From patchwork Fri Jul 8 14:39:21 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Conor Dooley X-Patchwork-Id: 588659 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15FBCCA47B for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237847AbiGHOjb (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:39:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58368 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238038AbiGHOja (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:39:30 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6ACA1B7AC; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1657291169; x=1688827169; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E7lc4EnKiZ1cJys8i7k2b1wZuaqqZKmkVBwqdNfKks0=; b=lR16GG3ARnFq5/fgQNR2zE6fcKMqn8kqtUG+puttq7tBsRli+fmhM/UH jXQ+PqJGDiAMP82zbWUgd9AKAiQ2xCk6k3beConUWLR3QtZVqZAZNKo8e FvP7TkTrOR2D3cCM2qN6KdKB9Y3I6ayRCCqnSG7SGm3sSB3dD8l6S39Ho klxi7W3RJvWR+ljInsqVOTULQa2LwpgEy98soVHB8aBnBCVEfKkK8EZME mtEer7d8n/MpTADRmFTEGMEbHzAx4Nc3zpff5CqTId9I8v8PYicov8odM b+It5yJvVSPLVSvHMHq/FW/PRCNn6KtJT+0NAFnSOeSRggMNJLBrUQfzo g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,255,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="181342726" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa1.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 08 Jul 2022 07:39:29 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex02.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:27 -0700 Received: from wendy.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2375.17 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:25 -0700 From: Conor Dooley To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , "Lee Jones" , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" CC: Daire McNamara , , , , , Conor Dooley Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:39:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20220708143923.1129928-3-conor.dooley@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220708143923.1129928-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> References: <20220708143923.1129928-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org \#pwm-cells for the Icicle kit's fabric PWM was incorrectly set to 2 & blindly overridden by the (out of tree) driver anyway. The core can support inverted operation, so update the entry to correctly report its capabilities. Fixes: 72560c6559b8 ("riscv: dts: microchip: add fpga fabric section to icicle kit") Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley --- arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi index 0d28858b83f2..e09a13aef268 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-icicle-kit-fabric.dtsi @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ core_pwm0: pwm@41000000 { compatible = "microchip,corepwm-rtl-v4"; reg = <0x0 0x41000000 0x0 0xF0>; microchip,sync-update-mask = /bits/ 32 <0>; - #pwm-cells = <2>; + #pwm-cells = <3>; clocks = <&fabric_clk3>; status = "disabled"; }; From patchwork Fri Jul 8 14:39:22 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Conor Dooley X-Patchwork-Id: 588658 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E15CCA47B for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 14:39:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238038AbiGHOji (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:39:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58400 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238241AbiGHOjd (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2022 10:39:33 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 107541B7AC; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1657291171; x=1688827171; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lSx0OPdPdvVin79U9nT5HdNOn78XDODzEPHjKHD1c0E=; b=RU8tu6xMrn4DQ1R0JMwl/GMf9TsRBejEKG+tAr/9v2NIgTnUxuzJwVTj zDL9G+pOmvwJbhftKRax2ffMNLfr7kjWUxx/1lTNrGXlJyYDhxfk8JuBU eM+0mASn/5BIQBtZY508V63pOdl/UgC29QgTsT1k4v1eLZb8AVt/0SJwf 6ATz0yhejq/IiEM2o6bWg3Zw98/bkWhKpxFJty7M49YqYfH9dr09ng6et U99JNiFCN9WUalpUoEudMJpJuSqMTh3gsK35x0jFeDbaKuVuiT5Wlwcl+ ykHSeWGrMxI2nVVyY9qnlDOoEHINqaETebsKjwnn4z+D61EqjUW5Zco9n Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.92,255,1650956400"; d="scan'208";a="171611107" Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa3.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 08 Jul 2022 07:39:31 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.17; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:30 -0700 Received: from wendy.microchip.com (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2375.17 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:39:28 -0700 From: Conor Dooley To: Thierry Reding , =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6n?= =?utf-8?q?ig?= , "Lee Jones" , Rob Herring , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" CC: Daire McNamara , , , , , Conor Dooley Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:39:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20220708143923.1129928-4-conor.dooley@microchip.