From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:02 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788832 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C5C313E890; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:37:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932672; cv=none; b=JqHGgVnjzMH8Hw/diNi6DaUbVntjaZYEi/DujlnzOaOnk/dUHidL3ZRVVDkGagRj2gV8HD70m6HF8spsi27//O9OkN7WUJ5y1BzPmHF+2mwSjd6X6dwfhAGRNHm6lELBVAPkhox9oPbC9jn7tT80a3e22JxERjxxbQc45KcLunY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932672; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5VUBVigD7N0bkRxonGZ3EDpQP4ueFOMirLrwBwMA3cQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mpBVd7vAoRYFY0YmPun2SahYRx1EGcjS/O5Qqi6CFkVO+9Pu2LYa1LV1UB+rGvchkrjspvdqgHSnmbnLyOoQVd+XtDfoDvczQ7WLhVEI0Ih5jrfXDrcojhu7lsfmDEhnKK/WTsNEWi6Y2BR6BJtZbYfsuH3urG+HPf5WjUsGGCs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGJyq6LRpz6K5nG; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:36:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B16B1400D4; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:37:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:47 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 01/18] cpu: Do not warn on arch_register_cpu() returning -EPROBE_DEFER Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) For arm64 the CPU registration cannot complete until the ACPI intepretter us up and running so in those cases the arch specific arch_register_cpu() will return -EPROBE_DEFER at this stage and the registration will be attempted later. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: New patch. Note that for now no arch_register_cpu() calls return -EPROBE_DEFER so it has no impact until the arm64 one is added later in this series. --- drivers/base/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index 56fba44ba391..b9d0d14e5960 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static void __init cpu_dev_register_generic(void) for_each_present_cpu(i) { ret = arch_register_cpu(i); - if (ret) + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) pr_warn("register_cpu %d failed (%d)\n", i, ret); } } From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:03 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788344 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C285E142623; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932702; cv=none; b=XutIL53/2isMUDsDOCGzb8hImp6MroJvetjIQoKn5OQMuvsgNWno/Y9tmRcdcJ8hVAgoGmoWJES+QP2Se/9jS8H8qReHduE0i7wnj38pzpIRRIar3sJ1pji9k+aV4Bqw/tMT1LS30iL7nMSq8TRYBEdYSGZbN1LCQQ5gYOzGr1U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932702; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y6N87qdluStjjtDyl26RLbGczWjBXCsKIsJelBr7mFI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ip4gRcB5p/imJ7A9VfQNAEJLcSP/yqYG6ocKX/3PxkbCiybfZS+qvxEeCajWbEBQInUqyMVW1OM2wiba6XWAHqZmtP2WYND65LIXtxCUe1oSh27VUik5m7qw941+NKukIwd3HruON5s7QNNkDneHyyFOFOLYFs6h4kvTVpR+PO8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGJvr2ZTxz67MmR; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:33:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2C66140A87; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:38:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:38:18 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 02/18] ACPI: processor: Set the ACPI_COMPANION for the struct cpu instance Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-3-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() needs to access the _STA method of the DSDT object so make it available by assigning the appropriate handle to the struct cpu instance. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 7a0dd35d62c9..93e029403d05 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) union acpi_object object = { 0 }; struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(union acpi_object), &object }; struct acpi_processor *pr = acpi_driver_data(device); + struct cpu *c; int device_declaration = 0; acpi_status status = AE_OK; static int cpu0_initialized; @@ -314,6 +315,8 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) cpufreq_add_device("acpi-cpufreq"); } + c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, pr->id); + ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&c->dev, device); /* * Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with * less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:04 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788831 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEAAA1419A0; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932733; cv=none; b=BQYfand1V40Ec6qan2vM9Np5HQjVZZF4Oi06UKIsaravEZadpwfBuOttSF/45mGV/YPh2qHG5BxWhoLeWD5qat/AMJo6mhq9jGXW3uEy9zxiJZBA3POHCtFMpJpbYWU3LrlYO7YkLy3p1iVAvGe48G4NHFfEdF5pEql3MbmmwmA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932733; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H2o2WbtZFiKrVbuwOeSpKPIKhDSMpWMr/HAJrb5dAes=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NpSsHnpb5zN54L9POuTDtQLnMzPYQoqDAKLXKiIcT0P0yWGXBdQFrXuSsTydc6T7u+TIxgEBLjzvWIUIJ/jTVtOBFSgM/0NxjX7GIcig+3wI/+F2WLn1cToy21Sbwfur6cvITlMGpoYMRDYNuosGRAhu64iz3XlI/MiEjLWw8DE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGJwR0J92z6K90N; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:33:59 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BCF21402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:38:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:38:48 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 03/18] ACPI: processor: Register deferred CPUs from acpi_processor_get_info() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse The arm64 specific arch_register_cpu() call may defer CPU registration until the ACPI interpreter is available and the _STA method can be evaluated. If this occurs, then a second attempt is made in acpi_processor_get_info(). Note that the arm64 specific call has not yet been added so for now this will never be successfully called. Systems can still be booted with 'acpi=off', or not include an ACPI description at all as in these cases arch_register_cpu() will not have deferred registration when first called. This moves the CPU register logic back to a subsys_initcall(), while the memory nodes will have been registered earlier. Note this is where the call was prior to the cleanup series so there should be no side effects of moving it back again for this specific case. [PATCH 00/21] Initial cleanups for vCPU HP. https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZVyz%2FVe5pPu8AWoA@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ e.g. 5b95f94c3b9f ("x86/topology: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES") Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Joanthan Cameron --- v5: Update commit message to make it clear this is moving the init back to where it was until very recently. No longer change the condition in the earlier registration point as that will be handled by the arm64 registration routine deferring until called again here. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 93e029403d05..c78398cdd060 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -317,6 +317,18 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, pr->id); ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&c->dev, device); + /* + * Register CPUs that are present. get_cpu_device() is used to skip + * duplicate CPU descriptions from firmware. + */ + if (!invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) && cpu_present(pr->id) && + !get_cpu_device(pr->id)) { + int ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); + + if (ret) + return ret; + } + /* * Extra Processor objects may be enumerated on MP systems with * less than the max # of CPUs. They should be ignored _iff From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788343 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB97814198A; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932763; cv=none; b=ZjP9LdHZf53ruPioIyVFDxbltK5Af9TCjLodU5CKEu1DhqSsVdDKI7GVeJWbfe0feqFj7/fWIXYM8g4ixQv2K2nopcTG7Od7IvrCBBa1J5dlE6r8PcY/FcoC2NzjdgJreJYFdyOmjyYBT7+XrbJJjPcay5kLbM923g50tF0a46M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932763; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qNAnme1XTmbODe/wLeql1C5zQsG0b4J6FCsam44PeQ4=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jn9i3CHCD83AeKHa1T6yJS8IMQ7CA5y84Nv6lmDeKpJR0QNG+8PkarVni72Fh/2jfSA1ySkzo/HYnEG7w54C3/UU2FqccUlsQEMLyBvZW5hoe26DNSejMTYdifpkRJn5CbBLT0TNiHh+XD6Sklu7v4eNt1RGbm4AC3hA/nCAdEo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK0b51Knz6K5pm; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:37:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0911B140C98; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:39:19 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 04/18] ACPI: Rename acpi_processor_hotadd_init and remove pre-processor guards Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse acpi_processor_hotadd_init() will make a CPU present by mapping it based on its hardware id. 