From patchwork Mon Aug 29 16:12:33 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 600872 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEF8ECAAD5 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 16:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229491AbiH2QMi (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:12:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60492 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229468AbiH2QMh (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 12:12:37 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl (cloudserver094114.home.pl [79.96.170.134]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A6A673323; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:12:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (HELO v370.home.net.pl) by /usr/run/smtp (/usr/run/postfix/private/idea_relay_lmtp) via UNIX with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 5.0.0) id 25f68f9ee1e36123; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:12:34 +0200 Received: from kreacher.localnet (public-gprs523165.centertel.pl [31.61.162.222]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by v370.home.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0945C66D25F; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:12:34 +0200 (CEST) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: LKML , Andy Shevchenko , Linux PM Subject: [PATCH v1] ACPI: property: Use acpi_dev_parent() Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 18:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4756666.GXAFRqVoOG@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CLIENT-IP: 31.61.162.222 X-CLIENT-HOSTNAME: public-gprs523165.centertel.pl X-VADE-SPAMSTATE: clean X-VADE-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrvdekuddgleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecujffqoffgrffnpdggtffipffknecuuegrihhlohhuthemucduhedtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgggfgtsehtufertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfgrfhgrvghlucflrdcuhgihshhotghkihdfuceorhhjfiesrhhjfiihshhotghkihdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffffffekgfehheffleetieevfeefvefhleetjedvvdeijeejledvieehueevueffnecukfhppeefuddriedurdduiedvrddvvddvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinhgvthepfedurdeiuddrudeivddrvddvvddphhgvlhhopehkrhgvrggthhgvrhdrlhhotggrlhhnvghtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepfdftrghfrggvlhculfdrucghhihsohgtkhhifdcuoehrjhifsehrjhifhihsohgtkhhirdhnvghtqedpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepgedprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdgrtghpihesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdhkvghrnhgvlhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhhihidrshhhvghvtghhvghnkhhosehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqphhmsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdho rhhg X-DCC--Metrics: v370.home.net.pl 1024; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: Rafael J. Wysocki After introducing acpi_dev_parent() in commit 62fcb99bdf10 ("ACPI: Drop parent field from struct acpi_device"), it is better to use it instead of accessing the dev.parent field in struct acpi_device directly. Modify acpi_node_get_parent() accordingly. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c =================================================================== --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -1269,10 +1269,11 @@ acpi_node_get_parent(const struct fwnode return to_acpi_data_node(fwnode)->parent; } if (is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) { - struct device *dev = to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)->dev.parent; + struct acpi_device *parent; - if (dev) - return acpi_fwnode_handle(to_acpi_device(dev)); + parent = acpi_dev_parent(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode)); + if (parent) + return acpi_fwnode_handle(parent); } return NULL;