From patchwork Wed Sep 30 09:53:12 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lichang Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 304057 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069D0C4727E for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98A5A2075F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:00:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 98A5A2075F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54894 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYuR-0005Cc-Nn for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 06:00:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYoj-0007O8-8E; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:33 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5159 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNYoY-0004Oc-Mw; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:54:32 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CA9D41EB3A67B8241A96; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.174.185.186) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:54:12 +0800 From: zhaolichang To: Subject: [PATCH RFC 05/14] tricore/: fix some comment spelling errors Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:53:12 +0800 Message-ID: <20200930095321.2006-6-zhaolichang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> References: <20200930095321.2006-1-zhaolichang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.185.186] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.190; envelope-from=zhaolichang@huawei.com; helo=huawei.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/30 05:46:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: zhaolichang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/tricore. I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the folder. Signed-off-by: zhaolichang Reviewed-by: David Edmondson --- target/s390x/ioinst.c | 2 +- target/tricore/csfr.def | 2 +- target/tricore/translate.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c index a412926..c576d85 100644 --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, /* * As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions, * we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the - * access execption if it is not) first. + * access exception if it is not) first. */ if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib))) { s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, ra); diff --git a/target/tricore/csfr.def b/target/tricore/csfr.def index ff004cb..cdfaf1d 100644 --- a/target/tricore/csfr.def +++ b/target/tricore/csfr.def @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* A(ll) access permited +/* A(ll) access permitted R(ead only) access E(nd init protected) access diff --git a/target/tricore/translate.c b/target/tricore/translate.c index 7752630..c9c420d 100644 --- a/target/tricore/translate.c +++ b/target/tricore/translate.c @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void gen_mfcr(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, int32_t offset) #undef E #define R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) /* don't gen writes to read-only reg, - since no execption occurs */ + since no exception occurs */ #define A(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) \ case ADDRESS: \ if (has_feature(ctx, FEATURE)) { \