diff mbox series

[PULL,01/33] hw/intc: clean-up error reporting for failed ITS cmd

Message ID 20211215104049.2030475-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit 229c57b1986484ea2cd1eb744e3492af7eee063e
Headers show
Series [PULL,01/33] hw/intc: clean-up error reporting for failed ITS cmd | expand

Commit Message

Peter Maydell Dec. 15, 2021, 10:40 a.m. UTC 
From: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

While trying to debug a GIC ITS failure I saw some guest errors that
had poor formatting as well as leaving me confused as to what failed.
As most of the checks aren't possible without a valid dte split that
check apart and then check the other conditions in steps. This avoids
us relying on undefined data.

I still get a failure with the current kvm-unit-tests but at least I
know (partially) why now:

  Exception return from AArch64 EL1 to AArch64 EL1 PC 0x40080588
  PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: inv/invall: dev2/eventid=20 now triggers an LPI
  ITS: MAPD devid=2 size = 0x8 itt=0x40430000 valid=0
  INT dev_id=2 event_id=20
  process_its_cmd: invalid command attributes: invalid dte: 0 for 2 (MEM_TX: 0)
  PASS: gicv3: its-trigger: mapd valid=false: no LPI after device unmap
  SUMMARY: 6 tests, 1 unexpected failures

Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20211112170454.3158925-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org
Cc: Shashi Mallela <shashi.mallela@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
index c929a9cb5c3..b99e63d58f7 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_its.c
@@ -274,21 +274,36 @@  static bool process_its_cmd(GICv3ITSState *s, uint64_t value, uint32_t offset,
         if (res != MEMTX_OK) {
             return result;
         }
+    } else {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                      "%s: invalid command attributes: "
+                      "invalid dte: %"PRIx64" for %d (MEM_TX: %d)\n",
+                      __func__, dte, devid, res);
+        return result;
     }
 
-    if ((devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) || !dte_valid || !ite_valid ||
-            !cte_valid || (eventid > max_eventid)) {
+
+    /*
+     * In this implementation, in case of guest errors we ignore the
+     * command and move onto the next command in the queue.
+     */
+    if (devid > s->dt.maxids.max_devids) {
         qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
-                      "%s: invalid command attributes "
-                      "devid %d or eventid %d or invalid dte %d or"
-                      "invalid cte %d or invalid ite %d\n",
-                      __func__, devid, eventid, dte_valid, cte_valid,
-                      ite_valid);
-        /*
-         * in this implementation, in case of error
-         * we ignore this command and move onto the next
-         * command in the queue
-         */
+                      "%s: invalid command attributes: devid %d>%d",
+                      __func__, devid, s->dt.maxids.max_devids);
+
+    } else if (!dte_valid || !ite_valid || !cte_valid) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                      "%s: invalid command attributes: "
+                      "dte: %s, ite: %s, cte: %s\n",
+                      __func__,
+                      dte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid",
+                      ite_valid ? "valid" : "invalid",
+                      cte_valid ? "valid" : "invalid");
+    } else if (eventid > max_eventid) {
+        qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+                      "%s: invalid command attributes: eventid %d > %d\n",
+                      __func__, eventid, max_eventid);
     } else {
         /*
          * Current implementation only supports rdbase == procnum