + * Don't trust it blindly + */ + if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { + dev_warn(&device->dev, + "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", + pr->id); + /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ + return; + } + /* + * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS + * checks. + */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; +} + +static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { int ret; @@ -198,6 +226,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (ret) goto out; + acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); + ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); if (ret) { acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); @@ -217,7 +247,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) return ret; } #else -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr, + struct acpi_device *device) { return -ENODEV; } @@ -232,6 +263,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_status status = AE_OK; static int cpu0_initialized; unsigned long long value; + int ret; acpi_processor_errata(); @@ -316,10 +348,12 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. */ if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); + ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device); if (ret) - return ret; + goto err; + } else { + acpi_processor_set_per_cpu(pr, device); } /* @@ -357,6 +391,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) arch_fix_phys_package_id(pr->id, value); return 0; + +err: + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + return ret; } /* @@ -365,8 +403,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * (cpu_data(cpu)) values, like CPU feature flags, family, model, etc. * Such things have to be put in and set up by the processor driver's .probe(). */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void *, processor_device_array); - static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, const struct acpi_device_id *id) { @@ -395,28 +431,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, if (result) /* Processor is not physically present or unavailable */ return 0; - BUG_ON(pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids); - - /* - * Buggy BIOS check. - * ACPI id of processors can be reported wrongly by the BIOS. - * Don't trust it blindly - */ - if (per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != NULL && - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) != device) { - dev_warn(&device->dev, - "BIOS reported wrong ACPI id %d for the processor\n", - pr->id); - /* Give up, but do not abort the namespace scan. */ - goto err; - } - /* - * processor_device_array is not cleared on errors to allow buggy BIOS - * checks. - */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = device; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = pr; - dev = get_cpu_device(pr->id); if (!dev) { result = -ENODEV; @@ -469,15 +483,16 @@ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) device_release_driver(pr->dev); acpi_unbind_one(pr->dev); - /* Clean up. */ - per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; - per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; - cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); /* Remove the CPU. */ arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id); + + /* Clean up. */ + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + acpi_unmap_cpu(pr->id); cpus_write_unlock(); From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:58 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789941 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F8D713EFEC; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:21:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360109; cv=none; b=NdUAWRs37qMHqeMcKlFiCdD8wGx8+a4VHH9sDKlZCBrJ+urqSOLvvVqmHR+5lsQJWQSJHaSomKSbbLr20QoJNFC0Y29u1auKYLxA3tGKHQW8+1Xe8b6NI5BAJflvuQdoDrf36KHS3LeA6ML5Ay1VSqlKrT+VCYB3GiKPNSEwRpw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360109; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eKBYCEzsU41Xo7w+LoEtv+RyLGHoOc4XkmKqALxnhfQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cT7RuC0XC+KTlRZQnipIUCdmNLQV4l1MQRk1xFShSFLgURr8fzi0nboxvhpciKH11hzGVUsPEMPi5Gc5ctbKntuNsIwwEP6TQb+L2j3lXN7aEfa+ML8MhfAyAWef9d6RqjOovIGxfEaI0U84nwxsVIXiwMR0Bt1qHnOHj+nu4fY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM2S48bZz6JBLj; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:19:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0FD140A08; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:21:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:21:43 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 05/16] ACPI: processor: Add acpi_get_processor_handle() helper Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) If CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR provide a helper to retriever the acpi_handle for a given CPU allowing access to methods in DSDT. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: New patch --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 10 ++++++++++ include/linux/acpi.h | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 2c164451ab53..7ecb13775d7f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -35,6 +35,16 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors); struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(errata); +acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu) +{ + acpi_handle handle = NULL; + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);; + + if (pr) + handle = pr->handle; + + return handle; +} static int acpi_processor_errata_piix4(struct pci_dev *dev) { u8 value1 = 0; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 34829f2c517a..9844a3f9c4e5 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -309,6 +309,8 @@ int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu); #endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ +acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu); + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_IOAPIC int acpi_get_ioapic_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base, u64 *phys_addr); #endif @@ -1077,6 +1079,11 @@ static inline bool acpi_sleep_state_supported(u8 sleep_state) return false; } +static inline acpi_handle acpi_get_processor_handle(int cpu) +{ + return NULL; +} + #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */ extern void arch_post_acpi_subsys_init(void); From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:18:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789372 