mbox series

[v5,0/4] target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters

Message ID 20181113180154.17903-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org
Headers show
Series target/arm: KVM vs ARMISARegisters | expand

Message

Richard Henderson Nov. 13, 2018, 6:01 p.m. UTC 
Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,
so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.

r~


Richard Henderson (4):
  target/arm: Install ARMISARegisters from kvm host
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm64
  target/arm: Introduce read_sys_reg32 for kvm32
  target/arm: Fill in ARMISARegisters for kvm32

 target/arm/kvm_arm.h |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm.c     |  1 +
 target/arm/kvm32.c   | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 target/arm/kvm64.c   | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.2

Comments

Peter Maydell Nov. 15, 2018, 2:53 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 13 November 2018 at 18:01, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
> Facepalm.  I managed to not push the v3 changes anywhere,

> so the v4 changes were done on top of v2.  Ho hum.

>

> r~

>


Applied v5 to target-arm.next for 3.1, thanks. (And tested on
both the aarch64 and the aarch32 systems that had problems
with earlier versions of the patchset.)

-- PMM