=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
5.13.0-CI-Patchwork_20515+ #1 Tainted: G W
-----------------------------
debugfs_test/1101 is trying to lock:
ffff888132d901a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{4:4}
3 locks held by debugfs_test/1101:
#0: ffff88810fdffc90 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
seq_read_iter+0x53/0x3b0
#1: ffff888132d90240 (&dev->filelist_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
drm_clients_info+0x63/0x2a0
#2: ffffffff82734220 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at:
drm_clients_info+0x1b1/0x2a0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 8 PID: 1101 Comm: debugfs_test Tainted: G W
5.13.0-CI-Patchwork_20515+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corporation CometLake Client Platform/CometLake S
UDIMM (ERB/CRB), BIOS CMLSFWR1.R00.1263.D00.1906260926 06/26/2019
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
__lock_acquire.cold.78+0x2af/0x2ca
lock_acquire+0xd3/0x300
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? __mutex_lock+0x76/0x970
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xbf/0x130
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
? drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
drm_is_current_master+0x1e/0x50
drm_clients_info+0x107/0x2a0
seq_read_iter+0x178/0x3b0
seq_read+0x104/0x150
full_proxy_read+0x4e/0x80
vfs_read+0xa5/0x1b0
ksys_read+0x5a/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210712043508.11584-3-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_debugfs.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
mutex_lock(&dev->filelist_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(priv, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
struct task_struct *task;
+ bool is_current_master = drm_is_current_master(priv);
rcu_read_lock(); /* locks pid_task()->comm */
task = pid_task(priv->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ static int drm_clients_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
pid_vnr(priv->pid),
priv->minor->index,
- drm_is_current_master(priv) ? 'y' : 'n',
+ is_current_master ? 'y' : 'n',
priv->authenticated ? 'y' : 'n',
from_kuid_munged(seq_user_ns(m), uid),
priv->magic);
From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> [ Upstream commit 5eff9585de220cdd131237f5665db5e6c6bdf590 ] Inside drm_clients_info, the rcu_read_lock is held to lock pid_task()->comm. However, within this protected section, a call to drm_is_current_master is made, which involves a mutex lock in a future patch. However, this is illegal because the mutex lock might block while in the RCU read-side critical section. Since drm_is_current_master isn't protected by rcu_read_lock, we avoid this by moving it out of the RCU critical section. The following report came from intel-gfx ci's igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries testcase: