From patchwork Wed Mar 30 11:45:19 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 64685 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.199.169 with SMTP id jl9csp2542182lbc; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.28.132.212 with SMTP id g203mr9669107wmd.30.1459338289862; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from theia.denx.de (theia.denx.de. [85.214.87.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wk7si4562626wjb.244.2016.03.30.04.44.49; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de designates 85.214.87.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.214.87.163; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de designates 85.214.87.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECD4A76AB; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zmF-PjiHKq02; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from theia.denx.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F7BA74B4; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10E3A74B4 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4NGdXGHG1Ik for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:44 +0200 (CEST) X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 (only DNSBL check requested) Received: from conuserg010-v.nifty.com (conuserg010.nifty.com [202.248.44.36]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B282A749F for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:44:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from beagle.diag.org (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg010-v.nifty.com with ESMTP id u2UBiNP8019990; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:44:23 +0900 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:45:19 +0900 Message-Id: <1459338319-13883-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: remove CONFIG_ARP_TIMEOUT define X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" I no longer see the problem claimed in the comment block. Rather, the 0.5 msec timeout seems too short for some TFTP servers. Drop the CONFIG_ARM_TIMEOUT to fall back to the 5 sec timeout. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- include/configs/uniphier.h | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot diff --git a/include/configs/uniphier.h b/include/configs/uniphier.h index 963f55b..c6fc90f 100644 --- a/include/configs/uniphier.h +++ b/include/configs/uniphier.h @@ -102,14 +102,6 @@ /* Time clock 1MHz */ #define CONFIG_SYS_TIMER_RATE 1000000 -/* - * By default, ARP timeout is 5 sec. - * The first ARP request does not seem to work. - * So we need to retry ARP request anyway. - * We want to shrink the interval until the second ARP request. - */ -#define CONFIG_ARP_TIMEOUT 500UL /* 0.5 msec */ - #define CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE 1 #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS 2 #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_ONFI_DETECTION