Hi! > From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> > > [ Upstream commit fc9eec4d643597cf4cb2fef17d48110e677610da ] > > Fix missing 'kfree_const(cell->name)' when call to > nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell() in several places: > > * after nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell() failed during > nvmem_add_cells() > > * during nvmem_device_cell_{read,write} when cell->name is > kstrdup'ed() without calling kfree_const() at the end, but > really there is no reason to do that 'dup, because the cell > instance is allocated on the stack for some short period to be > read/write without exposing it to the caller. > > So the new nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup() helper is introduced > which is used to convert cell_info -> cell without name duplication as > a lighweight version of nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(). > > Fixes: e2a5402ec7c6 ("nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis.") There's something very wrong here. > index 30c040786fde2..54204d550fc22 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c > @@ -326,9 +326,9 @@ static void nvmem_cell_add(struct nvmem_cell *cell) > mutex_unlock(&nvmem_cells_mutex); > } > > -static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, > - const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, > - struct nvmem_cell *cell) > +static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, > + const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, > + struct nvmem_cell *cell) > { > cell->nvmem = nvmem; > cell->offset = info->offset; > @@ -345,13 +345,30 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, > if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) { > dev_err(&nvmem->dev, > "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n", > - cell->name, nvmem->stride); > + cell->name ?: "<unknown>", nvmem->stride); > return -EINVAL; > } > > return 0; > } We rename call from .._cell to .._cell_nodup, but it did not have the kstrdup_const() in the first place! > +static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, > + const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, > + struct nvmem_cell *cell) > +{ > + int err; > + > + err = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(nvmem, info, cell); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + cell->name = kstrdup_const(info->name, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!cell->name) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + return 0; > +} So now we introduce an allocation, but we don't have a place to free it. In mainline, it is freed in nvmem_cell_drop(), but 4.19 does not have a free there. Best regards, Pavel
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 09:12:34PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: >Hi! > >> From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> >> >> [ Upstream commit fc9eec4d643597cf4cb2fef17d48110e677610da ] >> >> Fix missing 'kfree_const(cell->name)' when call to >> nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell() in several places: >> >> * after nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell() failed during >> nvmem_add_cells() >> >> * during nvmem_device_cell_{read,write} when cell->name is >> kstrdup'ed() without calling kfree_const() at the end, but >> really there is no reason to do that 'dup, because the cell >> instance is allocated on the stack for some short period to be >> read/write without exposing it to the caller. >> >> So the new nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup() helper is introduced >> which is used to convert cell_info -> cell without name duplication as >> a lighweight version of nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(). >> >> Fixes: e2a5402ec7c6 ("nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis.") > >There's something very wrong here. Right, looks like it actually fixes 16bb7abc4a6b ("nvmem: core: fix memory abort in cleanup path"). I'll just drop this commit.
diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c index 30c040786fde2..54204d550fc22 100644 --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c @@ -326,9 +326,9 @@ static void nvmem_cell_add(struct nvmem_cell *cell) mutex_unlock(&nvmem_cells_mutex); } -static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, - const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, - struct nvmem_cell *cell) +static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, + const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, + struct nvmem_cell *cell) { cell->nvmem = nvmem; cell->offset = info->offset; @@ -345,13 +345,30 @@ static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, if (!IS_ALIGNED(cell->offset, nvmem->stride)) { dev_err(&nvmem->dev, "cell %s unaligned to nvmem stride %d\n", - cell->name, nvmem->stride); + cell->name ?: "<unknown>", nvmem->stride); return -EINVAL; } return 0; } +static int nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, + const struct nvmem_cell_info *info, + struct nvmem_cell *cell) +{ + int err; + + err = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(nvmem, info, cell); + if (err) + return err; + + cell->name = kstrdup_const(info->name, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!cell->name) + return -ENOMEM; + + return 0; +} + /** * nvmem_add_cells() - Add cell information to an nvmem device * @@ -1265,7 +1282,7 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, if (!nvmem) return -EINVAL; - rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(nvmem, info, &cell); + rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(nvmem, info, &cell); if (rc) return rc; @@ -1295,7 +1312,7 @@ int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, if (!nvmem) return -EINVAL; - rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell(nvmem, info, &cell); + rc = nvmem_cell_info_to_nvmem_cell_nodup(nvmem, info, &cell); if (rc) return rc;