From patchwork Tue Apr 5 07:13:15 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 558303 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E84C433F5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231549AbiDEHob (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:44:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56490 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232103AbiDEHoV (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2022 03:44:21 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1523796810; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F8E61607; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8926EC340EE; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 07:40:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1649144450; bh=eg+x736kktKum9CLjZaUEIRNFMQuDWNp3YHLcTRCvkk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wJ13XpBs+oxt00993qZiCiDi52xwxHBbftj9xH96kRA+oWBg/ftlT+69sRtx5qelS CxwvriW5ueVcvi1ac1AZKPzOcJCR0v05MsQq1HnOP1G5Qrt6cbthKyiVKY5YIG2jXp 9vA5fNqaENs5J21gAiDWjp56r6iVn7Pg0CPHtaJk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Berger , Tianjia Zhang , Eric Biggers , Vitaly Chikunov , Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: [PATCH 5.17 0048/1126] KEYS: asymmetric: properly validate hash_algo and encoding Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:13:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20220405070408.974352539@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.1 In-Reply-To: <20220405070407.513532867@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220405070407.513532867@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Biggers commit 590bfb57b2328951d5833979e7ca1d5fde2e609a upstream. It is insecure to allow arbitrary hash algorithms and signature encodings to be used with arbitrary signature algorithms. Notably, ECDSA, ECRDSA, and SM2 all sign/verify raw hash values and don't disambiguate between different hash algorithms like RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 padding does. Therefore, they need to be restricted to certain sets of hash algorithms (ideally just one, but in practice small sets are used). Additionally, the encoding is an integral part of modern signature algorithms, and is not supposed to vary. Therefore, tighten the checks of hash_algo and encoding done by software_key_determine_akcipher(). Also rearrange the parameters to software_key_determine_akcipher() to put the public_key first, as this is the most important parameter and it often determines everything else. Fixes: 299f561a6693 ("x509: Add support for parsing x509 certs with ECDSA keys") Fixes: 215525639631 ("X.509: support OSCCA SM2-with-SM3 certificate verification") Fixes: 0d7a78643f69 ("crypto: ecrdsa - add EC-RDSA (GOST 34.10) algorithm") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Stefan Berger Tested-by: Tianjia Zhang Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Reviewed-by: Vitaly Chikunov Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c @@ -60,39 +60,83 @@ static void public_key_destroy(void *pay } /* - * Determine the crypto algorithm name. + * Given a public_key, and an encoding and hash_algo to be used for signing + * and/or verification with that key, determine the name of the corresponding + * akcipher algorithm. Also check that encoding and hash_algo are allowed. */ -static -int software_key_determine_akcipher(const char *encoding, - const char *hash_algo, - const struct public_key *pkey, - char alg_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME]) +static int +software_key_determine_akcipher(const struct public_key *pkey, + const char *encoding, const char *hash_algo, + char alg_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME]) { int n; - if (strcmp(encoding, "pkcs1") == 0) { - /* The data wangled by the RSA algorithm is typically padded - * and encoded in some manner, such as EMSA-PKCS1-1_5 [RFC3447 - * sec 8.2]. + if (!encoding) + return -EINVAL; + + if (strcmp(pkey->pkey_algo, "rsa") == 0) { + /* + * RSA signatures usually use EMSA-PKCS1-1_5 [RFC3447 sec 8.2]. + */ + if (strcmp(encoding, "pkcs1") == 0) { + if (!hash_algo) + n = snprintf(alg_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, + "pkcs1pad(%s)", + pkey->pkey_algo); + else + n = snprintf(alg_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, + "pkcs1pad(%s,%s)", + pkey->pkey_algo, hash_algo); + return n >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME ? -EINVAL : 0; + } + if (strcmp(encoding, "raw") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + /* + * Raw RSA cannot differentiate between different hash + * algorithms. + */ + if (hash_algo) + return -EINVAL; + } else if (strncmp(pkey->pkey_algo, "ecdsa", 5) == 0) { + if (strcmp(encoding, "x962") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + /* + * ECDSA signatures are taken over a raw hash, so they don't + * differentiate between different hash algorithms. That means + * that the verifier should hard-code a specific hash algorithm. + * Unfortunately, in practice ECDSA is used with multiple SHAs, + * so we have to allow all of them and not just one. */ if (!hash_algo) - n = snprintf(alg_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, - "pkcs1pad(%s)", - pkey->pkey_algo); - else - n = snprintf(alg_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, - "pkcs1pad(%s,%s)", - pkey->pkey_algo, hash_algo); - return n >= CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME ? -EINVAL : 0; - } - - if (strcmp(encoding, "raw") == 0 || - strcmp(encoding, "x962") == 0) { - strcpy(alg_name, pkey->pkey_algo); - return 0; + return -EINVAL; + if (strcmp(hash_algo, "sha1") != 0 && + strcmp(hash_algo, "sha224") != 0 && + strcmp(hash_algo, "sha256") != 0 && + strcmp(hash_algo, "sha384") != 0 && + strcmp(hash_algo, "sha512") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + } else if (strcmp(pkey->pkey_algo, "sm2") == 0) { + if (strcmp(encoding, "raw") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + if (!hash_algo) + return -EINVAL; + if (strcmp(hash_algo, "sm3") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + } else if (strcmp(pkey->pkey_algo, "ecrdsa") == 0) { + if (strcmp(encoding, "raw") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + if (!hash_algo) + return -EINVAL; + if (strcmp(hash_algo, "streebog256") != 0 && + strcmp(hash_algo, "streebog512") != 0) + return -EINVAL; + } else { + /* Unknown public key algorithm */ + return -ENOPKG; } - - return -ENOPKG; + if (strscpy(alg_name, pkey->pkey_algo, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME) < 0) + return -EINVAL; + return 0; } static u8 *pkey_pack_u32(u8 *dst, u32 val) @@ -113,9 +157,8 @@ static int software_key_query(const stru u8 *key, *ptr; int ret, len; - ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(params->encoding, - params->hash_algo, - pkey, alg_name); + ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(pkey, params->encoding, + params->hash_algo, alg_name); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -179,9 +222,8 @@ static int software_key_eds_op(struct ke pr_devel("==>%s()\n", __func__); - ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(params->encoding, - params->hash_algo, - pkey, alg_name); + ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(pkey, params->encoding, + params->hash_algo, alg_name); if (ret < 0) return ret; @@ -340,9 +382,8 @@ int public_key_verify_signature(const st return -EKEYREJECTED; } - ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(sig->encoding, - sig->hash_algo, - pkey, alg_name); + ret = software_key_determine_akcipher(pkey, sig->encoding, + sig->hash_algo, alg_name); if (ret < 0) return ret;