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5C0A13DDB4; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360138; cv=none; b=gfW4vC1Gaevgv2Dwa2v4G/AgvZDqShIVmcTDpn3XYlvO1IjoG+727yvw+sRUXKS/z0CMYnNiy77LPLRM7JhP2opuy4kYpGSTPdXu09seGjizJHW9aNH80inqDFrsr9sssl83GxVHqdV/3RXoZUr48SCCKoS72KIwdffvm/yygqA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360138; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q9rgmuhSWFWOIBpDyuBLJUfTWRpK6MQ/Ah9Dl96hfnk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JD6NNW0XJljlKfvmPm7jvblf+WtIGh8BNzotDJJgIzBRQ9FYHejp8TS/B3qoi2DrUQScW/lqTd1RhrUZgnMENxVKhQIP8JHfTsAu/cM0fDl/SYy4+3meaNUaNgprN53ePCwV0gypgJfLJ9wRKG01lcvVdWhJHRlrEWGC18MzbKY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM325X8Hz6H7hk; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:20:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07C9140B38; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:22:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:22:14 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 06/16] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can be evaluated. If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has not yet been added so for now this will be called for the original hotplug case. For architectures that do not defer until the ACPI Processor driver loads (e.g. x86), for initially present CPUs there will already be a CPU device. If present do not try to register again. Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu() will not have deferred registration when first called. This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(), while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier. Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this specific case. [PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP. https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ e.g. 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES") Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Joanthan Cameron --- v6: Squash the two paths for conventional CPU Hotplug and arm64 vCPU HP. v5: Update commit message to make it clear this is moving the init back to where it was until very recently. No longer change the condition in the earlier registration point as that will be handled by the arm64 registration routine deferring until called again here. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 7ecb13775d7f..0cac77961020 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -356,8 +356,18 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * * NOTE: Even if the processor has a cpuid, it may not be present * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. + * + * Note this allows 3 flows, it is up to the arch_register_cpu() + * call to reject any that are not supported on a given architecture. + * A) CPU becomes present. + * B) Previously invalid logical CPU ID (Same as becoming present) + * C) CPU already present and now being enabled (and wasn't registered + * early on an arch that doesn't defer to here) */ - if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { + if ((!invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) && cpu_present(pr->id) && + !get_cpu_device(pr->id)) || + invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || + !cpu_present(pr->id)) { ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr, device); if (ret) From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789940 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4C6513C689; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360169; cv=none; b=Dw4JDbDJcb6cWr2dq/6lDWt13hESClf+Ar0KCxuSgewlDZhIDXjlJJPVCnydHz02aywj8BYwQPe3b3nWJvBMet3J/2R4o3jJ/7bHxjMITnuZXO8POlsB6lUV+o6jUlg8N5HRTXKC41CYlsMQz/fQ9+4wKUNSncvP8G6oMNjVz3k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360169; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+y77+7QZby+LVdmrVnp+NoTqJPrXhj6o2AOLhNYOMfg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KGf5FqhAwddrzDPQJD5Av7z8lm1wKfOYBV/QeJ8EfjzFKGwkYgDwIDRAHiijierjjO9V0T9cOjR27Nmk7eYaSrMs7pCUKBDx+Wepw2xSy6ISeMHGXpMVLrWeTu7XOo7Kf9lp80dZExDrNLqFoLKtkvKkSBQRrBL8Amb2mR9/i+E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM0C6Nc2z6K7GV; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:17:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8333E140C9C; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:22:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:22:44 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 07/16] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for acpi_scan_check_and_detach(); Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a uintptr_t of flags into acpi_scan_check_and detach() so that additional flags can be added to indicate whether to defer portions of the eject flow. The new flag follows in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: Based on internal feedback switch to less invasive change to using flags rather than a struct. v5: New patch resulting from rebase. - Internal review suggested we could also do this with flags so I'm looking for feedback on which option people find more readable. --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 17 ++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index d1464324de95..1ec9677e6c2d 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -244,13 +244,16 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device) return 0; } -static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) +#define ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS BIT(0) + +static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) { struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler; + uintptr_t flags = (uintptr_t)p; - acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check); + acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p); - if (check) { + if (flags & ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS) { acpi_bus_get_status(adev); /* * Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled @@ -288,7 +291,9 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true); + uintptr_t flags = ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS; + + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags); } static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) @@ -2601,7 +2606,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan); */ void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL); + uintptr_t flags = 0; + + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim); From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789371 