diff mbox series

[5.10,264/530] spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: fix use-after-free in zynqmp_qspi_exec_op

Message ID 20210512144828.501430855@linuxfoundation.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

gregkh@linuxfoundation.org May 12, 2021, 2:46 p.m. UTC
From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>

[ Upstream commit a2c5bedb2d55dd27c642c7b9fb6886d7ad7bdb58 ]

When handling op->addr, it is using the buffer "tmpbuf" which has been
freed. This will trigger a use-after-free KASAN warning. Let's use
temporary variables to store op->addr.val and op->cmd.opcode to fix
this issue.

Fixes: 1c26372e5aa9 ("spi: spi-zynqmp-gqspi: Update driver to use spi-mem framework")
Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@windriver.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416004652.2975446-5-quanyang.wang@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c | 14 ++++----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Pavel Machek May 16, 2021, 8:34 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi!

> When handling op->addr, it is using the buffer "tmpbuf" which has been

> freed. This will trigger a use-after-free KASAN warning. Let's use

> temporary variables to store op->addr.val and op->cmd.opcode to fix

> this issue.


I believe this is "cure worse than a disassease".

> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c

> @@ -926,8 +926,9 @@ static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,

>  	struct zynqmp_qspi *xqspi = spi_controller_get_devdata

>  				    (mem->spi->master);

>  	int err = 0, i;

> -	u8 *tmpbuf;

>  	u32 genfifoentry = 0;

> +	u16 opcode = op->cmd.opcode;

> +	u64 opaddr;

>  

>  	dev_dbg(xqspi->dev, "cmd:%#x mode:%d.%d.%d.%d\n",

>  		op->cmd.opcode, op->cmd.buswidth, op->addr.buswidth,

> @@ -940,14 +941,8 @@ static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,

>  	genfifoentry |= xqspi->genfifobus;

>  

>  	if (op->cmd.opcode) {

> -		tmpbuf = kzalloc(op->cmd.nbytes, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);

> -		if (!tmpbuf) {

> -			mutex_unlock(&xqspi->op_lock);

> -			return -ENOMEM;

> -		}

> -		tmpbuf[0] = op->cmd.opcode;

>  		reinit_completion(&xqspi->data_completion);

> -		xqspi->txbuf = tmpbuf;

> +		xqspi->txbuf = &opcode;

>  		xqspi->rxbuf = NULL;

>  		xqspi->bytes_to_transfer = op->cmd.nbytes;

>  		xqspi->bytes_to_receive = 0;


So this replaces "op->cmd.nbytes" bytes big DMA buffer with 2 bytes on
stack.

First, if op->cmd.nbytes is > 2, DMA will overrun that buffer. That
can't be healthy.

Second, you really should not run DMA from on-stack buffers.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
index d6ac8fe145a1..2a0be16b2eb0 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-zynqmp-gqspi.c
@@ -926,8 +926,9 @@  static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
 	struct zynqmp_qspi *xqspi = spi_controller_get_devdata
 				    (mem->spi->master);
 	int err = 0, i;
-	u8 *tmpbuf;
 	u32 genfifoentry = 0;
+	u16 opcode = op->cmd.opcode;
+	u64 opaddr;
 
 	dev_dbg(xqspi->dev, "cmd:%#x mode:%d.%d.%d.%d\n",
 		op->cmd.opcode, op->cmd.buswidth, op->addr.buswidth,
@@ -940,14 +941,8 @@  static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
 	genfifoentry |= xqspi->genfifobus;
 
 	if (op->cmd.opcode) {
-		tmpbuf = kzalloc(op->cmd.nbytes, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
-		if (!tmpbuf) {
-			mutex_unlock(&xqspi->op_lock);
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		}
-		tmpbuf[0] = op->cmd.opcode;
 		reinit_completion(&xqspi->data_completion);
-		xqspi->txbuf = tmpbuf;
+		xqspi->txbuf = &opcode;
 		xqspi->rxbuf = NULL;
 		xqspi->bytes_to_transfer = op->cmd.nbytes;
 		xqspi->bytes_to_receive = 0;
@@ -961,13 +956,12 @@  static int zynqmp_qspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem,
 		if (!wait_for_completion_timeout
 		    (&xqspi->data_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(1000))) {
 			err = -ETIMEDOUT;
-			kfree(tmpbuf);
 			goto return_err;
 		}
-		kfree(tmpbuf);
 	}
 
 	if (op->addr.nbytes) {
+		xqspi->txbuf = &opaddr;
 		for (i = 0; i < op->addr.nbytes; i++) {
 			*(((u8 *)xqspi->txbuf) + i) = op->addr.val >>
 					(8 * (op->addr.nbytes - i - 1));