From patchwork Wed Apr 22 09:57:05 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 227342 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EE3C5518A for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CDC20735 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:02:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587549765; bh=8W1vFSWViNeHhEhT1gm4IAWUjpSWJW1aRrND3K87PAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=GC0Lgol6Y6uGqjcGlSfbvoGgnfFqv1EFuAtymt4aExl5p0tAAbnn+m0HZl2FAfE4U bUxeKoDrpT/BpORQLFn5Q/HC/NxV3fp7Ch96AS+QrY+UuORUBqddALsGx6ou5ay/Gs v0LdnlgudSXh8D5t2ThVEAee/SDpyS5xJcHHrf2k= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727033AbgDVKCn (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:02:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51926 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727034AbgDVKCm (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 06:02:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3140320787; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:02:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1587549761; bh=8W1vFSWViNeHhEhT1gm4IAWUjpSWJW1aRrND3K87PAI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xzNZokm1Za+Azl4pahFDePvsuYuqxKmQwva2LgTGc+K9LjPMzLWOMww/LWHJjGW27 mVYQZVj4zUMZDLcVb+gJSyNW82/Psq6SqdiwUvCAvd6TFq51suk7kg5Zv4No0EHyxt 46JnY0T4/TlPjAyk3blu20YU1N6dAI7CXl+1j+q0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon , "Paul E. McKenney" , Davidlohr Bueso , Josh Triplett , Peter Zijlstra Subject: [PATCH 4.4 095/100] locktorture: Print ratio of acquisitions, not failures Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:57:05 +0200 Message-Id: <20200422095040.045537728@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 In-Reply-To: <20200422095022.476101261@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200422095022.476101261@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Paul E. McKenney commit 80c503e0e68fbe271680ab48f0fe29bc034b01b7 upstream. The __torture_print_stats() function in locktorture.c carefully initializes local variable "min" to statp[0].n_lock_acquired, but then compares it to statp[i].n_lock_fail. Given that the .n_lock_fail field should normally be zero, and given the initialization, it seems reasonable to display the maximum and minimum number acquisitions instead of miscomputing the maximum and minimum number of failures. This commit therefore switches from failures to acquisitions. And this turns out to be not only a day-zero bug, but entirely my own fault. I hate it when that happens! Fixes: 0af3fe1efa53 ("locktorture: Add a lock-torture kernel module") Reported-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Josh Triplett Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c @@ -655,10 +655,10 @@ static void __torture_print_stats(char * if (statp[i].n_lock_fail) fail = true; sum += statp[i].n_lock_acquired; - if (max < statp[i].n_lock_fail) - max = statp[i].n_lock_fail; - if (min > statp[i].n_lock_fail) - min = statp[i].n_lock_fail; + if (max < statp[i].n_lock_acquired) + max = statp[i].n_lock_acquired; + if (min > statp[i].n_lock_acquired) + min = statp[i].n_lock_acquired; } page += sprintf(page, "%s: Total: %lld Max/Min: %ld/%ld %s Fail: %d %s\n",