From patchwork Tue Sep 1 15:09:48 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 264716 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D767C433E2 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E473D206EB for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:41:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598974902; bh=4YAmf4dSSuVzZiazHPkKQCjkpbtJsu85PXPDdQOTguM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=ZWsYHLtD3v60//sVrdBBkRfXPSfoLDUyI0F/PmA1w+nRBMLYapeE4aGc7zdJ6atPW +US3fmGB49kHZ0936fgZMkmAQ9j+UM0flmTYUrHEZlgJazBAI8+RErbaSRAkPUS7QM rEKZ9dsn6zK0+9IfW2Nt925a0Za7ZpFXYUhStWlE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728709AbgIAPlj (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:41:39 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53926 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731532AbgIAPlh (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 11:41:37 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF15B206EF; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:41:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598974896; bh=4YAmf4dSSuVzZiazHPkKQCjkpbtJsu85PXPDdQOTguM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gqE52FrLDolxgcj08vAKUo5EL40l4DYe+gpHGn3aRsnyLkR6bkc4rR9hABKA3G9rD 4IVd/sk8oLzD9tRB4KYHzcJ0vSfCgMz5/FT43OMAR42fcnIEFT4NLLPRt/CDhHleAM sMAWDqltoNsJ1YYX6IB8XvBhqRv7/lXNrb3G/EDM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.8 132/255] selftests/bpf: Fix btf_dump test cases on 32-bit arches Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 17:09:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20200901151007.041112548@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200901151000.800754757@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200901151000.800754757@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Andrii Nakryiko [ Upstream commit eed7818adf03e874994b966aa33bc00204dd275a ] Fix btf_dump test cases by hard-coding BPF's pointer size of 8 bytes for cases where it's impossible to deterimne the pointer size (no long type in BTF). In cases where it's known, validate libbpf correctly determines it as 8. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200813204945.1020225-6-andriin@fb.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 27 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c index cb33a7ee4e04f..39fb81d9daeb5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c @@ -12,15 +12,16 @@ void btf_dump_printf(void *ctx, const char *fmt, va_list args) static struct btf_dump_test_case { const char *name; const char *file; + bool known_ptr_sz; struct btf_dump_opts opts; } btf_dump_test_cases[] = { - {"btf_dump: syntax", "btf_dump_test_case_syntax", {}}, - {"btf_dump: ordering", "btf_dump_test_case_ordering", {}}, - {"btf_dump: padding", "btf_dump_test_case_padding", {}}, - {"btf_dump: packing", "btf_dump_test_case_packing", {}}, - {"btf_dump: bitfields", "btf_dump_test_case_bitfields", {}}, - {"btf_dump: multidim", "btf_dump_test_case_multidim", {}}, - {"btf_dump: namespacing", "btf_dump_test_case_namespacing", {}}, + {"btf_dump: syntax", "btf_dump_test_case_syntax", true, {}}, + {"btf_dump: ordering", "btf_dump_test_case_ordering", false, {}}, + {"btf_dump: padding", "btf_dump_test_case_padding", true, {}}, + {"btf_dump: packing", "btf_dump_test_case_packing", true, {}}, + {"btf_dump: bitfields", "btf_dump_test_case_bitfields", true, {}}, + {"btf_dump: multidim", "btf_dump_test_case_multidim", false, {}}, + {"btf_dump: namespacing", "btf_dump_test_case_namespacing", false, {}}, }; static int btf_dump_all_types(const struct btf *btf, @@ -62,6 +63,18 @@ static int test_btf_dump_case(int n, struct btf_dump_test_case *t) goto done; } + /* tests with t->known_ptr_sz have no "long" or "unsigned long" type, + * so it's impossible to determine correct pointer size; but if they + * do, it should be 8 regardless of host architecture, becaues BPF + * target is always 64-bit + */ + if (!t->known_ptr_sz) { + btf__set_pointer_size(btf, 8); + } else { + CHECK(btf__pointer_size(btf) != 8, "ptr_sz", "exp %d, got %zu\n", + 8, btf__pointer_size(btf)); + } + snprintf(out_file, sizeof(out_file), "/tmp/%s.output.XXXXXX", t->file); fd = mkstemp(out_file); if (CHECK(fd < 0, "create_tmp", "failed to create file: %d\n", fd)) {