'hotadd_init' is ambiguous once there are two different behaviours for cpu hotplug. This is for toggling the _STA present bit. Subsequent patches will add support for toggling the _STA enabled bit, named acpi_processor_make_enabled(). Rename it acpi_processor_make_present() to make it clear this is for CPUs that were not previously present. Expose the function prototypes it uses to allow the preprocessor guards to be removed. The IS_ENABLED() check will let the compiler dead-code elimination pass remove this if it isn't going to be used. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: Rebase. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 14 +++++--------- include/linux/acpi.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index c78398cdd060..05264722c207 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -183,13 +183,15 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */ /* Initialization */ -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) +static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) { unsigned long long sta; acpi_status status; int ret; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) + return -ENODEV; + if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) return -ENODEV; @@ -223,12 +225,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) cpu_maps_update_done(); return ret; } -#else -static inline int acpi_processor_hotadd_init(struct acpi_processor *pr) -{ - return -ENODEV; -} -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) { @@ -338,7 +334,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) * because cpuid <-> apicid mapping is persistent now. */ if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { - int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); + int ret = acpi_processor_make_present(pr); if (ret) return ret; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 34829f2c517a..2629c459738a 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -302,12 +302,10 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(acpi_handle handle, u32 cpu, } #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Arch dependent functions for cpu hotplug support */ int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, int *pcpu); int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu); -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_IOAPIC int acpi_get_ioapic_id(acpi_handle handle, u32 gsi_base, u64 *phys_addr); From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788830 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735781420BC; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932794; cv=none; b=jz3HQFAR6HIdRZOx3vy9Gc3ldwp5vtbkH27wsqcV4kFa2pvRkxcV/rmS0LKUuuMi7HEvjMpcTojkdJw8gOJB3IK5DLF+PmqXkaQhIQFsTfHEq+A1lg29UmxAie0dygERFfYVAJBdGmJUiXP4rj9tv6SgfNisUWqWNEO8I8pGQX4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932794; c=relaxed/simple; bh=G1mzVNFMFyOtaShtcH55y0Nz0XzTkDiTC1NulscfBlk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QeGMJ3iqdVoh8s5t2EDVmZL7GFah5p8C+kWX8KVLhSR691d5CqoGjQXonFBxPZ6xXIxvyUXfK6fVKXisEJQW/9JFpd2WNzxYcVgfP6IPNIKg1gfUkWfmyHpkj/vG+0aJOwMJy9kTDkW6QhMUV9bjfOw1Lcz+/I33Tg3oma+up3s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK185tN4z67GVD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:38:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9073F1408FE; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:39:50 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 05/18] ACPI: utils: Add an acpi_sta_enabled() helper and use it in acpi_processor_make_present() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) A device is enabled only if both the present and enabled bits are set in the result of calling the _STA method, or the _STA method is not present (in which case the device is always present and enabled). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: New patch --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 8 +++----- drivers/acpi/utils.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 05264722c207..3aa43dee4391 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -185,8 +185,6 @@ static void __init acpi_pcc_cpufreq_init(void) {} /* Initialization */ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) { - unsigned long long sta; - acpi_status status; int ret; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) @@ -195,9 +193,9 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) return -ENODEV; - status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)) - return -ENODEV; + ret = acpi_sta_enabled(pr->handle); + if (ret) + return ret; cpu_maps_update_begin(); cpus_write_lock(); diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c index 202234ba54bd..3004426b218c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c @@ -744,6 +744,27 @@ acpi_status acpi_evaluate_reg(acpi_handle handle, u8 space_id, u32 function) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_reg); +int acpi_sta_enabled(acpi_handle handle) +{ + unsigned long long sta; + bool present, enabled; + acpi_status status; + + if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_STA")) { + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return -ENODEV; + + present = sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT; + enabled = sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED; + if (!present || !enabled) { + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + } + return 0; + } + return 0; /* No _STA means always on! */ +} + /** * acpi_evaluate_dsm - evaluate device's _DSM method * @handle: ACPI device handle diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index 5de954e2b18a..e193507fd743 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle); bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle); bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle); +int acpi_sta_enabled(acpi_handle handle); bool acpi_check_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 funcs); union acpi_object *acpi_evaluate_dsm(acpi_handle handle, const guid_t *guid, u64 rev, u64 func, union acpi_object *argv4); From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788342 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AAAD13CF8A; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932825; cv=none; b=tAWE4TlTWUDFkP1aW3QAJ6Q0si4jHMD5DFrW10wnwobbFXb3YZqYKdWNrvFhvaGddr8R9bC2x6hcWZWvkZfbr9LIhSNE+/SZiVu+EvUGsBqSmakoLfn5fCNATFJRBfGuUl3qJMMxdOcVMcfqJTAXrZA4Kf3eMs3cFsYF4ym6pJY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932825; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z2WhAVTrf637bDu11h6vBJFFF/4AH5cUHWm5PG3cdck=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uzbIqahyA0UUxZVEMJNXv0JmyshuSeupKvlhj1bk6jBxXOmlJ1kNOoLyh2XMOjRS1HfHYDTdVQl6kZkxmNuHc7XgETmaNgj5RfEod6M/uFPC0ZtfTFwknyh0Y3rWmMDMSxgclu+f0VlAeHz4L3E7gdxPfyIOAocOAM4AlT8P//c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK1l59lbz6J9bP; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:38:35 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70E54140B55; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:40:21 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:40:20 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 06/18] ACPI: scan: Add parameter to allow defering some actions in acpi_scan_check_and_detach. Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a flag (not yet used) into acpi_scan_check_and detach(). Done in a separate patch with no functional changes to reduce complexity of the actual deferal which follows. