From patchwork Thu Jan 2 22:07:34 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 234512 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED26C3276C for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE0021D7D for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:56:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578005778; bh=cf7LqXwuK+XamHqx2K+hIzd74jk/0+2xFCWYwffAo54=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=r45y4InnW9FQ9nOhOegRQpwtgT5NR20oaDBw+ZtNjAoR/0V+4dwT4XxadRceGKxj2 AOAMPbht0qmPE03o7yyVPXa56xtKabhdWxUW7VTCSfEwsgD2GhlXIwsct5BmMndSXV EHwmr8By2sV5ThhK3d1QYbpEmuOT9WBPpQeOFo2k= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728334AbgABWS2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:18:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33686 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728447AbgABWS2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:18:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED3AB21582; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578003507; bh=cf7LqXwuK+XamHqx2K+hIzd74jk/0+2xFCWYwffAo54=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eXtofYWZBsGNy2wIG+iagXggLkcLkRrPko8tQV+dBwskE2r42XclAmtnv+2aFLr3U QxCzME2RBEKipru8gESL6k4oAou4p7rHyZ3mxMOGZb8MoqUZrVT84wfZboe2x+QWq4 9xVp9FFfaKJAE7pZ83Os3KC3Ki1QjJQdzRHmYARc= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Guillaume Nault , David Ahern , Hangbin Liu , "David S. Miller" Subject: [PATCH 5.4 172/191] vti: do not confirm neighbor when do pmtu update Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:07:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20200102215847.723595805@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200102215829.911231638@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200102215829.911231638@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Hangbin Liu [ Upstream commit 8247a79efa2f28b44329f363272550c1738377de ] When do IPv6 tunnel PMTU update and calls __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() in the end, we should not call dst_confirm_neigh() as there is no two-way communication. Although vti and vti6 are immune to this problem because they are IFF_NOARP interfaces, as Guillaume pointed. There is still no sense to confirm neighbour here. v5: Update commit description. v4: No change. v3: Do not remove dst_confirm_neigh, but add a new bool parameter in dst_ops.update_pmtu to control whether we should do neighbor confirm. Also split the big patch to small ones for each area. v2: Remove dst_confirm_neigh in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu. Reviewed-by: Guillaume Nault Acked-by: David Ahern Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t vti_xmit(struct sk_bu mtu = dst_mtu(dst); if (skb->len > mtu) { - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) { icmp_send(skb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED, htonl(mtu)); --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_vti.c @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ vti6_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ne mtu = dst_mtu(dst); if (skb->len > mtu) { - skb_dst_update_pmtu(skb, mtu); + skb_dst_update_pmtu_no_confirm(skb, mtu); if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6)) { if (mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU)