From patchwork Thu Nov 5 06:50:46 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Chen X-Patchwork-Id: 318550 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDCAC00A89 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 101022087D for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 06:52:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 101022087D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZ85-00042p-Uw for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:52:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZ6u-0003Up-ND; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:51:04 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaZ6p-0001ni-GL; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:51:04 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CRZ0g1cbLzLqlb; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:50:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.187.138] (10.174.187.138) by DGGEMS409-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.209) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:50:46 +0800 Message-ID: <5FA3A0C6.5040500@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:50:46 +0800 From: AlexChen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Huth , , Paolo Bonzini Subject: [PATCH V2] qtest: Fix bad printf format specifiers X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.138] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.191; envelope-from=alex.chen@huawei.com; helo=szxga05-in.huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/05 01:50:51 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: QEMU Trivial , QEMU Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We should use printf format specifier PRIu32 instead of "%d" for argument of type 'uint32_t'. Reported-by: Euler Robot Signed-off-by: Alex Chen Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth --- tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c index d20094d5a7..003ba24fac 100644 --- a/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c +++ b/tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data) if (kvm_supports_sve) { g_assert(vls != 0); max_vq = 64 - __builtin_clzll(vls); - sprintf(max_name, "sve%d", max_vq * 128); + sprintf(max_name, "sve%" PRIu32, max_vq * 128); /* Enabling a supported length is of course fine. */ assert_sve_vls(qts, "host", vls, "{ %s: true }", max_name); @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data) * unless all larger, supported vector lengths are also * disabled. */ - sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128); + sprintf(name, "sve%" PRIu32, vq * 128); error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name); assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: true, %s: false }", @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data) * we need at least one vector length enabled. */ vq = __builtin_ffsll(vls); - sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128); + sprintf(name, "sve%" PRIu32, vq * 128); error = g_strdup_printf("cannot disable %s", name); assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: false }", name); g_free(error); @@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ static void test_query_cpu_model_expansion_kvm(const void *data) } } if (vq <= SVE_MAX_VQ) { - sprintf(name, "sve%d", vq * 128); + sprintf(name, "sve%" PRIu32, vq * 128); error = g_strdup_printf("cannot enable %s", name); assert_error(qts, "host", error, "{ %s: true }", name); g_free(error);