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: New patch resulting from rebase. - Internal review suggested we could also do this with flags so I'm looking for feedback on which option people find more readable. --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 7c157bf92695..79b1f4d2b6bd 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -244,13 +244,19 @@ static int acpi_scan_try_to_offline(struct acpi_device *device) return 0; } -static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) +struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param { + bool check_status; + bool eject; +}; + +static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) { struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler; + struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param *param = p; - acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, check); + acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_scan_check_and_detach, p); - if (check) { + if (param->check_status) { acpi_bus_get_status(adev); /* * Skip devices that are still there and take the enabled @@ -288,7 +294,11 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *check) static void acpi_scan_check_subtree(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, (void *)true); + struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = { + .check_status = true, /* Not update until after ej0 */ + .eject = false, + }; + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p); } static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) @@ -2600,7 +2610,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_bus_scan); */ void acpi_bus_trim(struct acpi_device *adev) { - acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, NULL); + struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = { + .check_status = false, + .eject = false, + }; + + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(adev, &p); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_bus_trim); From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:08 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788829 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072E81419B1; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:40:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932856; cv=none; b=tiSiNg8GrJdkRXxr5dysvF4FDQMo8xzd2hkWKfGrHeM53S+K033hR3Neu61CUtkujN/0qQAW0XujZi/nCyaRIcHBYJmaRMrdYHgGaaVfMTh+/yUY6qOVELwSdMT3EoV+RAhLM2yxCkVY5JBB3XavJKuiumFWGyeEsDqp5XVvL0w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932856; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ip6fFydK0+gzKotHNwObsUiXCO5CAhdHx4vmOp5jT9c=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NyDh/xMIxmfl9P0fGpNkQqynmCfg5vCJWWOvloKThSiXedU7f565m9F04wmENPisl5vV6wsZy5sP7I7Fr+qh//QgVebtqqX806uRnunTOW0ni0T/DZZ/ApnhQQcNXwxgyKiVSR9X5ROAYslnl34+BnamolOEHRJYSMYmrcfODjA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK2M4h4bz6K5nM; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFDC2140CF4; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:40:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:40:51 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 07/18] ACPI: Add post_eject to struct acpi_scan_handler for cpu hotplug Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse struct acpi_scan_handler has a detach callback that is used to remove a driver when a bus is changed. When interacting with an eject-request, the detach callback is called before _EJ0. This means the ACPI processor driver can't use _STA to determine if a CPU has been made not-present, or some of the other _STA bits have been changed. acpi_processor_remove() needs to know the value of _STA after _EJ0 has been called. Add a post_eject callback to struct acpi_scan_handler. This is called after acpi_scan_hot_remove() has successfully called _EJ0. Because acpi_scan_check_and_detach() also clears the handler pointer, it needs to be told if the caller will go on to call acpi_bus_post_eject(), so that acpi_device_clear_enumerated() and clearing the handler pointer can be deferred. The extra eject flag added in the previous patch is used for this purpose. Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Joanthan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron ---- Russell, you hadn't signed off on this when posting last time. Do you want to insert a suitable tag now? v5: - Rebase to take into account the changes to scan handling in the meantime. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 4 ++-- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 3aa43dee4391..6b2ee0643d11 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Removal */ -static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) +static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; @@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = { .ids = processor_device_ids, .attach = acpi_processor_add, #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU - .detach = acpi_processor_remove, + .post_eject = acpi_processor_post_eject, #endif .hotplug = { .enabled = true, diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 79b1f4d2b6bd..992779ac31d4 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -276,8 +276,6 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) if (handler) { if (handler->detach) handler->detach(adev); - - adev->handler = NULL; } else { device_release_driver(&adev->dev); } @@ -287,6 +285,28 @@ static int acpi_scan_check_and_detach(struct acpi_device *adev, void *p) */ acpi_device_set_power(adev, ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD); adev->flags.initialized = false; + + /* For eject this is deferred to acpi_bus_post_eject() */ + if (!param->eject) { + adev->handler = NULL; + acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev); + } + return 0; +} + +static int acpi_bus_post_eject(struct acpi_device *adev, void *not_used) +{ + struct acpi_scan_handler *handler = adev->handler; + + acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse(adev, acpi_bus_post_eject, NULL); + + if (handler) { + if (handler->post_eject) + handler->post_eject(adev); + + adev->handler = NULL; + } + acpi_device_clear_enumerated(adev); return 0; @@ -306,6 +326,10 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_handle handle = device->handle; unsigned long long sta; acpi_status status; + struct acpi_scan_c_and_d_param p = { + .check_status = false, /* Not update until after ej0 */ + .eject = true, + }; if (device->handler && device->handler->hotplug.demand_offline) { if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(device, true)) @@ -318,7 +342,7 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_handle_debug(handle, "Ejecting\n"); - acpi_bus_trim(device); + acpi_scan_check_and_detach(device, &p); acpi_evaluate_lck(handle, 0); /* @@ -341,6 +365,8 @@ static int acpi_scan_hot_remove(struct acpi_device *device) } else if (sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED) { acpi_handle_warn(handle, "Eject incomplete - status 0x%llx\n", sta); + } else { + acpi_bus_post_eject(device, NULL); } return 0; diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index e193507fd743..27fdef17abe5 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct acpi_scan_handler { bool (*match)(const char *idstr, const struct acpi_device_id **matchid); int (*attach)(struct acpi_device *dev, const struct acpi_device_id *id); void (*detach)(struct acpi_device *dev); + void (*post_eject)(struct acpi_device *dev); void (*bind)(struct device *phys_dev); void (*unbind)(struct device *phys_dev); struct acpi_hotplug_profile hotplug; From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:09 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788341 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F63F14199C; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932886; cv=none; b=QRkpiWp4BiZaDScwCWK21YQt3hE6XAliIiR3/YakZEE+RYImHP7mLwoTo0rj3BNaFGKVUsrmR3YQqXxe04GD28E6kC11t48m9Pc4idvULKKjolK5dpTVA9fi+N5lt/1gby6ohX9Yjfqswy3ONlC0dwF8qlboiq5niN8ZdfgW7fI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932886; c=relaxed/simple; bh=h9Q/p4u1h1HqfFprhL65by7i9QVZUBczkA6t+LZrQF0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YOVR9W0FFqOe1k82uVK3C7/oG1rQlG057P6qex4sY8tWykMNjIjpZM/vGStEdbMsgYN0/ORh16OKl49T68vDkgo0154M/YPlg8L6YNkIAiTcvESTFGlOQ7vNl/BNfn/7IZit++f/XUcghNWrhvLjpaS/aE6rpSA4UAIS3jd+Cp4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK2x00Ksz6JB2x; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87871408FE; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:41:22 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 08/18] ACPI: convert acpi_processor_post_eject() to use IS_ENABLED() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:09 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-9-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: Russell King Rather than ifdef'ing acpi_processor_post_eject() and its use site, use IS_ENABLED() to increase compile coverage. