From patchwork Tue Apr 26 08:22:15 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" X-Patchwork-Id: 567797 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E06B8C4167B for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 09:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244967AbiDZJL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 05:11:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36994 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346497AbiDZJIX (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 05:08:23 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E75B179EB3; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 01:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4950B81A2F; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FDE8C385AC; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 08:49:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1650962948; bh=k17Mqw6A4UZC3b8R32if962zqUOtfW1EQQgvv4gcQ8I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KuGhf3/PCb0k02G5fLssntv7Nkd6PKXJfpXViebTFEuC1KfqN1eWq4OHgsrtruE49 0g1mr2s2UNb12Goadpdeg2MNQQWPkZu4iOfWi3tH77SCe/hl5Sa6yG/Sz189SAAfBF iqQQT5TGcQlYRIJcZFxz+WjzpMy755qBuM6kvYQk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Tso , stable@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 5.17 140/146] ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no sense Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:22:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20220426081753.993990089@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.0 In-Reply-To: <20220426081750.051179617@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220426081750.051179617@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Theodore Ts'o commit 85d825dbf4899a69407338bae462a59aa9a37326 upstream. If the file system does not use bigalloc, calculating the overhead is cheap, so force the recalculation of the overhead so we don't have to trust the precalculated overhead in the superblock. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/ext4/super.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -5268,9 +5268,18 @@ no_journal: * Get the # of file system overhead blocks from the * superblock if present. */ - if (es->s_overhead_clusters) - sbi->s_overhead = le32_to_cpu(es->s_overhead_clusters); - else { + sbi->s_overhead = le32_to_cpu(es->s_overhead_clusters); + /* ignore the precalculated value if it is ridiculous */ + if (sbi->s_overhead > ext4_blocks_count(es)) + sbi->s_overhead = 0; + /* + * If the bigalloc feature is not enabled recalculating the + * overhead doesn't take long, so we might as well just redo + * it to make sure we are using the correct value. + */ + if (!ext4_has_feature_bigalloc(sb)) + sbi->s_overhead = 0; + if (sbi->s_overhead == 0) { err = ext4_calculate_overhead(sb); if (err) goto failed_mount_wq;