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2076D13DDD5; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:23:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360199; cv=none; b=O9l+rjwqYSftOsEom9m0Dgm6rhhPGyZk4BC0sowNYs3RgYQTOEybMyz4H+1uqoxMnIMQYOro76hQiFXiFktcwhEt/CAmBZqjVb52D8kcEBgCMCT3hzSZPw5vEZwZ06uREbktB8+ZgnC9CHWouKdsgnviIj5qhtGKylh1PMjXwf0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360199; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+Jx9cNmLoL9x+obwBWDlZTUT/Z2SQ/NbSE9pmLzfaCE=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Cmkh/88ykRGW42ogl8qg7nnGfDuJHfaKdYvbsk+oUMAGP3p6zEHSmgrQ+YQwaQ4zBRiHpW9qpLBami8zEyHjgrXUS3G55bJH2BGoJBXudOTeETgkVdICt6iwWozsZUmIrVZv1zYAM9quM8YmWqPurf8zfdphIV9ErRRjAtDRdkY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM0p4104z6K8jS; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:18:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B3B140B38; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:23:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:23:15 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 08/16] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse struct acpi_scan_handler has a detach callback that is used to remove a driver when a bus is changed. When interacting with an eject-request, the detach callback is called before _EJ0. This means the ACPI processor driver can't use _STA to determine if a CPU has been made not-present, or some of the other _STA bits have been changed. acpi_processor_remove() needs to know the value of _STA after _EJ0 has been called. Add a post_eject callback to struct acpi_scan_handler. This is called after acpi_scan_hot_remove() has successfully called _EJ0. Because acpi_scan_check_and_detach() also clears the handler pointer, it needs to be told if the caller will go on to call acpi_bus_post_eject(), so that acpi_device_clear_enumerated() and clearing the handler pointer can be deferred. An extra flag is added to flags field introduced in the previous patch to achieve this. Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Joanthan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ---- v6: - Switch to flags. Russell, you hadn't signed off on this when posting last time. Do you want to insert a suitable tag now? v5: - Rebase to take into account the changes to scan handling in the meantime. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 4 ++-- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 0cac77961020..0e43f5b4267a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Removal */ -static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) +static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = { .ids = processor_device_ids, .attach = acpi_processor_add, #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU - .detach = acpi_processor_remove, + .post_eject = acpi_processor_post_eject, #endif .hotplug = { .enabled = true, diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 1ec9677e6c2d..3ec54624664a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device) } #define ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_STATUS BIT(0) +#define ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_EJECT BIT(1) static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) { @@ -273,8 +274,6 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) if (handler) { if (handler->detach) handler->detach(adev); - - adev->handler = NULL; } else { device_release_driver(&adev->dev); } @@ -284,6 +283,28 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) */ acpi_device_set_power(adev, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD); adev->flags.initialized = false; + + /* For eject this is deferred to acpi_bus_post_eject() */ + if (!(flags & ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_EJECT)) { + adev->handler = NULL; + acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev); + } + return 0; +} + +static int acpi_bus_post_eject(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used) +{ + struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler; + + acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_post_eject, NULL); + + if (handler) { + if (handler->post_eject) + handler->post_eject(adev); + + adev->handler = NULL; + } + acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev); return 0; @@ -301,6 +322,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_handle handle = device->handle; unsigned long long sta; acpi_status status; + uintptr_t flags = ACPI_SCAN_CHECK_FLAG_EJECT; if (device->handler && device->handler->hotplug.demand_offline) { if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(device, true)) @@ -313,7 +335,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Ejecting\n"); - acpi_bus_trim(device); + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(device, (void *)flags); acpi_evaluate_lck(handle, 0); /* @@ -336,6 +358,8 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) } else if (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED) { acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject incomplete - status 0x%llx\n", sta); + } else { + acpi_bus_post_eject(device, NULL); } return 0; diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index e7796f373d0d..51a4b936f19e 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct acpi_scan_handler { bool (*match)(const char *idstr, const struct acpi_device_id **matchid); int (*attach)(struct acpi_device *dev, const struct acpi_device_id *id); void (*detach)(struct acpi_device *dev); + void (*post_eject)(struct acpi_device *dev); void (*bind)(struct device *phys_dev); void (*unbind)(struct device *phys_dev); struct acpi_hotplug_profile hotplug; From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:02 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789939 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0399913E043; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360231; cv=none; b=maJQRWJiZHVQ6OA7mknvNoXRWpI4dXpgVizcTlBOyEb/Ic3YShLoCAwKd6RHd1TFE7iEz5vmzzDZj6r0cJGhLzu83M5c9wUpRM24PNvtNi08G+yqrO+FUqwEPQNAN5eYOq+FbmFism5zHOmF7oaznLSdBV0KpxXTtzjbMlwX55M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360231; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9mGJNdyfuwjTBks5shFKIm3vZg8DUGFCba/ALWdO2Rw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iWOs9dRKHziEaOB5df3+A0hKUWoiT9BQbnThUq4+u7C3OVnyevEyPiLGMPkczeegRiaBz78juoVocI9L9ooC2feeNcnQQt9BxyprR5Iw4ybuRJPEuJ9mSKSTWUWR36h2xDMKk5LU8Td/AVuzXdfSbFovmkf/6lgecgB8WoZtMtw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM1P1JlCz6K8qw; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:18:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C226E140A08; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:23:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:23:46 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 09/16] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse ACPI identifies CPUs by UID. get_cpu_for_acpi_id() maps the ACPI UID to the Linux CPU number. The helper to retrieve this mapping is only available in arm64's NUMA code. Move it to live next to get_acpi_id_for_cpu(). Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 11 ----------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h index 6792a1f83f2a..bc9a6656fc0c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -119,6 +119,17 @@ static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu) return acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid; } +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid) +{ + int cpu; + + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) + if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu)) + return cpu; + + return -EINVAL; +} + static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { } void __init acpi_init_cpus(void); int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c index e51535a5f939..0c036a9a3c33 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -34,17 +34,6 @@ int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) return acpi_early_node_map[cpu]; } -static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid) -{ - int cpu; - - for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) - if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu)) - return cpu; - - return -EINVAL; -} - static int __init acpi_parse_gicc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end) { From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789370 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C710613C910; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360261; cv=none; b=AeipUeiCZIcDKBiL7BueHGNrdpqYjnSODlXcujaRdz/lIbWurR1yv/2KS1ThW2rrYEOQd5fbG0R8DQgzU6VsQrZ+L5jZwTKuUXqFlu/PYEIhUa6z48GSBmdp0vKO1hZ6q/e+FlAekUICoFIqAAPIhyx1b/lg0jmCneuseDEmvCE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360261; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dmhJWSD9xv9dYuU9/FWuiIHdAi7HU4yHvwTLrzYdN34=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jljGsNs9GZzf2UzbJ65/IagiF1y3+gXO4yFZdAHYNJDzcbimZfmB7ICSM5VWxFhOO12vo1z8E2iWGYftezuN7+QJuO+qYSzBSxRBwC+KLVTim03TH95Go8zrvmpJ5zt4c11WTMYAj4qVvgnlFx8Q7bKiusCWd+3vrfRU0ZCAM4k= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM2009D3z6K8qc; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:19:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2378140A46; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:24:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:24:17 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 10/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-11-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse gic_acpi_match_gicc() is only called via gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(). It should only count the number of enabled redistributors, but it also tries to sanity check the GICC entry, currently returning an error if the Enabled bit is set, but the gicr_base_address is zero. Adding support for the online-capable bit to the sanity check will complicate it, for no benefit. The existing check implicitly depends on gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions() previous failing to find any GICR regions (as it is valid to have gicr_base_address of zero if the redistributors are described via a GICR entry). Instead of complicating the check, remove it. Failures that happen at this point cause the irqchip not to register, meaning no irqs can be requested. The kernel grinds to a panic() pretty quickly. Without the check, MADT tables that exhibit this problem are still caught by gic_populate_rdist(), which helpfully also prints what went wrong: | CPU4: mpidr 100 has no re-distributor! Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 6fb276504bcc..10af15f93d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2415,19 +2415,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means * GICR base is presented via GICC */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) { + if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; - return 0; - } - /* - * It's perfectly valid firmware can pass disabled GICC entry, driver - * should not treat as errors, skip the entry instead of probe fail. - */ - if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) - return 0; - - return -ENODEV; + return 0; } static int __init gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(void) From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:04 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789938 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE9B13EFEF; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360292; cv=none; b=EgKuWh2/Os3bJikbrPnfr8cQSDIFHQsj9GBdfVNSVbhfeAQBhY/UqpFmP+4M1rbFEra8jbLJiPmta5xdNGb2nEvdY8zgbj73MYo9MaESIU6pi8dngjXiPYt8FEiomHOkgTyEFy+AHO5pwzWgW33XAIgPb7OJGh1SaHOT0np3Uvc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360292; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zAPte4ncf56IvnReb/VYq+RT45jYBDRCK8Tgm4y9Dpc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uQLMzccEux4k2iElBHeBP9JEMntvnHK61Gq3lmbej5x6DcuKo0eEtz2diV/rlM/2dNfOxYpZK+i45JrmL+sgswp1yFsuCZOc4E18rpxY9LiquD8oa8PVtcZPvxo0EvlV12wZH5fxYln9FPmUc0ciCBGovU6kSkVxN+Wu0TCJII0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM601sW8z6H7xl; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:22:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EAC140A08; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:24:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:24:47 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 11/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-12-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse To support virtual CPU hotplug, ACPI has added an 'online capable' bit to the MADT GICC entries. This indicates a disabled CPU entry may not be possible to online via PSCI until firmware has set enabled bit in _STA. This means that a "usable" GIC is one that is marked as either enabled, or online capable. Therefore, change acpi_gicc_is_usable() to check both bits. However, we need to change the test in gic_acpi_match_gicc() back to testing just the enabled bit so the count of enabled distributors is correct. What about the redistributor in the GICC entry? ACPI doesn't want to say. Assume the worst: When a redistributor is described in the GICC entry, but the entry is marked as disabled at boot, assume the redistributor is inaccessible. The GICv3 driver doesn't support late online of redistributors, so this means the corresponding CPU can't be brought online either. Clear the possible and present bits. Systems that want CPU hotplug in a VM can ensure their redistributors are always-on, and describe them that way with a GICR entry in the MADT. When mapping redistributors found via GICC entries, handle the case where the arch code believes the CPU is present and possible, but it does not have an accessible redistributor. Print a warning and clear the present and possible bits. Signed-off-by: James Morse Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No Change. --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/acpi.