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 6b2ee0643d11..15d89f80857b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -461,12 +461,14 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, return result; } -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU /* Removal */ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) + return; + if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device)) return; @@ -505,7 +507,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map); kfree(pr); } -#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU */ #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle) @@ -630,9 +631,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = { static struct acpi_scan_handler processor_handler = { .ids = processor_device_ids, .attach = acpi_processor_add, -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU .post_eject = acpi_processor_post_eject, -#endif .hotplug = { .enabled = true, }, From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788828 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E9212BF36; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932916; cv=none; b=EcE1h00ITV0fLP+guU/DwfdbkyjKr99h94qTv8e5K6r71nqOTkm7I7vEhVR/cJjWCIo8z9+daPXTbr84q75c4xo73jRb70Dv6qiyXpU7Wz2EyX9HuYeeYbxKUQipJJ99uKRm92cKmmYhbiOp8VuXoy+DqgHZCLGHIL8BM7cUXTo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932916; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UZlhSbbgxvmCDpuKqnBh552fwklRGUKBiILYhkwfa80=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=W8BchQsjafNo7V1cg9Wbcg232MgY5Yu93Q3i8kOBs2WHKQPA3iI1hkY6kKVM49wGi+20JjTgGQr7OWS0izOLIwpRXu7BmLctttiVUoe0lgG8/11FnV69O1ZwL+CLLF4cl5GO+18uhunDHiYeZegliibmM2xWLTflfuyutvsQ/1Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK3W4VpYz6J9bP; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:40:07 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 624C81402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:41:52 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 09/18] ACPI: Check _STA present bit before making CPUs not present Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse When called acpi_processor_post_eject() unconditionally make a CPU not-present and unregisters it. To add support for AML events where the CPU has become disabled, but remains present, the _STA method should be checked before calling acpi_processor_remove(). Rename acpi_processor_post_eject() acpi_processor_remove_possible(), and check the _STA before calling. Adding the function prototype for arch_unregister_cpu() allows the preprocessor guards to be removed. After this change CPUs will remain registered and visible to user-space as offline if buggy firmware triggers an eject-request, but doesn't clear the corresponding _STA bits after _EJ0 has been called. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 15d89f80857b..0403eddb3f80 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -462,16 +462,13 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, } /* Removal */ -static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) +static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) return; - if (!device || !acpi_driver_data(device)) - return; - pr = acpi_driver_data(device); if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids) goto out; @@ -508,6 +505,29 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) kfree(pr); } +static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) +{ + struct acpi_processor *pr; + unsigned long long sta; + acpi_status status; + + if (!device) + return; + + pr = acpi_driver_data(device); + if (!pr || pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids || invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) + return; + + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_STA", NULL, &sta); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return; + + if (cpu_present(pr->id) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT)) { + acpi_processor_make_not_present(device); + return; + } +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC bool __init processor_physically_present(acpi_handle handle) { From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:11 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788340 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08DBB1422D9; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932948; cv=none; b=P/lUp7pWl+iWK9H+Iwn6Xof6dShuLztQeQ3paOKiryShBMbd/FdtJO3qXoL8ljTekN0oBw14YWjlcJbde0X8UT+mNd2/6+3RSQOGZP6nTCRdnHX8SxDsnPmGy0T6ImHftEVvr+mUGV8S2+aGeN9KnC4qv657pxWFe0J5jtCqN+w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932948; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2GdqiP0JC/ghCLdQfEGwLcBG/F3i4l8nIw33SDUmodY=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=d5168pEcVKRQLA57yzjp66FEJouMiMKdxqvUpzVqQRpp+lZJNth72IjNbwEKjJvFNDd0KDBW1D12COIuZG/J3YmjCTHpqoPgwtGwP+GQRsBxFb8Dg0gxeZI53Kw821ciy8do2wuEgD5ZcITTPM5BhkXT4UktUbQ1KtQm9KUZqBQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK0Y3rFyz6K8wp; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:37:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E15E81402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:42:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:42:23 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 10/18] ACPI: Warn when the present bit changes but the feature is not enabled Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-11-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse ACPI firmware can trigger the events to add and remove CPUs, but the OS may not support this. Print an error message when this happens. This gives early warning on arm64 systems that don't support CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_PRESENT_CPU, as making CPUs not present has side effects for other parts of the system. Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 0403eddb3f80..3fb167ee9807 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -187,8 +187,10 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) { int ret; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported\n"); return -ENODEV; + } if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) return -ENODEV; @@ -466,8 +468,10 @@ static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU)) { + pr_err_once("Changing CPU present bit is not supported"); return; + } pr = acpi_driver_data(device); if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids) From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:12 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788827 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D1C86252; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932979; cv=none; b=f1BMClvEvmp4Cu3QvvjGl/Lw5M7OlmzKNh9Dcsvfa7Lh9PfVAz2tXhyAlSf+anlrUo43uOT07MXNCzRs3EZcXNyY1Gj3+saRPHIGMwbhPItENzl+kkznxp0MYCqRdEK9Oh4ensZSuM0NG32HMkPjRkEWkjERMKmgSktB4SZcXJs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712932979; c=relaxed/simple; bh=79hbwtJD4/XXrhjGo4Fh0oSQCXnzo5qxqRI9JeV+GUI=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qhLWDZZZf+2qVyVmNUD1+COR9yPrHzcmcjYC7+wCtBpUfa4JHjfTN8hetNowiiL7bFjm3U/l/BMYYklKcvWvFzN84O/hm1hEEzr1RngIXZq4dxHqU5Bic5kR1DA3+ByU8NSzosxXiAL5cseLFJdQpqzIa/5CWEyVvHPwcCswQg0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK4h5JBxz6JB3D; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BDB01400D4; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:42:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:42:53 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 11/18] arm64: acpi: Move get_cpu_for_acpi_id() to a header Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-12-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse ACPI identifies CPUs by UID. get_cpu_for_acpi_id() maps the ACPI UID to the linux CPU number. The helper to retrieve this mapping is only available in arm64's numa code. Move it to live next to get_acpi_id_for_cpu(). Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 11 +++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 11 ----------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h index 6792a1f83f2a..bc9a6656fc0c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h @@ -119,6 +119,17 @@ static inline u32 get_acpi_id_for_cpu(unsigned int cpu) return acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc(cpu)->uid; } +static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid) +{ + int cpu; + + for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) + if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu)) + return cpu; + + return -EINVAL; +} + static inline void arch_fix_phys_package_id(int num, u32 slot) { } void __init acpi_init_cpus(void); int apei_claim_sea(struct pt_regs *regs); diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c index e51535a5f939..0c036a9a3c33 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c @@ -34,17 +34,6 @@ int __init acpi_numa_get_nid(unsigned int cpu) return acpi_early_node_map[cpu]; } -static inline int get_cpu_for_acpi_id(u32 uid) -{ - int cpu; - - for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) - if (uid == get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu)) - return cpu; - - return -EINVAL; -} - static int __init acpi_parse_gicc_pxm(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const unsigned long end) { From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:13 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788339 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E8A14199C; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933008; cv=none; b=GABfXkUa1XN3aE0yQ9V5CkC/9XszZGoH5AkGyJSNWDJ1xpThu/5rhO3NPkLE/aGdTg94Kpm1xKG8la7Mm57y0vn0JztPQ9OSk1yMX6femVExWFpBgjfPc6ft1PP4FLSay7BzcwzzEogT64Ogm8jk+bmadu90kDueTk7SQEihtSk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933008; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dmhJWSD9xv9dYuU9/FWuiIHdAi7HU4yHvwTLrzYdN34=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cJ8as1J6tRAcUWMf9DBZ8ZlDicBO9YjxSFcsufEuEtHp9TENJA5vnVNryZEYLffV8OIoJhxLAuyiMl/YScUx+f6s/6smygPqYEmtAIYX505VMu9KDQCDmTMShJeBnYSUMbyv+0wDBTjpkIec/jm0+7ueBi0v1uo03judUvKfc+I= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK5J5Rbfz6J6KY; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DA221402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:43:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:43:24 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 12/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc() Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:13 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse gic_acpi_match_gicc() is only called via gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(). It should only count the number of enabled redistributors, but it also tries to sanity check the GICC entry, currently returning an error if the Enabled bit is set, but the gicr_base_address is zero. Adding support for the online-capable bit to the sanity check will complicate it, for no benefit. The existing check implicitly depends on gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions() previous failing to find any GICR regions (as it is valid to have gicr_base_address of zero if the redistributors are described via a GICR entry). Instead of complicating the check, remove it. Failures that happen at this point cause the irqchip not to register, meaning no irqs can be requested. The kernel grinds to a panic() pretty quickly. Without the check, MADT tables that exhibit this problem are still caught by gic_populate_rdist(), which helpfully also prints what went wrong: | CPU4: mpidr 100 has no re-distributor! Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 6fb276504bcc..10af15f93d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2415,19 +2415,10 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means * GICR base is presented via GICC */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) { + if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; - return 0; - } - /* - * It's perfectly valid firmware can pass disabled GICC entry, driver - * should not treat as errors, skip the entry instead of probe fail. - */ - if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) - return 0; - - return -ENODEV; + return 0; } static int __init gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions(void) From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:14 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788826 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DD8E13CFB6; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933039; cv=none; b=PGjgRNKB/EHzVmMvOuqQsRcGVIAgAZImmC+3yWOQ+B1yGnAZYhjI/ESjayHiYT1gEXovZkQ1OxgtnwxInTjRFU7tOwgwX6tjaIcndy2HNPLA370UgtJYE6IjSmqPIx/2SMDL//yeiLMK3WHDWKdbrNUF/tUlEmm5QAD8QYmiwLg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933039; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8PkKGvCQLT87jpkOOWeRPKjETbhhsSNzxiAzXF+L118=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a1+BIy6KDchVqygIvBVA7oC8yGpGO6PKisxn4oC7ITzPts3IgmoLqYs+m3DsNg+xToT9QMIL+CZaphJTJy8Ci+/ABxqtc1dXI9VA5tGtosBSPIvp+6zwu+TtGk3wr9ISlO5OnijAWJmdUcJ0hDOIDbK+i1sYYzKE8E0phyH2EkA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK2K3jThz6K92Z; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:39:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D554B140B55; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:43:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:43:55 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 13/18] irqchip/gic-v3: Add support for ACPI's disabled but 'online capable' CPUs Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-14-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse To support virtual CPU hotplug, ACPI has added an 'online capable' bit to the MADT GICC entries. This indicates a disabled CPU entry may not be possible to online via PSCI until firmware has set enabled bit in _STA. This means that a "usable" GIC is one that is marked as either enabled, or online capable. Therefore, change acpi_gicc_is_usable() to check both bits. However, we need to change the test in gic_acpi_match_gicc() back to testing just the enabled bit so the count of enabled distributors is correct. What about the redistributor in the GICC entry? ACPI doesn't want to say. Assume the worst: When a redistributor is described in the GICC entry, but the entry is marked as disabled at boot, assume the redistributor is inaccessible. The GICv3 driver doesn't support late online of redistributors, so this means the corresponding CPU can't be brought online either. Clear the possible and present bits. Systems that want CPU hotplug in a VM can ensure their redistributors are always-on, and describe them that way with a GICR entry in the MADT. When mapping redistributors found via GICC entries, handle the case where the arch code believes the CPU is present and possible, but it does not have an accessible redistributor. Print a warning and clear the present and possible bits. Signed-off-by: James Morse Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No Change. --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/acpi.h | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c index 10af15f93d4d..66132251c1bb 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c @@ -2363,11 +2363,25 @@ gic_acpi_parse_madt_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)header; u32 reg = readl_relaxed(acpi_data.dist_base + GICD_PIDR2) & GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_MASK; u32 size = reg == GIC_PIDR2_ARCH_GICv4 ? SZ_64K * 4 : SZ_64K * 2; + int cpu = get_cpu_for_acpi_id(gicc->uid); void __iomem *redist_base; if (!acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc)) return 0; + /* + * Capable but disabled CPUs can be brought online later. What about + * the redistributor? ACPI doesn't want to say! + * Virtual hotplug systems can use the MADT's "always-on" GICR entries. + * Otherwise, prevent such CPUs from being brought online. + */ + if (!(gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) { + pr_warn_once("CPU %u's redistributor is inaccessible: this CPU can't be brought online\n", cpu); + set_cpu_present(cpu, false); + set_cpu_possible(cpu, false); + return 0; + } + redist_base = ioremap(gicc->gicr_base_address, size); if (!redist_base) return -ENOMEM; @@ -2413,9 +2427,12 @@ static int __init gic_acpi_match_gicc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, /* * If GICC is enabled and has valid gicr base address, then it means - * GICR base is presented via GICC + * GICR base is presented via GICC. The redistributor is only known to + * be accessible if the GICC is marked as enabled. If this bit is not + * set, we'd need to add the redistributor at runtime, which isn't + * supported. */ - if (acpi_gicc_is_usable(gicc) && gicc->gicr_base_address) + if (gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED && gicc->gicr_base_address) acpi_data.enabled_rdists++; return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 2629c459738a..6dd396825bb5 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry (struct acpi_subtable_header *madt); static inline bool acpi_gicc_is_usable(struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc) { - return gicc->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED; + return gicc->flags & (ACPI_MADT_ENABLED | + ACPI_MADT_GICC_ONLINE_CAPABLE); } /* the following numa functions are architecture-dependent */ From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:15 