From patchwork Fri May 29 10:35:54 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 281686 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41248C433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C0D22065C for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="JJgSKzWP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0C0D22065C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33484 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jecR8-0005HP-6f for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:40:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jecN7-0007BS-1W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:36:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:36869 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jecN2-0004xK-Ne for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:36:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590748570; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JU4N+xCmEl4LFT3IKsV7DZx5wVwce7+UUJUf0SQebJQ=; b=JJgSKzWPlRZexdHfJ2VSe06P1a7+88onJbO1BXDVkT8M3EtLjr3AitdPfL3+COohGJGnNG iu2SyiqprJ3W1TDuRu4GX3VPcNnaUcn/PHtxO8Yeygp2+FpGetIYXaOqNIRDiaKw0rTxqH iM5VlxnWFOylOLAyAI4eAs9rXMVmQcM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-79-tuRa-3SzM3eTKi9I9iUzUg-1; Fri, 29 May 2020 06:36:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tuRa-3SzM3eTKi9I9iUzUg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9252A872FE0; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:36:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [10.36.110.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843991A7C8; Fri, 29 May 2020 10:36:04 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 4/5] test-crypto-secret: add 'secret_keyring' object tests. Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:35:54 +0100 Message-Id: <20200529103555.2759928-5-berrange@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200529103555.2759928-1-berrange@redhat.com> References: <20200529103555.2759928-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/29 01:27:49 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexey Krasikov , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_?= =?utf-8?b?QmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Alexey Krasikov Add tests: test_secret_keyring_good; test_secret_keyring_revoked_key; test_secret_keyring_expired_key; test_secret_keyring_bad_serial_key; test_secret_keyring_bad_key_access_right; Added tests require libkeyutils. The absence of this library is not critical, because these tests will be skipped in this case. Signed-off-by: Alexey Krasikov Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé --- configure | 24 ++++++ tests/Makefile.include | 4 + tests/test-crypto-secret.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 186 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure b/configure index d95ff4e0b3..f2ff722f7e 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -6305,6 +6305,27 @@ but not implemented on your system" fi fi +########################################## +# check for usable keyutils.h + +if test "$linux" = "yes" ; then + + have_keyutils=no + cat > $TMPC << EOF +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +int main(void) { + return request_key("user", NULL, NULL, 0); +} +EOF + if compile_prog "" "-lkeyutils"; then + have_keyutils=yes + fi +fi + ########################################## # End of CC checks @@ -7674,6 +7695,9 @@ fi if test "$secret_keyring" = "yes" ; then echo "CONFIG_SECRET_KEYRING=y" >> $config_host_mak + if test "$have_keyutils" = "yes" ; then + echo "CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING=y" >> $config_host_mak + fi fi if test "$tcg_interpreter" = "yes"; then diff --git a/tests/Makefile.include b/tests/Makefile.include index 03a74b60f6..de13908701 100644 --- a/tests/Makefile.include +++ b/tests/Makefile.include @@ -538,6 +538,10 @@ tests/benchmark-crypto-cipher$(EXESUF): tests/benchmark-crypto-cipher.o $(test-c tests/test-crypto-secret$(EXESUF): tests/test-crypto-secret.o $(test-crypto-obj-y) tests/test-crypto-xts$(EXESUF): tests/test-crypto-xts.o $(test-crypto-obj-y) +ifeq ($(CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING),y) +tests/test-crypto-secret.o-libs := -lkeyutils +endif + tests/crypto-tls-x509-helpers.o-cflags := $(TASN1_CFLAGS) tests/crypto-tls-x509-helpers.o-libs := $(TASN1_LIBS) tests/pkix_asn1_tab.o-cflags := $(TASN1_CFLAGS) diff --git a/tests/test-crypto-secret.c b/tests/test-crypto-secret.c index 13fc6c4c75..603a093f10 100644 --- a/tests/test-crypto-secret.c +++ b/tests/test-crypto-secret.c @@ -24,6 +24,10 @@ #include "crypto/secret.h" #include "qapi/error.h" #include "qemu/module.h" +#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING +#include "crypto/secret_keyring.h" +#include +#endif static void test_secret_direct(void) { @@ -124,6 +128,147 @@ static void test_secret_indirect_emptyfile(void) g_free(fname); } +#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING + +#define DESCRIPTION "qemu_test_secret" +#define PAYLOAD "Test Payload" + + +static void test_secret_keyring_good(void) +{ + char key_str[16]; + Object *sec; + int32_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD, + strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); + + g_assert(key >= 0); + + snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key); + sec = object_new_with_props( + TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_KEYRING, + object_get_objects_root(), + "sec0", + &error_abort, + "serial", key_str, + NULL); + + assert(0 <= keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING)); + char *pw = qcrypto_secret_lookup_as_utf8("sec0", + &error_abort); + g_assert_cmpstr(pw, ==, PAYLOAD); + + object_unparent(sec); + g_free(pw); +} + + +static void test_secret_keyring_revoked_key(void) +{ + char key_str[16]; + Object *sec; + int32_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD, + strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); + g_assert(key >= 0); + g_assert_false(keyctl_revoke(key)); + + snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key); + sec = object_new_with_props( + TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_KEYRING, + object_get_objects_root(), + "sec0", + NULL, + "serial", key_str, + NULL); + + g_assert(errno == EKEYREVOKED); + g_assert(sec == NULL); + + keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); +} + + +static void test_secret_keyring_expired_key(void) +{ + char key_str[16]; + Object *sec; + int32_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD, + strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); + g_assert(key >= 0); + g_assert_false(keyctl_set_timeout(key, 1)); + sleep(1); + + snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key); + sec = object_new_with_props( + TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_KEYRING, + object_get_objects_root(), + "sec0", + NULL, + "serial", key_str, + NULL); + + g_assert(errno == EKEYEXPIRED); + g_assert(sec == NULL); + + keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); +} + + +static void test_secret_keyring_bad_serial_key(void) +{ + Object *sec; + + sec = object_new_with_props( + TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_KEYRING, + object_get_objects_root(), + "sec0", + NULL, + "serial", "1", + NULL); + + g_assert(errno == ENOKEY); + g_assert(sec == NULL); +} + +/* + * TODO + * test_secret_keyring_bad_key_access_right() is not working yet. + * We don't know yet if this due a bug in the Linux kernel or + * whether it's normal syscall behavior. + * We've requested information from kernel maintainers. + * See: + * Thread: 'security/keys: remove possessor verify after key permission check' + */ + +static void test_secret_keyring_bad_key_access_right(void) +{ + char key_str[16]; + Object *sec; + + g_test_skip("TODO: Need responce from Linux kernel maintainers"); + return; + + int32_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD, + strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); + g_assert(key >= 0); + g_assert_false(keyctl_setperm(key, KEY_POS_ALL & (~KEY_POS_READ))); + + snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key); + + sec = object_new_with_props( + TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_KEYRING, + object_get_objects_root(), + "sec0", + NULL, + "serial", key_str, + NULL); + + g_assert(errno == EACCES); + g_assert(sec == NULL); + + keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING); +} + +#endif /* CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING */ static void test_secret_noconv_base64_good(void) { @@ -426,6 +571,19 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/indirect/emptyfile", test_secret_indirect_emptyfile); +#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/keyring/good", + test_secret_keyring_good); + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/keyring/revoked_key", + test_secret_keyring_revoked_key); + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/keyring/expired_key", + test_secret_keyring_expired_key); + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/keyring/bad_serial_key", + test_secret_keyring_bad_serial_key); + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/keyring/bad_key_access_right", + test_secret_keyring_bad_key_access_right); +#endif /* CONFIG_TEST_SECRET_KEYRING */ + g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/noconv/base64/good", test_secret_noconv_base64_good); g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/noconv/base64/bad",