@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ void page_counter_charge(struct page_cou
* This is indeed racy, but we can live with some
* inaccuracy in the watermark.
*/
- if (new > c->watermark)
- c->watermark = new;
+ if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark))
+ WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new);
}
}
@@ -119,9 +119,10 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
/*
* This is racy, but we can live with some
- * inaccuracy in the failcnt.
+ * inaccuracy in the failcnt which is only used
+ * to report stats.
*/
- c->failcnt++;
+ data_race(c->failcnt++);
*fail = c;
goto failed;
}
@@ -130,8 +131,8 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
* Just like with failcnt, we can live with some
* inaccuracy in the watermark.
*/
- if (new > c->watermark)
- c->watermark = new;
+ if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark))
+ WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new);
}
return true;