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788338 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675FA142621; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933069; cv=none; b=Lj5a13VUvUdN+1Ff8JuPyDAFtGrXXRA37c5YPz2GVxUK9r6CNxP0svekuhv7/yzPUuzGUUFT19us3G/5mD+Y7Z/LERoKwzHnBHeuW0nHv+z6TAO70ACOArPCfiAjqmOcvxyfTSh93c0TYhfMtI1lh/0K5p1IjrnZfIgkD5ujcDI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933069; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Sc4/QQMpboLSwi8LX/TNfgEscS/XcoKFrynL6Fxk/lc=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ICGQFVsl7hOv5z7nObnw1T9hvUHXhBeAj+qw4ZPVAMPk6fBfB9JuHn2hYLtye/n6OUTlCdlvbtV7jS1JVhh74qiFN6NaY94S/OG98aM9a/ucW53v9OU1oNvdFG3CFM18jfLekRc8YENPiJjT4JT/1yjbH51VwlWQx2Bu6axdRQo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK6V13R3z6J6Kh; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:42:42 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712161408FE; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:44:26 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:44:25 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 14/18] arm64: psci: Ignore DENIED CPUs Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:15 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-15-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: Jean-Philippe Brucker When a CPU is marked as disabled, but online capable in the MADT, PSCI applies some firmware policy to control when it can be brought online. PSCI returns DENIED to a CPU_ON request if this is not currently permitted. The OS can learn the current policy from the _STA enabled bit. Handle the PSCI DENIED return code gracefully instead of printing an error. See https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0022/f/?lang=en page 58. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker [ morse: Rewrote commit message ] Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c | 2 +- arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c index 29a8e444db83..fabd732d0a2d 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/psci.c @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int cpu_psci_cpu_boot(unsigned int cpu) { phys_addr_t pa_secondary_entry = __pa_symbol(secondary_entry); int err = psci_ops.cpu_on(cpu_logical_map(cpu), pa_secondary_entry); - if (err) + if (err && err != -EPERM) pr_err("failed to boot CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu, err); return err; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index 4ced34f62dab..dc0e0b3ec2d4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -132,7 +132,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) /* Now bring the CPU into our world */ ret = boot_secondary(cpu, idle); if (ret) { - pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); + if (ret != -EPERM) + pr_err("CPU%u: failed to boot: %d\n", cpu, ret); return ret; } From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:16 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788825 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CF7C142E97; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:44:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933101; cv=none; b=tabs24PG2aJa70W7OuCEEeHo0aXvkjEFkeRzaQBgB+sgjoLMVI5O8iDyQsLmcDFs30HwUV+pbnAGSwraMRLrR5J5Dubdsb808DgPOUrQl+aRpiKd48pW9FegMfIvaWF3GNBIC6c6ljsiJbj+8Y2cTUZkMQy94n9Mb9RY4HH+x60= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933101; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zPPqCIBLFIrD7nGYgb70z0Tk7OlI8MxKknjXzceK0ss=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Fj+ohnbQ+FUc5wtSRQvcFO0UB6+XwsMiXiWIVtMusvDvt2N9GckTh82cpnFjbkROukoljLS3MqAXciVk6d6p7+jaYw3OOf0TdkPWgszVSug6713O91W6eilDmRYHSJRg7bKoK23zUQwBQbNodWEM4upp+WUoeHf80SeQYP4u9FE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK74578bz6J6Xr; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:43:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B48B1402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:44:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:44:56 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 15/18] arm64: arch_register_cpu() variant to allow checking of ACPI _STA Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:16 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-16-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) On ARM64 virtual CPU Hotplug relies on the status value that can be queried via the AML method _STA for the CPU object. There are two conditions in which the CPU can be registered. 1) ACPI disabled. 2) ACPI enabled and the acpi_handle is available. _STA evaluates to the CPU is both enabled and present. (Note that in absences of the _STA method they are always in this state). If neither of these conditions is met the CPU is not 'yet' ready to be used and -EPROBE_DEFER is returned. Success occurs in the early attempt to register the CPUs if we are booting with DT (no concept yet of vCPU HP) if not it succeeds for already enabled CPUs when the ACPI Processor driver attaches to them. Finally it may succeed via the CPU Hotplug code indicating that the CPU is now enabled. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: New patch. --- arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c index dc0e0b3ec2d4..68f2e7974815 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c @@ -504,6 +504,26 @@ static int __init smp_cpu_setup(int cpu) static bool bootcpu_valid __initdata; static unsigned int cpu_count = 1; +int arch_register_cpu(int cpu) +{ + struct cpu *c = &per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu); + acpi_handle acpi_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&c->dev); + int ret; + + if (!acpi_disabled && !acpi_handle) + return -EPROBE_DEFER; + if (acpi_handle) { + ret = acpi_sta_enabled(acpi_handle); + if (ret) { + /* Not enabled */ + return ret; + } + } + c->hotpluggable = arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable(cpu); + + return register_cpu(c, cpu); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI static struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt cpu_madt_gicc[NR_CPUS]; From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:17 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788337 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92FCB8614D; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933131; cv=none; b=g4ZMM/QDr22nvfBeRrPgjQ8n+/xcthaUvEpa9Nx+DgmzHba7JIx7GaTx9LXl+GQ9XX2o0Bsww82fj8Uskhqk5FT7xu+B3K/tJWewuddEpWANL3em6/qz8SMlCZo+SaiGh22kWMrZzCj86D1zJSnwph/AZD2dziLfExtQFQNZPPA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933131; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Zh2SqBQq28G/7th8Ws/9M8NeB0ZeAz1H/E9UJ16xcjU=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eU7XxUiUpns0Nm+7IT4Afh2V37iwpKX4hYbFPgxsCd4i1/kn2YKZH63KypCilWwzD3RBu2MqYk5Y8pfvdnHc6Zw3Ej+CczmUk6ZksBmY4UI8Rcnv/Zre7SAXhomV3ewKy1+DSKPGAB+B8yRi9jgXFOhMMNBhNd8uSB/dZk+P6QU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK7g2hZzz6J6WZ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:43:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8CC41402CD; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:45:27 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:45:27 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 16/18] ACPI: add support to (un)register CPUs based on the _STA enabled bit Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-17-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse acpi_processor_get_info() registers all present CPUs. Registering a CPU is what creates the sysfs entries and triggers the udev notifications. arm64 virtual machines that support 'virtual cpu hotplug' use the enabled bit to indicate whether the CPU can be brought online, as the existing ACPI tables require all hardware to be described and present. If firmware describes a CPU as present, but disabled, skip the registration. Such CPUs are present, but can't be brought online for whatever reason. (e.g. firmware/hypervisor policy). Once firmware sets the enabled bit, the CPU can be registered and brought online by user-space. Online CPUs, or CPUs that are missing an _STA method must always be registered. When firmware clears the enabled bit, we need to unregister the CPU for symetry. As this is dependent on hotplug CPU being support, and arch_unregister_cpu() only exists when hotplug CPU is supported, we need to add a check for that configuration symbol. Note that some elements in the *make_present() and *make_not_present() paths are not appropriate for the *enabled() paths beause they are related to elements such as interrupt controller setup that are done for all present (but not enabled) CPUs at boot. