From patchwork Tue Jun 23 19:58:04 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 223449 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE562C433DF for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A732D2064B for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:33:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592944402; bh=eF2Vq92pDKUB9RrOaLpiE6jRXx30XtgtWH4ah/uWtu0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=qhSvtLk8a628HwFXC+RGWgCy8tiwV+L4uyrkESJB0hvmmK1rPHAfKsHqJ25/+gHL5 5BDjNUeXBo4t0HE8+CJjgoM4d8AAxKMCdCYkECAAHgeOEv4avCFtedVrAJbzZcrlnS BcnwaDEi/5R6jyXweyBrewmN5es/oNR8R7lnoWZY= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391407AbgFWUdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:33:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54574 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2391403AbgFWUdT (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:33:19 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1DFE2064B; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 20:33:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592944399; bh=eF2Vq92pDKUB9RrOaLpiE6jRXx30XtgtWH4ah/uWtu0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R4iLwbQl+5oNzNKL51b3fk8gbncla2UXmRoggzh5tYaGqCeEDMRbVRr2cAesYWWSc CnMghYOXAfkr4xXGslp5cGWov4TCYSliZwrkNAjf4spsCcvk6WJi/0paz6K9Zp+pT5 b+ELW0Nb1B63EqzLSxYluscs+dOrfJyXX+TM7ncY= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lyude Paul , Sean Paul , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 289/314] drm/dp_mst: Increase ACT retry timeout to 3s Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:58:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20200623195352.759304796@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200623195338.770401005@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200623195338.770401005@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Lyude Paul [ Upstream commit 873a95e0d59ac06901ae261dda0b7165ffd002b8 ] Currently we only poll for an ACT up to 30 times, with a busy-wait delay of 100µs between each attempt - giving us a timeout of 2900µs. While this might seem sensible, it would appear that in certain scenarios it can take dramatically longer then that for us to receive an ACT. On one of the EVGA MST hubs that I have available, I observed said hub sometimes taking longer then a second before signalling the ACT. These delays mostly seem to occur when previous sideband messages we've sent are NAKd by the hub, however it wouldn't be particularly surprising if it's possible to reproduce times like this simply by introducing branch devices with large LCTs since payload allocations have to take effect on every downstream device up to the payload's target. So, instead of just retrying 30 times we poll for the ACT for up to 3ms, and additionally use usleep_range() to avoid a very long and rude busy-wait. Note that the previous retry count of 30 appears to have been arbitrarily chosen, as I can't find any mention of a recommended timeout or retry count for ACTs in the DisplayPort 2.0 specification. This also goes for the range we were previously using for udelay(), although I suspect that was just copied from the recommended delay for link training on SST devices. Changes since v1: * Use readx_poll_timeout() instead of open-coding timeout loop - Sean Paul Changes since v2: * Increase poll interval to 200us - Sean Paul * Print status in hex when we timeout waiting for ACT - Sean Paul Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul Fixes: ad7f8a1f9ced ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)") Cc: Sean Paul Cc: # v3.17+ Reviewed-by: Sean Paul Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200406221253.1307209-4-lyude@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index 313ca06a4fcb4..006d6087700fb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -3498,6 +3499,17 @@ static int drm_dp_dpcd_write_payload(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, return ret; } +static int do_get_act_status(struct drm_dp_aux *aux) +{ + int ret; + u8 status; + + ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS, &status); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return status; +} /** * drm_dp_check_act_status() - Check ACT handled status. @@ -3507,30 +3519,28 @@ static int drm_dp_dpcd_write_payload(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, */ int drm_dp_check_act_status(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr) { - int count = 0, ret; - u8 status; - - do { - ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(mgr->aux, - DP_PAYLOAD_TABLE_UPDATE_STATUS, - &status); - if (ret < 0) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to read payload table status %d\n", - ret); - return ret; - } - - if (status & DP_PAYLOAD_ACT_HANDLED) - break; - count++; - udelay(100); - } while (count < 30); - - if (!(status & DP_PAYLOAD_ACT_HANDLED)) { - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("failed to get ACT bit %d after %d retries\n", - status, count); + /* + * There doesn't seem to be any recommended retry count or timeout in + * the MST specification. Since some hubs have been observed to take + * over 1 second to update their payload allocations under certain + * conditions, we use a rather large timeout value. + */ + const int timeout_ms = 3000; + int ret, status; + + ret = readx_poll_timeout(do_get_act_status, mgr->aux, status, + status & DP_PAYLOAD_ACT_HANDLED || status < 0, + 200, timeout_ms * USEC_PER_MSEC); + if (ret < 0 && status >= 0) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to get ACT after %dms, last status: %02x\n", + timeout_ms, status); return -EINVAL; + } else if (status < 0) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Failed to read payload table status: %d\n", + status); + return status; } + return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_check_act_status);