From patchwork Mon Nov 9 12:54:42 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 322741 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C106CC388F7 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F38E206D8 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:16:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604927790; bh=bHymZLqrSXJSBTuyoy+7+TUo85iP5i7JQlwErl6ORZM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=zTL9ZqsrbhGq81D9hRHmsKoeUZm+EoX9ZunNOhSvMGVyTopcrlcY0PGsXMekXt3LQ pOJRaOAmLjXS1QbD1jYr5Ae3t366FwS7BuWHFid+ta+u0sWgvuqV3xTrYc5153z30D AlGdK0zBxgqpqzMQIIBa0NvrJAT4IpntuVlA/pBw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732069AbgKINQ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:16:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43442 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732251AbgKINQ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:16:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 02F57206D8; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:16:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604927785; bh=bHymZLqrSXJSBTuyoy+7+TUo85iP5i7JQlwErl6ORZM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Pjqv3OylFcVrGQtg0+sExhHfPnhpFKCUkNOFfdm2PwrsdQ7A4+59Tr6mHgmvwDk9f N/9lmIxFaZffFbMimPXDCSq4h4C8NT0yqdZKNnnz6pPOZFdYlCecvKwkUKSIh2nvpr 2LK8gWEqodf6Q0LZwLXa8DfiTdFpIMLijaEbYF9U= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lyude Paul , Ben Skeggs Subject: [PATCH 5.9 020/133] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 13:54:42 +0100 Message-Id: <20201109125031.689636633@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20201109125030.706496283@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20201109125030.706496283@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Lyude Paul commit 24d9422e26ea75118acf00172f83417c296f5b5f upstream. Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier offset programmed before you can call NV507D_GET_CAPABILITIES." So, let's fix this by doing that, and also perform an update afterwards to prevent racing with the GPU when reading capabilities. v2: * Don't just program the DMA notifier offset, make sure to actually perform an update v3: * Don't call UPDATE() * Actually read the correct notifier fields, as apparently the CAPABILITIES_DONE field lives in a different location than the main NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1 field. As well, 907d+ use a different CAPABILITIES_DONE field then pre-907d cards. v4: * Don't forget to check the return value of core507d_read_caps() v5: * Get rid of NV50_DISP_CAPS_NTFY[14], use NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY * Disable notifier after calling GetCapabilities() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Fixes: 4a2cb4181b07 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Probe SOR and PIOR caps for DP interlacing support") Cc: # v5.8+ Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core.h | 2 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core907d.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core917d.c | 2 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl507d.h | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl907d.h | 4 + 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core.h @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ int core507d_new_(const struct nv50_core struct nv50_core **); int core507d_init(struct nv50_core *); void core507d_ntfy_init(struct nouveau_bo *, u32); +int core507d_read_caps(struct nv50_disp *disp); int core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *, struct nv50_disp *); int core507d_ntfy_wait_done(struct nouveau_bo *, u32, struct nvif_device *); int core507d_update(struct nv50_core *, u32 *, bool); @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ extern const struct nv50_outp_func pior5 int core827d_new(struct nouveau_drm *, s32, struct nv50_core **); int core907d_new(struct nouveau_drm *, s32, struct nv50_core **); +int core907d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp); extern const struct nv50_outp_func dac907d; extern const struct nv50_outp_func sor907d; --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c @@ -78,19 +78,56 @@ core507d_ntfy_init(struct nouveau_bo *bo } int -core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp) +core507d_read_caps(struct nv50_disp *disp) { struct nvif_push *push = disp->core->chan.push; int ret; - if ((ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2))) + ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 6); + if (ret) return ret; + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, + NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, MODE, WRITE) | + NVVAL(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, OFFSET, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY >> 2) | + NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, ENABLE)); + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, GET_CAPABILITIES, 0x00000000); + + PUSH_MTHD(push, NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, + NVDEF(NV507D, SET_NOTIFIER_CONTROL, NOTIFY, DISABLE)); + return PUSH_KICK(push); } int +core507d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp) +{ + struct nv50_core *core = disp->core; + struct nouveau_bo *bo = disp->sync; + s64 time; + int ret; + + NVBO_WR32(bo, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY, NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1, CAPABILITIES_1, + NVDEF(NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1, CAPABILITIES_1, DONE, FALSE)); + + ret = core507d_read_caps(disp); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + time = nvif_msec(core->chan.base.device, 2000ULL, + if (NVBO_TD32(bo, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY, + NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1, CAPABILITIES_1, DONE, ==, TRUE)) + break; + usleep_range(1, 2); + ); + if (time < 0) + NV_ERROR(drm, "core caps notifier timeout\n"); + + return 0; +} + +int core507d_init(struct nv50_core *core) { struct nvif_push *push = core->chan.push; --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core907d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core907d.c @@ -22,11 +22,45 @@ #include "core.h" #include "head.h" +#include +#include + +#include + +#include "nouveau_bo.h" + +int +core907d_caps_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct nv50_disp *disp) +{ + struct nv50_core *core = disp->core; + struct nouveau_bo *bo = disp->sync; + s64 time; + int ret; + + NVBO_WR32(bo, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY, NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3, CAPABILITIES_4, + NVDEF(NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3, CAPABILITIES_4, DONE, FALSE)); + + ret = core507d_read_caps(disp); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + time = nvif_msec(core->chan.base.device, 2000ULL, + if (NVBO_TD32(bo, NV50_DISP_CORE_NTFY, + NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3, CAPABILITIES_4, DONE, ==, TRUE)) + break; + usleep_range(1, 2); + ); + if (time < 0) + NV_ERROR(drm, "core caps notifier timeout\n"); + + return 0; +} + static const struct nv50_core_func core907d = { .init = core507d_init, .ntfy_init = core507d_ntfy_init, - .caps_init = core507d_caps_init, + .caps_init = core907d_caps_init, .ntfy_wait_done = core507d_ntfy_wait_done, .update = core507d_update, .head = &head907d, --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core917d.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core917d.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static const struct nv50_core_func core917d = { .init = core507d_init, .ntfy_init = core507d_ntfy_init, - .caps_init = core507d_caps_init, + .caps_init = core907d_caps_init, .ntfy_wait_done = core507d_ntfy_wait_done, .update = core507d_update, .head = &head917d, --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl507d.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl507d.h @@ -32,7 +32,10 @@ #define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_COMPLETION_0_DONE_TRUE 0x00000001 #define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_COMPLETION_0_R0 15:1 #define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_COMPLETION_0_TIMESTAMP 29:16 - +#define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_CAPABILITIES_1 0x00000001 +#define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_CAPABILITIES_1_DONE 0:0 +#define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_CAPABILITIES_1_DONE_FALSE 0x00000000 +#define NV_DISP_CORE_NOTIFIER_1_CAPABILITIES_1_DONE_TRUE 0x00000001 // class methods #define NV507D_UPDATE (0x00000080) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl907d.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvhw/class/cl907d.h @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ #ifndef _cl907d_h_ #define _cl907d_h_ +#define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_4 0x00000004 +#define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_4_DONE 0:0 +#define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_4_DONE_FALSE 0x00000000 +#define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_4_DONE_TRUE 0x00000001 #define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_CAP_SOR0_20 0x00000014 #define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_CAP_SOR0_20_SINGLE_LVDS18 0:0 #define NV907D_CORE_NOTIFIER_3_CAPABILITIES_CAP_SOR0_20_SINGLE_LVDS18_FALSE 0x00000000