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Co-developed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: Make the enable and present paths look much more like each other. Whilst similar, I think combining the two paths any more will lead to less readable code by implying they are more similar than they actually should be. --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index 3fb167ee9807..ffa2bc63da40 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -226,6 +226,24 @@ static int acpi_processor_make_present(struct acpi_processor *pr) return ret; } +static int acpi_processor_make_enabled(struct acpi_processor *pr) +{ + int ret; + + if (invalid_phys_cpuid(pr->phys_id)) + return -ENODEV; + + cpus_write_lock(); + ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); + cpus_write_unlock(); + + if (ret) + return ret; + + pr_info("CPU%d has been hot-added (onlined)\n", pr->id); + return 0; +} + static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) { union acpi_object object = { 0 }; @@ -319,7 +337,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) */ if (!invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) && cpu_present(pr->id) && !get_cpu_device(pr->id)) { - int ret = arch_register_cpu(pr->id); + int ret = acpi_processor_make_enabled(pr); if (ret) return ret; @@ -463,6 +481,27 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, return result; } +static void acpi_processor_make_not_enabled(struct acpi_device *device) +{ + struct acpi_processor *pr; + + pr = acpi_driver_data(device); + if (pr->id >= nr_cpu_ids) + goto out; + + device_release_driver(pr->dev); + per_cpu(processor_device_array, pr->id) = NULL; + per_cpu(processors, pr->id) = NULL; + cpus_write_lock(); + arch_unregister_cpu(pr->id); + cpus_write_unlock(); + + try_offline_node(cpu_to_node(pr->id)); +out: + free_cpumask_var(pr->throttling.shared_cpu_map); + kfree(pr); +} + /* Removal */ static void acpi_processor_make_not_present(struct acpi_device *device) { @@ -515,7 +554,7 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) unsigned long long sta; acpi_status status; - if (!device) + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || !device) return; pr = acpi_driver_data(device); @@ -530,6 +569,9 @@ static void acpi_processor_post_eject(struct acpi_device *device) acpi_processor_make_not_present(device); return; } + + if (cpu_present(pr->id) && !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_ENABLED)) + acpi_processor_make_not_enabled(device); } #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_MIGHT_HAVE_ACPI_PDC From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:18 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788824 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05C31419B0; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933163; cv=none; b=svCKIfuaK7zVITKNTyQmSdzQEx2errDGVSGFiYJsGf97b9rpIOWGv77cab/Q/y2MbE9yu30ZGW3R1e657z1g9rHXOihGgLJ2yjGEAxaHFBIB22em99+PzJ7FVShXgN661qgDydfpBDH++1bbIgVMcwctk5sHcwWp1Eoggm0soL8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=at/D2TnqgbwauUxHhWlbNw1UdgkgeRlnps3s3gggvsQ=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Fp6O7nN7uN32P9u1Fomb/FE7uxBCslo7vXsSb3kjeSHDjKtSSnrmsdDWQGABoVooL3sLyb0om5FiRF8nt3pd04HGwuSeNOTcPsmothTfTHVFAsc0xb2Y9+8fylGfaz6vq6n1WCkFtA7+WJ3Xdu1EPjlGbz3thx3kTkoZwQo9kkg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK4h0yHRz688p7; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 773E31400D4; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:45:58 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:45:57 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 17/18] arm64: document virtual CPU hotplug's expectations Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-18-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse Add a description of physical and virtual CPU hotplug, explain the differences and elaborate on what is required in ACPI for a working virtual hotplug system. Signed-off-by: James Morse Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change. --- Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst | 1 + 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..76ba8d932c72 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/cpu-hotplug.rst @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +.. _cpuhp_index: + +==================== +CPU Hotplug and ACPI +==================== + +CPU hotplug in the arm64 world is commonly used to describe the kernel taking +CPUs online/offline using PSCI. This document is about ACPI firmware allowing +CPUs that were not available during boot to be added to the system later. + +``possible`` and ``present`` refer to the state of the CPU as seen by linux. + + +CPU Hotplug on physical systems - CPUs not present at boot +---------------------------------------------------------- + +Physical systems need to mark a CPU that is ``possible`` but not ``present`` as +being ``present``. An example would be a dual socket machine, where the package +in one of the sockets can be replaced while the system is running. + +This is not supported. + +In the arm64 world CPUs are not a single device but a slice of the system. +There are no systems that support the physical addition (or removal) of CPUs +while the system is running, and ACPI is not able to sufficiently describe +them. + +e.g. New CPUs come with new caches, but the platform's cache toplogy is +described in a static table, the PPTT. How caches are shared between CPUs is +not discoverable, and must be described by firmware. + +e.g. The GIC redistributor for each CPU must be accessed by the driver during +boot to discover the system wide supported features. ACPI's MADT GICC +structures can describe a redistributor associated with a disabled CPU, but +can't describe whether the redistributor is accessible, only that it is not +'always on'. + +arm64's ACPI tables assume that everything described is ``present``. + + +CPU Hotplug on virtual systems - CPUs not enabled at boot +--------------------------------------------------------- + +Virtual systems have the advantage that all the properties the system will +ever have can be described at boot. There are no power-domain considerations +as such devices are emulated. + +CPU Hotplug on virtual systems is supported. It is distinct from physical +CPU Hotplug as all resources are described as ``present``, but CPUs may be +marked as disabled by firmware. Only the CPU's online/offline behaviour is +influenced by firmware. An example is where a virtual machine boots with a +single CPU, and additional CPUs are added once a cloud orchestrator deploys +the workload. + +For a virtual machine, the VMM (e.g. Qemu) plays the part of firmware. + +Virtual hotplug is implemented as a firmware policy affecting which CPUs can be +brought online. Firmware can enforce its policy via PSCI's return codes. e.g. +``DENIED``. + +The ACPI tables must describe all the resources of the virtual machine. CPUs +that firmware wishes to disable either from boot (or later) should not be +``enabled`` in the MADT GICC structures, but should have the ``online capable`` +bit set, to indicate they can be enabled later. The boot CPU must be marked as +``enabled``. The 'always on' GICR structure must be used to describe the +redistributors. + +CPUs described as ``online capable`` but not ``enabled`` can be set to enabled +by the DSDT's Processor object's _STA method. On virtual systems the _STA method +must always report the CPU as ``present``. Changes to the firmware policy can +be notified to the OS via device-check or eject-request. + +CPUs described as ``enabled`` in the static table, should not have their _STA +modified dynamically by firmware. Soft-restart features such as kexec will +re-read the static properties of the system from these static tables, and +may malfunction if these no longer describe the running system. Linux will +re-discover the dynamic properties of the system from the _STA method later +during boot. diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst index d08e924204bf..78544de0a8a9 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/index.rst @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture asymmetric-32bit booting cpu-feature-registers + cpu-hotplug elf_hwcaps hugetlbpage kdump From patchwork Fri Apr 12 14:37:19 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 788336 