@@ -432,6 +432,15 @@ static DisasCond cond_make_f(void)
};
}
+static DisasCond cond_make_t(void)
+{
+ return (DisasCond){
+ .c = TCG_COND_ALWAYS,
+ .a0 = NULL,
+ .a1 = NULL,
+ };
+}
+
static DisasCond cond_make_n(void)
{
return (DisasCond){
@@ -930,17 +939,50 @@ static DisasCond do_sub_cond(unsigned cf, TCGv_reg res,
return cond;
}
-/* Similar, but for logicals, where the carry and overflow bits are not
- computed, and use of them is undefined. */
+/*
+ * Similar, but for logicals, where the carry and overflow bits are not
+ * computed, and use of them is undefined.
+ *
+ * Undefined or not, hardware does not trap. It seems reasonable to
+ * assume hardware treats cases c={4,5,6} as if C=0 & V=0, since that's
+ * how cases c={2,3} are treated.
+ */
static DisasCond do_log_cond(unsigned cf, TCGv_reg res)
{
- switch (cf >> 1) {
- case 4: case 5: case 6:
- cf &= 1;
- break;
+ switch (cf) {
+ case 0: /* never */
+ case 9: /* undef, C */
+ case 11: /* undef, C & !Z */
+ case 12: /* undef, V */
+ return cond_make_f();
+
+ case 1: /* true */
+ case 8: /* undef, !C */
+ case 10: /* undef, !C | Z */
+ case 13: /* undef, !V */
+ return cond_make_t();
+
+ case 2: /* == */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_EQ, res);
+ case 3: /* <> */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_NE, res);
+ case 4: /* < */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_LT, res);
+ case 5: /* >= */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_GE, res);
+ case 6: /* <= */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_LE, res);
+ case 7: /* > */
+ return cond_make_0(TCG_COND_GT, res);
+
+ case 14: /* OD */
+ case 15: /* EV */
+ return do_cond(cf, res, NULL, NULL);
+
+ default:
+ g_assert_not_reached();
}
- return do_cond(cf, res, res, res);
}
/* Similar, but for shift/extract/deposit conditions. */
We will be fixing do_cond vs signed overflow, which requires that do_log_cond not rely on do_cond. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- target/hppa/translate.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.17.2