From patchwork Mon Aug 17 15:15:55 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 266381 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56387C433DF for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F8B20772 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:07:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597680450; bh=Wu7bjlen7VaDzAEZ30fkPJc0jKth6xZTnBln8GLVJdE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=F1JedxxJZHmrllhKdNN+m0N3NR9PPVC+Ug68ORvmtbxK/eCiOipk2gs/5xSBG54me g5MyPqhx4LHXWUT5Xh5pRmcGDxOUn3f6G/eA6mSW6ZGq25XxUoDPnIzJZCTDc5hnLE DdoIQ6/EITR7J6hLb0tbylbkGuKhFbNhRRiHaZ04= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388408AbgHQQHX (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:07:23 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53870 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388389AbgHQQF5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:05:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D1EC20882; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:05:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597680356; bh=Wu7bjlen7VaDzAEZ30fkPJc0jKth6xZTnBln8GLVJdE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lTFITjQ5lcxctN2+WB86iCUS24O3gE7LL4urIUUS01LukGYGoDLs+pvJyRXArQeGn MoSIde24hkKLMWfJA9JZaUW5dn3XtBV6jdoBzQ4Zw0rQdzelUp1iWNSg8P0ZdLMu0l kl7k0pr311G39qPA+ZIW5WSr7cEMWqZayY/IpuHg= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens , Mark Brown , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 154/270] spi: lantiq-ssc: Fix warning by using WQ_MEM_RECLAIM Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:15:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20200817143803.501300258@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200817143755.807583758@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200817143755.807583758@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Hauke Mehrtens [ Upstream commit ba3548cf29616b58c93bbaffc3d636898d009858 ] The lantiq-ssc driver uses internally an own workqueue to wait till the data is not only written out of the FIFO but really written to the wire. This workqueue is flushed while the SPI subsystem is working in some other system workqueue. The system workqueue is marked as WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, but the workqueue in the lantiq-ssc driver does not use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for now. Add this flag too to prevent this warning. This fixes the following warning: [ 2.975956] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 17 at kernel/workqueue.c:2614 check_flush_dependency+0x168/0x184 [ 2.984752] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM kblockd:blk_mq_run_work_fn is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM 1e100800.spi:0x0 Fixes: 891b7c5fbf61 ("mtd_blkdevs: convert to blk-mq") Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717215648.20522-1-hauke@hauke-m.de Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c index 55394bdbc5a30..f9bc1705c0d4d 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lantiq-ssc.c @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int lantiq_ssc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(2, 8) | SPI_BPW_MASK(16) | SPI_BPW_MASK(32); - spi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(dev), 0); + spi->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(dev_name(dev), WQ_MEM_RECLAIM); if (!spi->wq) { err = -ENOMEM; goto err_clk_put;