From patchwork Tue Feb 16 08:03:49 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 61983 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.43.199 with SMTP id y7csp1515177lbl; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:03:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.25.161.6 with SMTP id k6mr8734072lfe.17.1455609816741; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:03:36 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from theia.denx.de (theia.denx.de. [85.214.87.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sq3si17334221lbb.118.2016.02.16.00.03.36; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:03:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de designates 85.214.87.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.214.87.163; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de designates 85.214.87.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA17DA754E; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ef43Iupgljhm; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from theia.denx.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0E2A752C; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76A7A74B4 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from theia.denx.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (theia.denx.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7zlg-Vr67Qd for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:21 +0100 (CET) X-policyd-weight: NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_SPAMCOP=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 (only DNSBL check requested) Received: from conuserg009-v.nifty.com (conuserg009.nifty.com [202.248.44.35]) by theia.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB414B987 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:03:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from beagle.diag.org (p14090-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.90]) (authenticated) by conuserg009-v.nifty.com with ESMTP id u1G833TT016245; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:03:05 +0900 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.90] From: Masahiro Yamada To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:03:49 +0900 Message-Id: <1455609831-30922-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1455609831-30922-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <1455609831-30922-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/4] gpio: do not include for UniPhier X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" I implemented a GPIO driver based on Driver Model for the UniPhier SoC family, but I could not find any good reason why such SoC specific GPIO headers are needed. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h index d49ad08..fe4419c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/gpio.h @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@ +#ifndef CONFIG_ARCH_UNIPHIER #include +#endif #include