From patchwork Wed Jun 9 02:22:21 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: lijian_8010a29@163.com X-Patchwork-Id: 458232 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0FCC48BCF for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 02:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA096128A for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 02:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233143AbhFIC0B (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:26:01 -0400 Received: from m12-16.163.com ([220.181.12.16]:46450 "EHLO m12-16.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233745AbhFIC0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:26:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=5TGYv pzFiLqgSFjEHruR/qql6v+FgILO+nB88xoTYpg=; b=N+rdWbzH171iz/Hk5UFhE b+0vG+rJcMgIgvnY2lqL86i8+FQHgtsi5a9saUek/wJzidggN6dcxeAjSQ/VtYA8 mgdmLJpFFyCAebUvUkGE4H3FQnaIyuV8LOM2sU/LM0uy1gtyy86tKDc79JRSh7dL TnjNkX8sHGyw2qDKvSrI4w= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [218.17.89.92]) by smtp12 (Coremail) with SMTP id EMCowACnrVkaJsBgJslqwA--.15068S2; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 10:23:23 +0800 (CST) From: lijian_8010a29@163.com To: james.smart@broadcom.com, dick.kennedy@broadcom.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lijian Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: lpfc_init: deleted these repeated words Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 10:22:21 +0800 Message-Id: <20210609022221.306132-1-lijian_8010a29@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: EMCowACnrVkaJsBgJslqwA--.15068S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxJFWfGw1Dtw1UZw4DtFy7ZFb_yoW5WFy5pF WxG3W7Wr1kGF4IqFyfCw4ruF1av3yrXF9IyFWIgw1furWFkF97tFyxtFyUJry5JF40v3ya vr92kr48W3WUJFDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07b1zV8UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [218.17.89.92] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5olmxttqbyiikqdsmqqrwthudrp/xtbBERusUFaEEqRoLAAAsW Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: lijian deleted these repeated words 'the', 'using' and 'be' in the comments. Signed-off-by: lijian --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c index 5f018d02bf56..f6c26342ad69 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c @@ -5105,7 +5105,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_async_link_evt(struct lpfc_hba *phba, bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_link_spd, la, (bf_get(lpfc_acqe_link_speed, acqe_link))); - /* Fake the the following irrelvant fields */ + /* Fake the following irrelvant fields */ bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_topology, la, LPFC_TOPOLOGY_PT_PT); bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_alpa_granted, la, 0); bf_set(lpfc_mbx_read_top_il, la, 0); @@ -5905,7 +5905,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_async_fip_evt(struct lpfc_hba *phba, phba->fcf.fcf_flag &= ~FCF_ACVL_DISC; spin_unlock_irq(&phba->hbalock); /* - * Last resort will be re-try on the + * Last resort will be re-try on * the current registered FCF entry. */ lpfc_retry_pport_discovery(phba); @@ -10829,7 +10829,7 @@ lpfc_find_cpu_handle(struct lpfc_hba *phba, uint16_t id, int match) for_each_present_cpu(cpu) { cpup = &phba->sli4_hba.cpu_map[cpu]; - /* If we are matching by EQ, there may be multiple CPUs using + /* If we are matching by EQ, there may be multiple CPUs * using the same vector, so select the one with * LPFC_CPU_FIRST_IRQ set. */ @@ -11017,7 +11017,7 @@ lpfc_cpu_affinity_check(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int vectors) /* Mark CPU as IRQ not assigned by the kernel */ cpup->flag |= LPFC_CPU_MAP_UNASSIGN; - /* If so, find a new_cpup thats on the the SAME + /* If so, find a new_cpup thats on the SAME * phys_id as cpup. start_cpu will start where we * left off so all unassigned entries don't get assgined * the IRQ of the first entry. @@ -11868,7 +11868,7 @@ lpfc_unset_hba(struct lpfc_hba *phba) * I/Os every 30 seconds, log error message, and wait forever. Only when * all XRI exchange busy complete, the driver unload shall proceed with * invoking the function reset ioctl mailbox command to the CNA and the - * the rest of the driver unload resource release. + * rest of the driver unload resource release. **/ static void lpfc_sli4_xri_exchange_busy_wait(struct lpfc_hba *phba) @@ -12046,7 +12046,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_hba_unset(struct lpfc_hba *phba) * This function is called in the SLI4 code path to read the port's * sli4 capabilities. * - * This function may be be called from any context that can block-wait + * This function may be called from any context that can block-wait * for the completion. The expectation is that this routine is called * typically from probe_one or from the online routine. **/