From patchwork Tue Feb 21 19:08:57 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Evan Green X-Patchwork-Id: 655851 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DFBC61DA3 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229546AbjBUTJ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:09:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:32892 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230129AbjBUTJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 14:09:52 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF67F30B06 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id c1so6414533plg.4 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:09:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=2Tqclwd4xuHoIstm7B9UCq8HRirfokgGB9GqloWqZiE=; b=Glob1piUQen2dFOUxlhvjRQj1tFTffF+lmacJDS8QehrlDVh4nBSsxUVpti29enOmc Ts3wco5RVkC/XsDz7hiLoMRoqNlJ2rz+fpVTLNlKx46nR+IUjT21SYM0Ta8uD1mbYVJm w7GE5FT6oG9+lb+XUNup35yMK+qbWTBvqvO9GWhSk0rnPafkitJM82jwEF3qiTZRreIZ cbO5Cq002Bt1cu2tKL1BJe973TcIvwMkBi/OdRgdFqY/S185mPI/l/1QANji5hwDdsxi 48Y6Qv3FKj9BmZlRAjAFkMya5T7OSCx3dzUwzhKjoZbKxJcx/mKWejGjM2WIdYKbrso+ YWPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=2Tqclwd4xuHoIstm7B9UCq8HRirfokgGB9GqloWqZiE=; b=LMvn6Dyh3SpYduIerUNW8Nxfmwmt/YxxeTF2rDCpmWYJlHp9qNUlbcbLu9x86uQp4i Yemq8ejpxMpaTmCts6iC3ZcCxm0BSQs0Bcjdpr2pJEtkt6ELZdkl7Uysmv7Mz/JlziTr U4r5bjC9DKBOCSciPNNLtNUpVJTl626doAALkV2aot5xizfOHtJuZX/w+jsyNp4tNcHY uBxkaq6ty3pokGCkJhlzwiN8spoh0ay5n8Mx7WhzGoOGFStA4VH7kq/hRMOvCJjnRr7w w2Uc2OdmKWW/nFeY+VBHCx+RVf5zg1e/3UQwctfAEobzThFMsMLbnB5b+uuuI6OPsV9d RcNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX+9gPopw3BQI/GfIYnHa3ERnLCGlBGLNcVEWBZDoDXX5gvxztq Ulx5zXtAq36lcED5Ww7H0sfL0g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8KKr96eBrj1R/guBqOwnlQKDGOKsi6FPJZIyeJcudjAKXfowybkO6ZGH2MC0wQPkyoqLAyrg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:394f:b0:c0:df5b:e9e7 with SMTP id r15-20020a056a20394f00b000c0df5be9e7mr6407888pzg.60.1677006581159; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from evan.ba.rivosinc.com ([66.220.2.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16-20020a170902b61000b0019602b2c00csm1583863pls.175.2023.02.21.11.09.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:09:40 -0800 (PST) From: Evan Green To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: heiko@sntech.de, Conor Dooley , slewis@rivosinc.com, vineetg@rivosinc.com, Evan Green , Albert Ou , Catalin Marinas , Mark Brown , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v3 6/7] selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 11:08:57 -0800 Message-Id: <20230221190858.3159617-7-evan@rivosinc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20230221190858.3159617-1-evan@rivosinc.com> References: <20230221190858.3159617-1-evan@rivosinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org This adds a test for the recently added RISC-V interface for probing hardware capabilities. It happens to be the first selftest we have for RISC-V, so I've added some infrastructure for those as well. The build stuff looks pretty straight-forward, but there's also a tiny C library to avoid coupling this to any userspace implementation. Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt Signed-off-by: Evan Green --- (no changes since v2) Changes in v2: - Updated the selftests to the new API and added some more. - Fixed indentation, comments in .S, and general checkpatch complaints. --- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile | 58 ++++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile | 10 +++ .../testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S | 12 +++ 5 files changed, 170 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index 41b649452560..a599ef726310 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ TARGETS += pstore TARGETS += ptrace TARGETS += openat2 TARGETS += resctrl +TARGETS += riscv TARGETS += rlimits TARGETS += rseq TARGETS += rtc diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..32a72902d045 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Originally tools/testing/arm64/Makefile + +# When ARCH not overridden for crosscompiling, lookup machine +ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) + +ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),riscv)) +RISCV_SUBTARGETS ?= hwprobe +else +RISCV_SUBTARGETS := +endif + +CFLAGS := -Wall -O2 -g + +# A proper top_srcdir is needed by KSFT(lib.mk) +top_srcdir = $(realpath ../../../../) + +# Additional include paths needed by kselftest.h and local headers +CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/testing/selftests/ + +CFLAGS += $(KHDR_INCLUDES) + +export CFLAGS +export top_srcdir + +all: + @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ + mkdir -p $$BUILD_TARGET; \ + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ + done + +install: all + @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ + done + +run_tests: all + @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ + done + +# Avoid any output on non riscv on emit_tests +emit_tests: all + @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ + done + +clean: + @for DIR in $(RISCV_SUBTARGETS); do \ + BUILD_TARGET=$(OUTPUT)/$$DIR; \ + $(MAKE) OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$DIR $@; \ + done + +.PHONY: all clean install run_tests emit_tests diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ebdbb3c22e54 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +# Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited +# Originally tools/testing/arm64/abi/Makefile + +TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe + +include ../../lib.mk + +$(OUTPUT)/hwprobe: hwprobe.c sys_hwprobe.S + $(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ddfb61de2938 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +#include + +/* + * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it + * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to + * contain the call. + */ +long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, long pair_count, + long cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned long flags); + +int main(int argc, char **argv) +{ + struct riscv_hwprobe pairs[8]; + unsigned long cpus; + long out; + + /* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */ + cpus = -1; + + /* + * Just run a basic test: pass enough pairs to get up to the base + * behavior, and then check to make sure it's sane. + */ + for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++) + pairs[i].key = i; + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0); + if (out != 0) + return -1; + for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) { + /* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */ + if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i)) + return -2; + + if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR) + continue; + + if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA) + continue; + + return -3; + } + + /* + * This should also work with a NULL CPU set, but should not work + * with an improperly supplied CPU set. + */ + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0); + if (out != 0) + return -4; + + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0); + if (out == 0) + return -5; + + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0); + if (out == 0) + return -6; + + /* + * Check that keys work by providing one that we know exists, and + * checking to make sure the resultig pair is what we asked for. + */ + pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR; + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0); + if (out != 0) + return -7; + if (pairs[0].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR) + return -8; + + /* + * Check that an unknown key gets overwritten with -1, + * but doesn't block elements after it. + */ + pairs[0].key = 0x5555; + pairs[1].key = 1; + pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA; + out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0); + if (out != 0) + return -9; + + if (pairs[0].key != -1) + return -10; + + if ((pairs[1].key != 1) || (pairs[1].value == 0xAAAA)) + return -11; + + return 0; +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ed8d28863b27 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/sys_hwprobe.S @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* Copyright (C) 2022 Rivos, Inc */ + +.text +.global riscv_hwprobe +riscv_hwprobe: + # Put __NR_riscv_hwprobe in the syscall number register, then just shim + # back the kernel's return. This doesn't do any sort of errno + # handling, the caller can deal with it. + li a7, 258 + ecall + ret