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 10af15f93d4d..66132251c1bb 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2363,11 +2363,25 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; u32 reg = readl_relaxed(acpi_data.dist_base + GICD_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK; u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2; + int cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(gicc->uid); void __iomem *redist_base; if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) return 0; + /* + * Capable but disabled CPUs can be brought online later. What about + * the redistributor? ACPI doesn't want to say! + * Virtual hotplug systems can use the MADT's "always-on" GICR entries. + * Otherwise, prevent such CPUs from being brought online. + */ + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) { + pr_warn_once("CPU %u's redistributor is inaccessible: this CPU can't be brought online\n", cpu); + set_cpu_present(cpu, false); + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false); + return 0; + } + redist_base = ioremap(gicc->gicr_base_address, size); if (!redist_base) return -ENOMEM; @@ -2413,9 +2427,12 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, /* * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means - * GICR base is presented via GICC + * GICR base is presented via GICC. The redistributor is only known to + * be accessible if the GICC is marked as enabled. If this bit is not + * set, we'd need to add the redistributor at runtime, which isn't + * supported. */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) + if (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 9844a3f9c4e5..fcfb7bb6789e 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt); static inline bool acpi_gicc_is_usable(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc) { - return gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED; + return gicc->flags & (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | + ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE); } /* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */ From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789369 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47EF013F00A; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360324; cv=none; b=YMIgcT07+Viz/r+uWuQtVo31yb+uKcfU1Jp1NpdOPwagy6DRpapKU+opPyZQaAanf+f7nfNazU/GDjkNpqpkaVZ1UamBXxSJM5Jj4DjlgRybQu5VWfoLlSB8Dts+hA73qXXJDab2iHtuTt+fVsp0PB33xxPFwyZcHom1ts6K7RQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360324; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Sc4/QQMpboLSwi8LX/TNfgEscS/XcoKFrynL6Fxk/lc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OuH9VdvWPEiCXGEXLVJjO4LMDUKTICYH1WvlnD5XE5j7MZDYMjL94QfaE+koZLddRa+R2152KXfuFaPp5VclpJB/NKWpQDxdI/av1ze5p2/IFCu3HMuUmn5ZWTjc5KT1igtC6U1s5HwAf192I/HpiMo7j+zymlgDiDDbc0lXh1I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM392G0tz6K8jS; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:20:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D4D140B38; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:25:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:25:18 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 12/16] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: Jean-Philippe Brucker When a CPU is marked as disabled, but online capable in the MADT, PSCI applies some firmware policy to control when it can be brought online. PSCI returns DENIED to a CPU_ON request if this is not currently permitted. The OS can learn the current policy from the _STA enabled bit. Handle the PSCI DENIED return code gracefully instead of printing an error. See https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/f/?lang=en page 58. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker [ morse: Rewrote commit message ] Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c index 29a8e444db83..fabd732d0a2d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu) { phys_addr_t pa_secondary_entry = __pa_symbol(secondary_entry); int err = psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), pa_secondary_entry); - if (err) + if (err && err != -EPERM) pr_err("failed to boot CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, err); return err; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index 4ced34f62dab..dc0e0b3ec2d4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) /* Now bring the CPU into our world */ ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle); if (ret) { - pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); + if (ret != -EPERM) + pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); return ret; } From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789937 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ED0A140395; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:25:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360353; cv=none; b=USEQqu+wgUahIEBLmsdAXJFRiNSKt//CEkoiA/MH4Ep0GtMVLCw+talkOdUpRXknJ4DfBo9Cz9IxCJRAWc8KVYy23p+sl+6u/hlf9bEqmbnoL18vNkkRDMqQgsGbHvMOrkHm2KAiYdSTMMX3s9p0ZI2rB6423JsbGuJ4HQUcHqs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360353; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XmbkzAVE4AQabf0zIm/8TJPsYrckFrjybtAvwkNiyDk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nxc7BZu9RyO1daQc6aA7OpsXJnD5VRR0WVav7UbMzeawdY1tG1LqmUjkMVMiiCi8Vu1Jl6eBeozibpzdxjeI7IGFWiKsUelc/RJRbgaPMYqqdkXvfqw3I8PCo6l7AkP5aCazT6c2dhjFeKFUZTp74rzmhwTIlQnYUvW/fihYKmU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM7963CTz6JBH2; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:23:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57011408FE; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:25:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:25:49 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 13/16] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to check if an ACPI handle is now available. Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-14-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) The ARM64 architecture does not support physical CPU HP today. To avoid any possibility of a bug against such an architecture if defined in future, check for the physical CPU HP case (not present) and return an error on any such attempt. On ARM64 virtual CPU Hotplug relies on the status value that can be queried via the AML method _STA for the CPU object. There are two conditions in which the CPU can be registered. 1) ACPI disabled. 2) ACPI enabled and the acpi_handle is available. _STA evaluates to the CPU is both enabled and present. (Note that in absence of the _STA method they are always in this state). If neither of these conditions is met the CPU is not 'yet' ready to be used and -EPROBE_DEFER is returned. Success occurs in the early attempt to register the CPUs if we are booting with DT (no concept yet of vCPU HP) if not it succeeds for already enabled CPUs when the ACPI Processor driver attaches to them. Finally it may succeed via the CPU Hotplug code indicating that the CPU is now enabled. For ACPI if CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR the only path to get to arch_register_cpu() with that handle set is via acpi_processor_hot_add_init() which is only called from an ACPI bus scan in which _STA has already been queried there is no need to repeat it here. Add a comment to remind us of this in the future. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v6: Add protection again Physical CPU HP to the arch specific code and don't actually check _STA Tested on arm64 with ACPI + DT build and DT only builds, booting with ACPI and DT as appropriate. --- arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index dc0e0b3ec2d4..ccb6ad347df9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -504,6 +504,59 @@ static int __init smp_cpu_setup(int cpu) static bool bootcpu_valid __initdata; static unsigned int cpu_count = 1; +int arch_register_cpu(int cpu) +{ + acpi_handle acpi_handle = acpi_get_processor_handle(cpu); + struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu); + + if (!acpi_disabled && !acpi_handle && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU + /* For now block anything that looks like physical CPU Hotplug */ + if (invalid_logical_cpuid(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); + return -ENODEV; + } +#endif + + /* + * Availability of the acpi handle is sufficient to establish + * that _STA has aleady been checked. No need to recheck here. + */ + c->hotpluggable = arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable(cpu); + + return register_cpu(c, cpu); +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU +void arch_unregister_cpu(int cpu) +{ + acpi_handle acpi_handle = acpi_get_processor_handle(cpu); + struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu); + acpi_status status; + unsigned long long sta; + + if (!acpi_handle) { + pr_err_once("Removing a CPU without associated ACPI handle\n"); + return; + } + + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(acpi_handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return; + + /* For now do not allow anything that looks like physical CPU HP */ + if (cpu_present(cpu) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); + return; + } + + unregister_cpu(c); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt cpu_madt_gicc[NR_CPUS]; From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789368 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA91E13F437; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360385; cv=none; b=l1t8Gwl+TpP7rItuzNMC5icPFnkVlmKWUgiSopPuAzRcnApGsi+xf8rtQsrdLmV4nOyiMt42vSLClHu1Il/yZplUM0Xsx6GgiMylVSPM4mWMypNEsQALHSUfTs3fVPfYPD6BlDaSDmNIDF3iDlHvX851tTZiX5R1mF2rYeFfDvY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360385; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tnjazo7gGiyTwc/AaQZOuCQ5MK+eaqwT/eCEqe3Bly0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t4Uzg8E37owCyO2hdGXz4v1QyB2wKXnJ18RRGVMM2Wc6g6S2lEht9OF548ZmRsJtFJX3Bn7vw269L9B169phAtZI3Wa0rip0Zi+BMu/vPqUPiVVH/7Pyd3bsiQ7HSQ2Z5plUl06DgGowjji9SWu/siKJavjLTB3u2dLgt38AMtI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM7m2MPxz6H80c; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:24:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66740140A46; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:26:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:26:19 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 14/16] arm64: Kconfig: Enable hotplug CPU on arm64 if ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled. Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-15-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) In order to move arch_register_cpu() to be called via the same path for initially present CPUs described by ACPI and hotplugged CPUs ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU needs to be enabled. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 7b11c98b3e84..fed7d0d54179 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ config ARM64 select ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED if ACPI select ACPI_GENERIC_GSI if ACPI select ACPI_GTDT if ACPI + select ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU if ACPI_PROCESSOR select ACPI_IORT if ACPI select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY if ACPI select ACPI_MCFG if (ACPI && PCI) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index dba8fcec7f33..a74e80d58df3 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -413,6 +414,21 @@ void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size) memblock_mark_nomap(addr, size); } +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU +int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 apci_id, + int *pcpu) +{ + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_cpu); /* check why */ + +int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu) +{ + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unmap_cpu); +#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_FFH /* * Implements ARM64 specific callbacks to support ACPI FFH Operation Region as From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789936 