Message ID | 20240213130341.1793-8-philmd@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | hw: Strengthen SysBus & QBus API | expand |
On 13.02.2024 16:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > We should not wire IRQs on unrealized device. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> > --- > hw/sh4/r2d.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/hw/sh4/r2d.c b/hw/sh4/r2d.c > index e9f316a6ce..c73e8f49b8 100644 > --- a/hw/sh4/r2d.c > +++ b/hw/sh4/r2d.c > @@ -285,9 +285,9 @@ static void r2d_init(MachineState *machine) > dinfo = drive_get(IF_IDE, 0, 0); > dev = qdev_new("mmio-ide"); > busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev); > - sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); > qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "shift", 1); > sysbus_realize_and_unref(busdev, &error_fatal); > + sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); > sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 0, 0x14001000); > sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 1, 0x1400080c); > mmio_ide_init_drives(dev, dinfo, NULL); Should we pick this up for stable-9.0 & -9.1 series? Thanks, /mjt
Am 22. Oktober 2024 14:53:31 UTC schrieb Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>: >On 13.02.2024 16:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> We should not wire IRQs on unrealized device. >> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> >> Reviewed-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> >> --- >> hw/sh4/r2d.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/sh4/r2d.c b/hw/sh4/r2d.c >> index e9f316a6ce..c73e8f49b8 100644 >> --- a/hw/sh4/r2d.c >> +++ b/hw/sh4/r2d.c >> @@ -285,9 +285,9 @@ static void r2d_init(MachineState *machine) >> dinfo = drive_get(IF_IDE, 0, 0); >> dev = qdev_new("mmio-ide"); >> busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev); >> - sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); >> qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "shift", 1); >> sysbus_realize_and_unref(busdev, &error_fatal); >> + sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); >> sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 0, 0x14001000); >> sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 1, 0x1400080c); >> mmio_ide_init_drives(dev, dinfo, NULL); > >Should we pick this up for stable-9.0 & -9.1 series? IMO yes, because it fixes a regression. Best regards, Bernhard > >Thanks, > >/mjt
diff --git a/hw/sh4/r2d.c b/hw/sh4/r2d.c index e9f316a6ce..c73e8f49b8 100644 --- a/hw/sh4/r2d.c +++ b/hw/sh4/r2d.c @@ -285,9 +285,9 @@ static void r2d_init(MachineState *machine) dinfo = drive_get(IF_IDE, 0, 0); dev = qdev_new("mmio-ide"); busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev); - sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "shift", 1); sysbus_realize_and_unref(busdev, &error_fatal); + sysbus_connect_irq(busdev, 0, irq[CF_IDE]); sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 0, 0x14001000); sysbus_mmio_map(busdev, 1, 0x1400080c); mmio_ide_init_drives(dev, dinfo, NULL);