From patchwork Mon Jun 1 14:29:23 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 281550 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9012C433DF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E23206C3 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XTbutdDK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 97E23206C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=amsat.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jflTF-0004yz-Or for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:31:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jflRZ-0002KI-Gs; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:29:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x342.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::342]:40565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jflRY-0002aQ-T1; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:29:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x342.google.com with SMTP id r15so11562473wmh.5; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 07:29:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HzSo+FKM+7hllBEEZUwDzngvpJfgcJMgoiFq36o0B8U=; b=XTbutdDKkJKkajTBQBfb3gKAZ8HdQTRh7KPk2PRf4BKVCmPN/4PTUsFkxrz9l/MxyE WUpRpf229tNzjnPfHSCA8du3tlIB75OS5/RVT9l2X8Pi8CcwsUCX6HO+2vIyYWMLw2tC ebQhYTRJklmhotmYL2rx/GdLsCDfCBNHfnduxY4Q5bNFjSm8izV9JBOdMPkxXDwKlw4c 031Lz9blGnoP7VIxmgxsb+iWzGBmm5T0wI/Tv3aiTxDNGjcUF71CVDuNVRspxPMH9UPA 3nwu20FxG3BzD2wN0HUsD79p+AZtAAKT3qF+a+MxMkbmLHvKPtyLwMf0vUqt0hTFsvk2 JbNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HzSo+FKM+7hllBEEZUwDzngvpJfgcJMgoiFq36o0B8U=; b=a5FXPKeDPm9AAytvGoiuD+6E6p4MnKFCU7xmrXgYVawFG+gQHOzacWIAkArF1Kkxih EtCllpPA+kdG+XghnyFR9obZ3eh1rA3lOfTTrPJArCA2KUphzEnplGtA+SKLQ0fjNf54 EFA6s5FMRz2ZWHxmSFz99flG6WZs59C4nf+VmHQ0cTsT2GXGzYH5t0mSV6Yned7uHgRK PBlP2yNwvV+pNrf5Xm5qrmY4JnK1o8KjVEDFNwIIYBpF+orBG9Ghhw6g19GwtTjFMDrT JsLC52jr8KH69WalaLjTakmOa/Y+5qCMIV9NFmR1OVmK5eujS5k7wgkIb8Fw68913tsi +Hqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oZqmhJ2/Tebh3u4xvqsrf3OCqWhs2Y5RCPS6KTvqvpEBDZseL USE3IyEbBUBbFcdhvxJCLGrOd2rT X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBHE8bkJSVSp9Yf35551bkKIwhQ9ZWpujBeFh9r1gwWsJDZxkC3k++/FRQy/FR48XoWkpxlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c84b:: with SMTP id c11mr21338870wml.78.1591021774481; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 07:29:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (43.red-83-51-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.51.162.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u12sm6824954wrq.90.2020.06.01.07.29.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Jun 2020 07:29:33 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] hw/arm/aspeed: Correct DRAM container region size Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:29:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20200601142930.29408-2-f4bug@amsat.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.3 In-Reply-To: <20200601142930.29408-1-f4bug@amsat.org> References: <20200601142930.29408-1-f4bug@amsat.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::342; envelope-from=philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x342.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Stefano Stabellini , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Jeffery , Helge Deller , Paul Durrant , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?b?SGVydsOpIFBv?= =?utf-8?q?ussineau?= , Joel Stanley , Paolo Bonzini , Anthony Perard , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Richard Henderson , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?b?Q8OpZHJp?= =?utf-8?q?c_Le_Goater?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" memory_region_set_size() handle the 16 Exabytes limit by special-casing the UINT64_MAX value. This is not a problem for the 32-bit maximum, 4 GiB. By using the UINT32_MAX value, the aspeed-ram-container MemoryRegion ends up missing 1 byte: $ qemu-system-arm -M ast2600-evb -S -monitor stdio (qemu) info mtree address-space: aspeed.fmc-ast2600-dma-dram 0000000080000000-000000017ffffffe (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container 0000000080000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, ram): ram 00000000c0000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram Fix by using the correct value. We now have: address-space: aspeed.fmc-ast2600-dma-dram 0000000080000000-000000017fffffff (prio 0, i/o): aspeed-ram-container 0000000080000000-00000000bfffffff (prio 0, ram): ram 00000000c0000000-ffffffffffffffff (prio 0, i/o): max_ram Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- hw/arm/aspeed.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c index 2c23297edf..62344ac6a3 100644 --- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static void aspeed_machine_init(MachineState *machine) bmc = g_new0(AspeedBoardState, 1); memory_region_init(&bmc->ram_container, NULL, "aspeed-ram-container", - UINT32_MAX); + 4 * GiB); memory_region_add_subregion(&bmc->ram_container, 0, machine->ram); object_initialize_child(OBJECT(machine), "soc", &bmc->soc,