From patchwork Fri Mar 5 12:20:44 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 395050 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B280C43333 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D426503C for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232021AbhCEM3C (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:29:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37624 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232076AbhCEM2o (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 07:28:44 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0C5565013; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 12:28:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1614947324; bh=KKFEiqyIJJSnu8U2sU9rD4d5UqVxif6VaTUmGfcFVes=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tpfT2QUeq511idDhuL//+v55bio+zuC61BciZi9yxH/lzum4o4C2PQKUmUzaNcg2c M+4vt5N4v8UH6zQw+0CzPkbP+CgZ+L7ulKqZfeyzvAi2QiWoQaXBx3xw6ddJoFTDop bQ/KmwqFYMmPD08dsgYFFzLscGwfm2OLVAsYJDOU= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean , Nikolay Aleksandrov , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.10 025/102] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:20:44 +0100 Message-Id: <20210305120904.522134789@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 In-Reply-To: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210305120903.276489876@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Vladimir Oltean commit 8043c845b63a2dd88daf2d2d268a33e1872800f0 upstream. Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that), so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of functionality. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170605092043.3523-3-jiri@resnulli.us/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20170608064428.4785-3-jiri@resnulli.us/ Fixes: 3922285d96e7 ("net: bridge: Add support for offloading port attributes") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_sysfs_if.c @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ static BRPORT_ATTR(_name, 0644, \ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, unsigned long v, unsigned long mask) { - unsigned long flags; - - flags = p->flags; + unsigned long flags = p->flags; + int err; if (v) flags |= mask; @@ -65,6 +64,10 @@ static int store_flag(struct net_bridge_ flags &= ~mask; if (flags != p->flags) { + err = br_switchdev_set_port_flag(p, flags, mask); + if (err) + return err; + p->flags = flags; br_port_flags_change(p, mask); }