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220708143923.1129928-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> References: <20220708143923.1129928-1-conor.dooley@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Add a driver that supports the Microchip FPGA "soft" PWM IP core. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley --- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 10 + drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c | 355 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 366 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index 904de8d61828..007ea5750e73 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig @@ -383,6 +383,16 @@ config PWM_MEDIATEK To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be called pwm-mediatek. +config PWM_MICROCHIP_CORE + tristate "Microchip corePWM PWM support" + depends on SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE || COMPILE_TEST + depends on HAS_IOMEM && OF + help + PWM driver for Microchip FPGA soft IP core. + + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module + will be called pwm-microchip-core. + config PWM_MXS tristate "Freescale MXS PWM support" depends on ARCH_MXS || COMPILE_TEST diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index 5c08bdb817b4..43feb7cfc66a 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PCI) += pwm-lpss-pci.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_LPSS_PLATFORM) += pwm-lpss-platform.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MESON) += pwm-meson.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MEDIATEK) += pwm-mediatek.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MICROCHIP_CORE) += pwm-microchip-core.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MTK_DISP) += pwm-mtk-disp.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_MXS) += pwm-mxs.o obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_NTXEC) += pwm-ntxec.o diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3471eb2c8645 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-microchip-core.c @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * corePWM driver for Microchip "soft" FPGA IP cores. + * + * Copyright (c) 2021-2022 Microchip Corporation. All rights reserved. + * Author: Conor Dooley + * Documentation: + * https://www.microsemi.com/document-portal/doc_download/1245275-corepwm-hb + * + * Limitations: + * - If the IP block is configured without "shadow registers", all register + * writes will take effect immediately, causing glitches on the output. + * If shadow registers *are* enabled, a write to the "SYNC_UPDATE" register + * notifies the core that it needs to update the registers defining the + * waveform from the contents of the "shadow registers". + * - The IP block has no concept of a duty cycle, only rising/falling edges of + * the waveform. Unfortunately, if the rising & falling edges registers have + * the same value written to them the IP block will do whichever of a rising + * or a falling edge is possible. I.E. a 50% waveform at twice the requested + * period. Therefore to get a 0% waveform, the output is set the max high/low + * time depending on polarity. + * - The PWM period is set for the whole IP block not per channel. The driver + * will only change the period if no other PWM output is enabled. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +#define PREG_TO_VAL(PREG) ((PREG) + 1) + +#define MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE_MAX 0x100 +#define MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_STEPS_MAX 0xff +#define MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_MAX 0xff00 + +#define MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE 0x00 +#define MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD 0x04 +#define MCHPCOREPWM_EN(i) (0x08 + 0x04 * (i)) /* 0x08, 0x0c */ +#define MCHPCOREPWM_POSEDGE(i) (0x10 + 0x08 * (i)) /* 0x10, 0x18, ..., 0x88 */ +#define MCHPCOREPWM_NEGEDGE(i) (0x14 + 0x08 * (i)) /* 0x14, 0x1c, ..., 0x8c */ +#define MCHPCOREPWM_SYNC_UPD 0xe4 + +struct mchp_core_pwm_chip { + struct pwm_chip chip; + struct clk *clk; + spinlock_t lock; /* protect the shared period */ + void __iomem *base; + u32 sync_update_mask; +}; + +static inline struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *to_mchp_core_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip) +{ + return container_of(chip, struct mchp_core_pwm_chip, chip); +} + +static void mchp_core_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, bool enable) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_core_pwm = to_mchp_core_pwm(chip); + u8 channel_enable, reg_offset, shift; + + /* + * There are two adjacent 8 bit control regs, the lower reg controls + * 0-7 and the upper reg 8-15. Check if the pwm is in the upper reg + * and if so, offset by the bus width. + */ + reg_offset = MCHPCOREPWM_EN(pwm->hwpwm >> 3); + shift = pwm->hwpwm > 7 ? pwm->hwpwm - 8 : pwm->hwpwm; + + spin_lock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); + + channel_enable = readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + reg_offset); + channel_enable &= ~(1 << shift); + channel_enable |= (enable << shift); + + writel_relaxed(channel_enable, mchp_core_pwm->base + reg_offset); + + /* + * Write to the sync update registers so that channels with shadow + * registers will also get their enable update. This operation is a NOP + * for channels without shadow registers. + */ + writel_relaxed(1U, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_SYNC_UPD); + + spin_unlock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); +} + +static void mchp_core_pwm_apply_duty(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state, u8 prescale, u8 period_steps) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_core_pwm = to_mchp_core_pwm(chip); + u64 duty_steps, period, tmp; + u8 posedge, negedge; + u16 prescale_val = PREG_TO_VAL(prescale); + u8 period_steps_val = PREG_TO_VAL(period_steps); + + period = period_steps_val * prescale_val * NSEC_PER_SEC; + period = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(period, clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk)); + + /* + * Calculate the duty cycle in multiples of the prescaled period: + * duty_steps = duty_in_ns / step_in_ns + * step_in_ns = (prescale * NSEC_PER_SEC) / clk_rate + * The code below is rearranged slightly to only divide once. + * + * Because the period is per channel, it is possible that the requested + * duty cycle is longer than the period, in which case cap it to the + * period. + */ + if (state->duty_cycle > period) { + duty_steps = period_steps_val; + } else { + duty_steps = state->duty_cycle * clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk); + tmp = prescale_val * NSEC_PER_SEC; + duty_steps = div64_u64(duty_steps, tmp); + } + + /* + * Turn the output on unless posedge == negedge, in which case the + * duty is intended to be 0, but limitations of the IP block don't + * allow a zero length duty cycle - so just set the max high/low time + * respectively. + */ + if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED) { + negedge = !duty_steps ? period_steps_val : 0u; + posedge = duty_steps; + } else { + posedge = !duty_steps ? period_steps_val : 0u; + negedge = duty_steps; + } + + writel_relaxed(posedge, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_POSEDGE(pwm->hwpwm)); + writel_relaxed(negedge, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_NEGEDGE(pwm->hwpwm)); +} + +static int mchp_core_pwm_apply_period(struct pwm_chip *chip, const struct pwm_state *state, + u8 *prescale, u8 *period_steps) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_core_pwm = to_mchp_core_pwm(chip); + u64 tmp, clk_rate; + u16 prescale_val, period_steps_val; + + /* + * Calculate the period cycles and prescale values. + * The registers are each 8 bits wide & multiplied to compute the period + * using the formula: + * (clock_period) * (prescale + 1) * (period_steps + 1) + * so the maximum period that can be generated is 0x10000 times the + * period of the input clock. + * However, due to the design of the "hardware", it is not possible to + * attain a 100% duty cycle if the full range of period_steps is used. + * Therefore period_steps is restricted to 0xFE and the maximum multiple + * of the clock period attainable is 0xFF00. + */ + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk); + if (clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) + return -EINVAL; + + tmp = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(state->period, clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC); + + if (tmp >= MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_MAX) { + *prescale = MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE_MAX - 1; + *period_steps = MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_STEPS_MAX - 1; + goto write_registers; + } + + for (prescale_val = 1; prescale_val <= MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE_MAX; prescale_val++) { + period_steps_val = div_u64(tmp, prescale_val); + if (period_steps_val > MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD_STEPS_MAX) + continue; + *period_steps = period_steps_val - 1; + *prescale = prescale_val - 1; + break; + } + +write_registers: + writel_relaxed(*prescale, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE); + writel_relaxed(*period_steps, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD); + + return 0; +} + +static int mchp_core_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + const struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_core_pwm = to_mchp_core_pwm(chip); + struct pwm_state current_state = pwm->state; + bool period_locked; + u64 period; + u16 channel_enabled; + u8 prescale, period_steps; + int ret; + + if (!state->enabled) { + mchp_core_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, false); + return 0; + } + + /* + * If the only thing that has changed is the duty cycle or the polarity, + * we can shortcut the calculations and just compute/apply the new duty + * cycle pos & neg edges + * As all the channels share the same period, do not allow it to be + * changed if any other channels are enabled. + */ + spin_lock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); + + channel_enabled = (((u16)readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_EN(1)) << 8) | + readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_EN(0))); + period_locked = channel_enabled & ~(1 << pwm->hwpwm); + + if ((!current_state.enabled || current_state.period != state->period) && !period_locked) { + ret = mchp_core_pwm_apply_period(chip, state, &prescale, &period_steps); + if (ret) { + spin_unlock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); + return ret; + } + } else { + prescale = readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE); + period_steps = readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD); + } + + /* + * If the period is locked, it may not be possible to use a period less + * than that requested. + */ + period = PREG_TO_VAL(period_steps) * PREG_TO_VAL(prescale) * NSEC_PER_SEC; + do_div(period, clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk)); + if (period > state->period) { + spin_unlock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); + return -EINVAL; + } + + mchp_core_pwm_apply_duty(chip, pwm, state, prescale, period_steps); + + /* + * Notify the block to update the waveform from the shadow registers. + * The updated values will not appear on the bus until they have been + * applied to the waveform at the beginning of the next period. We must + * write these registers and wait for them to be applied before calling + * enable(). + */ + if (mchp_core_pwm->sync_update_mask & (1 << pwm->hwpwm)) { + writel_relaxed(1U, mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_SYNC_UPD); + usleep_range(state->period, state->period * 2); + } + + spin_unlock(&mchp_core_pwm->lock); + + mchp_core_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, true); + + return 0; +} + +static void mchp_core_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, + struct pwm_state *state) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_core_pwm = to_mchp_core_pwm(chip); + u8 prescale, period_steps, duty_steps; + u8 posedge, negedge; + u16 channel_enabled; + + channel_enabled = (((u16)readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_EN(1)) << 8) | + readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_EN(0))); + + if (channel_enabled & 1 << pwm->hwpwm) + state->enabled = true; + else + state->enabled = false; + + prescale = PREG_TO_VAL(readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PRESCALE)); + + posedge = readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_POSEDGE(pwm->hwpwm)); + negedge = readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_NEGEDGE(pwm->hwpwm)); + + duty_steps = abs((s16)posedge - (s16)negedge); + state->duty_cycle = duty_steps * prescale * NSEC_PER_SEC; + do_div(state->duty_cycle, clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk)); + + state->polarity = negedge < posedge ? PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED : PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL; + + period_steps = PREG_TO_VAL(readb_relaxed(mchp_core_pwm->base + MCHPCOREPWM_PERIOD)); + state->period = period_steps * prescale * NSEC_PER_SEC; + do_div(state->period, clk_get_rate(mchp_core_pwm->clk)); +} + +static const struct pwm_ops mchp_core_pwm_ops = { + .apply = mchp_core_pwm_apply, + .get_state = mchp_core_pwm_get_state, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, +}; + +static const struct of_device_id mchp_core_of_match[] = { + { + .compatible = "microchip,corepwm-rtl-v4", + }, + { /* sentinel */ } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mchp_core_of_match); + +static int mchp_core_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct mchp_core_pwm_chip *mchp_pwm; + struct resource *regs; + int ret; + + mchp_pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mchp_pwm), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!mchp_pwm) + return -ENOMEM; + + mchp_pwm->base = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, ®s); + if (IS_ERR(mchp_pwm->base)) + return PTR_ERR(mchp_pwm->base); + + mchp_pwm->clk = devm_clk_get_enabled(&pdev->dev, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(mchp_pwm->clk)) + return PTR_ERR(mchp_pwm->clk); + + if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "microchip,sync-update-mask", + &mchp_pwm->sync_update_mask)) + mchp_pwm->sync_update_mask = 0u; + + spin_lock_init(&mchp_pwm->lock); + + mchp_pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev; + mchp_pwm->chip.ops = &mchp_core_pwm_ops; + mchp_pwm->chip.npwm = 16; + + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(&pdev->dev, &mchp_pwm->chip); + if (ret < 0) + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "failed to add PWM chip\n"); + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mchp_pwm); + + return 0; +} + +static struct platform_driver mchp_core_pwm_driver = { + .driver = { + .name = "mchp-core-pwm", + .of_match_table = mchp_core_of_match, + }, + .probe = mchp_core_pwm_probe, +}; +module_platform_driver(mchp_core_pwm_driver); + +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_AUTHOR("Conor Dooley "); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("corePWM driver for Microchip FPGAs");