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E44314386F; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933192; cv=none; b=Uii9rbW/bQq3zyd08C2Bs3/uOIA+X5hUqoFOYepUeuToWegUf/Dm3ByvnY6F4lG6WgMHbzS5HrXvSAI+xgw5kr9xqtN67thkTSj/s8k2YziDIV6+ch3KgHBJh/vSL8erap+2sZmbUon9nayo2Sp2aDPZjTXc647unObE3c4JYag= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712933192; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rv7MBAehN1l8e5kAHjjJdnNaTTdIY+7KU7psaQclR+U=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NBRQvgHeJukvvLjXd1+nOPNyDda5eafnsESIpwtWZg3syje57aTiReajSg9kLATowNKLD2goBuJ8KyTizPzQsGH97IkEz8/Vq+S3W7HyK/fT+hV8GIOZQZGCXAkzar0aU5upHMbPwgbdUA9snVQwH4gcsZNHnYu7Bk/gLgYN0gc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4VGK5G4Pmlz6K8y1; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:41:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066131408FE; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:46:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from SecurePC-101-06.china.huawei.com (10.122.247.231) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:46:28 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , , , , , , Russell King , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Miguel Luis , James Morse , Salil Mehta , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v5 18/18] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that can be brought online Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:37:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20240412143719.11398-19-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20240412143719.11398-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500006.china.huawei.com (7.191.161.198) To lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) From: James Morse The 'offline' file in sysfs shows all offline CPUs, including those that aren't present. User-space is expected to remove not-present CPUs from this list to learn which CPUs could be brought online. CPUs can be present but not-enabled. These CPUs can't be brought online until the firmware policy changes, which comes with an ACPI notification that will register the CPUs. With only the offline and present files, user-space is unable to determine which CPUs it can try to bring online. Add a new CPU mask that shows this based on all the registered CPUs. Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Miguel Luis Tested-by: Vishnu Pajjuri Tested-by: Jianyong Wu Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- v5: No change --- .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 6 +++++ drivers/base/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++ include/linux/cpumask.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ kernel/cpu.c | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu index 710d47be11e0..808efb5b860a 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu @@ -694,3 +694,9 @@ Description: (RO) indicates whether or not the kernel directly supports modifying the crash elfcorehdr for CPU hot un/plug and/or on/offline changes. + +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/enabled +Date: Nov 2022 +Contact: Linux kernel mailing list +Description: + (RO) the list of CPUs that can be brought online. diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index b9d0d14e5960..4713b86d20f2 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ void unregister_cpu(struct cpu *cpu) { int logical_cpu = cpu->dev.id; + set_cpu_enabled(logical_cpu, false); unregister_cpu_under_node(logical_cpu, cpu_to_node(logical_cpu)); device_unregister(&cpu->dev); @@ -273,6 +274,13 @@ static ssize_t print_cpus_offline(struct device *dev, } static DEVICE_ATTR(offline, 0444, print_cpus_offline, NULL); +static ssize_t print_cpus_enabled(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_enabled_mask)); +} +static DEVICE_ATTR(enabled, 0444, print_cpus_enabled, NULL); + static ssize_t print_cpus_isolated(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { @@ -413,6 +421,7 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num) register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num)); dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, PM_QOS_RESUME_LATENCY_NO_CONSTRAINT); + set_cpu_enabled(num, true); return 0; } @@ -494,6 +503,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_attrs[] = { &cpu_attrs[2].attr.attr, &dev_attr_kernel_max.attr, &dev_attr_offline.attr, + &dev_attr_enabled.attr, &dev_attr_isolated.attr, #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL &dev_attr_nohz_full.attr, diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h index 1c29947db848..4b202b94c97a 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h @@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr) * * cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable * cpu_present_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populated + * cpu_enabled_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu can be brought online * cpu_online_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to scheduler * cpu_active_mask - has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu available to migration * @@ -125,11 +126,13 @@ static inline void set_nr_cpu_ids(unsigned int nr) extern struct cpumask __cpu_possible_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask; +extern struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_active_mask; extern struct cpumask __cpu_dying_mask; #define cpu_possible_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_possible_mask) #define cpu_online_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_online_mask) +#define cpu_enabled_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_enabled_mask) #define cpu_present_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_present_mask) #define cpu_active_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_active_mask) #define cpu_dying_mask ((const struct cpumask *)&__cpu_dying_mask) @@ -1009,6 +1012,7 @@ extern const DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_all_bits, NR_CPUS); #else #define for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask) #define for_each_online_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask) +#define for_each_enabled_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_enabled_mask) #define for_each_present_cpu(cpu) for_each_cpu((cpu), cpu_present_mask) #endif @@ -1031,6 +1035,15 @@ set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible) cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_possible_mask); } +static inline void +set_cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu, bool can_be_onlined) +{ + if (can_be_onlined) + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask); + else + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &__cpu_enabled_mask); +} + static inline void set_cpu_present(unsigned int cpu, bool present) { @@ -1112,6 +1125,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void) return raw_atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus); } #define num_possible_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask) +#define num_enabled_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_enabled_mask) #define num_present_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask) #define num_active_cpus() cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask) @@ -1120,6 +1134,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask); } +static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_enabled_mask); +} + static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu) { return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_possible_mask); @@ -1144,6 +1163,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) #define num_online_cpus() 1U #define num_possible_cpus() 1U +#define num_enabled_cpus() 1U #define num_present_cpus() 1U #define num_active_cpus() 1U @@ -1157,6 +1177,11 @@ static inline bool cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu) return cpu == 0; } +static inline bool cpu_enabled(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return cpu == 0; +} + static inline bool cpu_present(unsigned int cpu) { return cpu == 0; diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 8f6affd051f7..537099bf5d02 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -3117,6 +3117,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_possible_mask); struct cpumask __cpu_online_mask __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_online_mask); +struct cpumask __cpu_enabled_mask __read_mostly; +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_enabled_mask); + struct cpumask __cpu_present_mask __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cpu_present_mask);