diff mbox series

[4.19,21/78] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd

Message ID 20200915140634.607762500@linuxfoundation.org
State New
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Greg KH Sept. 15, 2020, 2:12 p.m. UTC 
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>

[ Upstream commit f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 ]

When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 01acb6e533655..c4b6e29c07192 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@  static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 	rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
 	if (rc) {
 		WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
-		return rc;
+		goto free_skb_resp;
 	}
 
 	rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,