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BA313E414; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360415; cv=none; b=LPF8JAT12eLBvyjoK8U7tlU4P935V+Ow+MXj8Y9eTZGwmoJNg68k4REl5DRTfR3KIrpNrpxrzIhXH23wJK6GVqYHjDFxFYwuykOi/EYI/7HIWELEtqY8Q33MfbeakIpB3JzObOIeWdHVToBJF88ZeM6Sb52goiaG6Vci4ZS55Q8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360415; c=relaxed/simple; bh=at/D2TnqgbwauUxHhWlbNw1UdgkgeRlnps3s3gggvsQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lXJCudqIMTNa7eUF6sg4q9yYd0cx8KG7TH1LiazgaJEssFSMWA+9p/hHKvGFaJFXbrgYpGBMbUc0X1T8VFsYLE9x6gUhhdGeoGognuLQ6aOBn+CoAFjl5RMycvWRsnsg7eENLELvyk/kpkFTsJyTGS+ciSmzMVWSZ1rV5/osW1I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM8M2tHNz6JBK9; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:24:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F29140B38; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:26:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:26:50 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 15/16] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-16-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse Add a description of physical and virtual CPU hotplug, explain the differences and elaborate on what is required in ACPI for a working virtual hotplug system. Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change. --- Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..76ba8d932c72 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. _cpuhp_index: + +==================== +CPU Hotplug and ACPI +==================== + +CPU hotplug in the arm64 world is commonly used to describe the kernel taking +CPUs online/offline using PSCI. This document is about ACPI firmware allowing +CPUs that were not available during boot to be added to the system later. + +``possible`` and ``present`` refer to the state of the CPU as seen by linux. + + +CPU Hotplug on physical systems - CPUs not present at boot +---------------------------------------------------------- + +Physical systems need to mark a CPU that is ``possible`` but not ``present`` as +being ``present``. An example would be a dual socket machine, where the package +in one of the sockets can be replaced while the system is running. + +This is not supported. + +In the arm64 world CPUs are not a single device but a slice of the system. +There are no systems that support the physical addition (or removal) of CPUs +while the system is running, and ACPI is not able to sufficiently describe +them. + +e.g. New CPUs come with new caches, but the platform's cache toplogy is +described in a static table, the PPTT. How caches are shared between CPUs is +not discoverable, and must be described by firmware. + +e.g. The GIC redistributor for each CPU must be accessed by the driver during +boot to discover the system wide supported features. ACPI's MADT GICC +structures can describe a redistributor associated with a disabled CPU, but +can't describe whether the redistributor is accessible, only that it is not +'always on'. + +arm64's ACPI tables assume that everything described is ``present``. + + +CPU Hotplug on virtual systems - CPUs not enabled at boot +--------------------------------------------------------- + +Virtual systems have the advantage that all the properties the system will +ever have can be described at boot. There are no power-domain considerations +as such devices are emulated. + +CPU Hotplug on virtual systems is supported. It is distinct from physical +CPU Hotplug as all resources are described as ``present``, but CPUs may be +marked as disabled by firmware. Only the CPU's online/offline behaviour is +influenced by firmware. An example is where a virtual machine boots with a +single CPU, and additional CPUs are added once a cloud orchestrator deploys +the workload. + +For a virtual machine, the VMM (e.g. Qemu) plays the part of firmware. + +Virtual hotplug is implemented as a firmware policy affecting which CPUs can be +brought online. Firmware can enforce its policy via PSCI's return codes. e.g. +``DENIED``. + +The ACPI tables must describe all the resources of the virtual machine. CPUs +that firmware wishes to disable either from boot (or later) should not be +``enabled`` in the MADT GICC structures, but should have the ``online capable`` +bit set, to indicate they can be enabled later. The boot CPU must be marked as +``enabled``. The 'always on' GICR structure must be used to describe the +redistributors. + +CPUs described as ``online capable`` but not ``enabled`` can be set to enabled +by the DSDT's Processor object's _STA method. On virtual systems the _STA method +must always report the CPU as ``present``. Changes to the firmware policy can +be notified to the OS via device-check or eject-request. + +CPUs described as ``enabled`` in the static table, should not have their _STA +modified dynamically by firmware. Soft-restart features such as kexec will +re-read the static properties of the system from these static tables, and +may malfunction if these no longer describe the running system. Linux will +re-discover the dynamic properties of the system from the _STA method later +during boot. diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst index d08e924204bf..78544de0a8a9 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture asymmetric-32bit booting cpu-feature-registers + cpu-hotplug elf_hwcaps hugetlbpage kdump From patchwork Wed Apr 17 13:19:09 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 789367 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6FF413E411; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360445; cv=none; b=b7PYjhkOH1VQgtvvnL3QLvez5KyUCR9mr11Khw1nBY25hWj9wiI75VVs4LUlzZSST5tyZEcZiuseqLXmwj3Ty9gbCZ58J3yc0vDRaCiyFymbth6zC606ZkBMzhhKp8BJteiPbcmeAErsW36LRQlbqwrUcIOF6YQzQoTc6u2qFXo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713360445; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nEi9TiOqLxfYVD4gGYIavOlZFdedKFWIC0eDmJ80Ta4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QAtEgg7gKRr8Md+3jU+38QmVrtPDWvWL06hUHw5iriLoEGHxBjhaVf25HrqVzyhatHk4PY40mFqBzUIt8ULX0E3TwyjmBm74qEBwW63vetq4AkiCZwgyIaDqRukv+9rkaT/wVqNkpd0/z5ifjrIOIGNU74YE4aLSaOK+cIHJ7Uw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VKM5X0VpRz6K8pm; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:22:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0055140B33; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:27:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:27:21 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Subject: [PATCH v6 16/16] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:19:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20240417131909.7925-17-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240417131909.7925-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.213) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse The 'offline' file in sysfs shows all offline CPUs, including those that aren't present. User-space is expected to remove not-present CPUs from this list to learn which CPUs could be brought online. CPUs can be present but not-enabled. These CPUs can't be brought online until the firmware policy changes, which comes with an ACPI notification that will register the CPUs. With only the offline and present files, user-space is unable to determine which CPUs it can try to bring online. Add a new CPU mask that shows this based on all the registered CPUs. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 6 +++++ drivers/base/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++ include/linux/cpumask.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpu.c | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu index 710d47be11e0..808efb5b860a 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu @@ -694,3 +694,9 @@ Description: (RO) indicates whether or not the kernel directly supports modifying the crash elfcorehdr for CPU hot un/plug and/or on/offline changes. + +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/enabled +Date: Nov 2022 +Contact: Linux kernel mailing list +Description: + (RO) the list of CPUs that can be brought online. diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index b9d0d14e5960..4713b86d20f2 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ void unregister_cpu(struct cpu *cpu) { int logical_cpu = cpu->dev.id; + set_cpu_enabled(logical_cpu, false); unregister_cpu_under_node(logical_cpu, cpu_to_node(logical_cpu)); device_unregister(&cpu->dev); @@ -273,6 +274,13 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev, } static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL); +static ssize_t print_cpus_enabled(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_enabled_mask)); +} +static DEVICE_ATTR(enabled, 0444, print_cpus_enabled, NULL); + static ssize_t print_cpus_isolated(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { @@ -413,6 +421,7 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num) register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num)); dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT); + set_cpu_enabled(num, true); return 0; } @@ -494,6 +503,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_attrs[] = { &cpu_attrs[2].attr.attr, &dev_attr_kernel_max.attr, &dev_attr_offline.attr, + &dev_attr_enabled.attr, &dev_attr_isolated.attr, #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL &dev_attr_nohz_full.attr, diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h index 1c29947db848..4b202b94c97a 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr) * * cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable * cpu_present_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populated + * cpu_enabled_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu can be brought online * cpu_online_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to scheduler * cpu_active_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration * @@ -125,11 +126,13 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr) extern struct cpumask __cpu_possible_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask; +extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask; #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask) #define cpu_online_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask) +#define cpu_enabled_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask) #define cpu_present_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask) #define cpu_active_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask) #define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask) @@ -1009,6 +1012,7 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS); #else #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask) #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask) +#define for_each_enabled_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_enabled_mask) #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask) #endif @@ -1031,6 +1035,15 @@ set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible) cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask); } +static inline void +set_cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu, bool can_be_onlined) +{ + if (can_be_onlined) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask); + else + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask); +} + static inline void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present) { @@ -1112,6 +1125,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void) return raw_atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus); } #define num_possible_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask) +#define num_enabled_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_enabled_mask) #define num_present_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask) #define num_active_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask) @@ -1120,6 +1134,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask); } +static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_enabled_mask); +} + static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu) { return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_possible_mask); @@ -1144,6 +1163,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) #define num_online_cpus() 1U #define num_possible_cpus() 1U +#define num_enabled_cpus() 1U #define num_present_cpus() 1U #define num_active_cpus() 1U @@ -1157,6 +1177,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu) return cpu == 0; } +static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return cpu == 0; +} + static inline bool cpu_present(unsigned int cpu) { return cpu == 0; diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 07ad53b7f119..6d228f1c4e39 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -3117,6 +3117,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_possible_mask); struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_online_mask); +struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask __read_mostly; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_enabled_mask); + struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);