From patchwork Wed Aug 26 07:48:09 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lichang Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 275532 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78305C433DF for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00F4B20707 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:52:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 00F4B20707 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57844 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAqDw-0001Qz-79 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:52:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAqAS-0002yt-EV; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:48:24 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:2927 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kAqAP-00029D-Pd; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:48:24 -0400 Received: from dggemi402-hub.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F07332A389C98D44DB1F; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:48:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from DGGEMI522-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.252]) by dggemi402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.135]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 15:48:09 +0800 From: zhaolichang To: "qemu-trivial@nongnu.org" Subject: [PATCH V2 08/10] disas/: fix some comment spelling errors Thread-Topic: [PATCH V2 08/10] disas/: fix some comment spelling errors Thread-Index: AdZ7fHEkBA11lOjFQXKj/DOJbVxiRg== Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 07:48:09 +0000 Message-ID: <640CDEE67BE2784FAE298BB2517210E48AC415@dggemi522-mbs.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.174.186.227] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.187; envelope-from=zhaolichang@huawei.com; helo=huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/26 03:46:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhaolichang , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu, so I used the spellcheck tool to check the spelling errors and finally found some spelling errors in the disas folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang --- disas/hppa.c | 2 +- disas/m68k.c | 8 ++++---- disas/ppc.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.26.2.windows.1 diff --git a/disas/hppa.c b/disas/hppa.c index 2dbd1fc445..dcf9a47f34 100644 --- a/disas/hppa.c +++ b/disas/hppa.c @@ -2021,7 +2021,7 @@ print_insn_hppa (bfd_vma memaddr, disassemble_info *info) fput_fp_reg (GET_FIELD (insn, 6, 10), info); break; - /* 'fA' will not generate a space before the regsiter + /* 'fA' will not generate a space before the register name. Normally that is fine. Except that it causes problems with xmpyu which has no FP format completer. */ diff --git a/disas/m68k.c b/disas/m68k.c index 863409c67c..aefaecfbd6 100644 --- a/disas/m68k.c +++ b/disas/m68k.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct floatformat unsigned int exp_start; unsigned int exp_len; /* Bias added to a "true" exponent to form the biased exponent. It - is intentionally signed as, otherwize, -exp_bias can turn into a + is intentionally signed as, otherwise, -exp_bias can turn into a very large number (e.g., given the exp_bias of 0x3fff and a 64 bit long, the equation (long)(1 - exp_bias) evaluates to 4294950914) instead of -16382). */ @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ struct m68k_opcode_alias and remaining 3 bits of register shifted 9 bits in first word. Indicate upper/lower in 1 bit shifted 7 bits in second word. Use with `R' or `u' format. - n `m' withouth upper/lower indication. (For M[S]ACx; 4 bits split + n `m' without upper/lower indication. (For M[S]ACx; 4 bits split with MSB shifted 6 bits in first word and remaining 3 bits of register shifted 9 bits in first word. No upper/lower indication is done.) Use with `R' or `u' format. @@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ fetch_arg (unsigned char *buffer, /* Check if an EA is valid for a particular code. This is required for the EMAC instructions since the type of source address determines - if it is a EMAC-load instruciton if the EA is mode 2-5, otherwise it + if it is a EMAC-load instruction if the EA is mode 2-5, otherwise it is a non-load EMAC instruction and the bits mean register Ry. A similar case exists for the movem instructions where the register mask is interpreted differently for different EAs. */ @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ print_indexed (int basereg, /* Returns number of bytes "eaten" by the operand, or return -1 if an invalid operand was found, or -2 if - an opcode tabe error was found. + an opcode table error was found. ADDR is the pc for this arg to be relative to. */ static int diff --git a/disas/ppc.c b/disas/ppc.c index 63e97cfe1d..02be878198 100644 --- a/disas/ppc.c +++ b/disas/ppc.c @@ -5226,7 +5226,7 @@ operand_value_powerpc (const struct powerpc_operand *operand, if ((operand->flags & PPC_OPERAND_SIGNED) != 0) { /* BITM is always some number of zeros followed by some - number of ones, followed by some numer of zeros. */ + number of ones, followed by some number of zeros. */ unsigned long top = operand->bitm; /* top & -top gives the rightmost 1 bit, so this fills in any trailing zeros. */