From patchwork Wed Oct 21 13:43:44 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Janosch Frank X-Patchwork-Id: 270789 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF6AC388F9 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3074F2065C for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="XxxEEg9v" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3074F2065C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:47616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEQc-00076J-Va for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:45:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEPL-0005qn-OJ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:44:03 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:17440 helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVEPJ-0006UN-2A; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:44:03 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09LDgR0E106775; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=dVliiDtCkD8myCUYPi1HxnZYvwqqMcc0mBlZeudvQUM=; b=XxxEEg9vWqFkwFva2xGTW93HrvXunPQJvRD35jiiwXZTjMm1C5WMuRxfwqav4HYdhH/F Hs6v7mnIVQ++LxREdE8hw5K2gFs37l022W6CdXdyhsMbjn8tSubrWVULlHxc+7Eh/4Tu 3oRFXb/W6Fb6LihlB0qzDIbW7sfbCLk0niInCFMyiqGZFu3MPH5NI1D1sYQPt0fYl0fm W8fY2GmL7BXEDG1iS/LvFuFfydot0YXlLJql109+83OWlKkwfP8prudJlPFyz6iNLfUg Ic1tVXMOAgsEwtncyHi2yh06afgD/yB1/W36iwH1LXEQFhjN4OprlbcsrmZGl16+drAI pw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34anv288kx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:57 -0400 Received: from m0098414.ppops.net (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 09LDhu7p110352; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:56 -0400 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 34anv288kd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:56 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 09LDcVY3007995; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:55 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 347r87t95b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:54 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 09LDhqN525035126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:52 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DA2A405B; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EBEA4057; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux01.pok.stglabs.ibm.com (unknown [9.114.17.81]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Janosch Frank To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] s390x: pv: Remove sclp boundary checks Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 09:43:44 -0400 Message-Id: <20201021134345.110173-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20201021134345.110173-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> References: <20201021134345.110173-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-10-21_06:2020-10-20, 2020-10-21 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010210103 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.158.5; envelope-from=frankja@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/21 09:43:58 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, walling@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, mhartmay@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" The SCLP boundary cross check is done by the Ultravisor for a protected guest, hence we don't need to do it. As QEMU doesn't get a valid SCCB address in protected mode this is even problematic and can lead to QEMU reporting a false boundary cross error. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer Fixes: db13387ca0 ("s390/sclp: rework sclp boundary checks") Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger Tested-by: Marc Hartmayer Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Halil Pasic Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth --- hw/s390x/sclp.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c index 00f1e4648d..0cf2290826 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c @@ -285,11 +285,6 @@ int sclp_service_call_protected(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t sccb, goto out_write; } - if (!sccb_verify_boundary(sccb, be16_to_cpu(work_sccb->h.length), code)) { - work_sccb->h.response_code = cpu_to_be16(SCLP_RC_SCCB_BOUNDARY_VIOLATION); - goto out_write; - } - sclp_c->execute(sclp, work_sccb, code); out_write: s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(env_archcpu(env), 0, work_sccb,