| Message ID | 20210414091832.5132-3-lingshan.zhu@intel.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | vDPA/ifcvf: enables Intel C5000X-PL virtio-blk | expand |
在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道: > This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block > for vDPA. > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> > --- > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++- > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h > index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644 > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > #include <linux/pci_regs.h> > #include <linux/vdpa.h> > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h> > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h> > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h> > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> > > @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@ > #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 > #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001 > > -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ > +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4 > +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001 > +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 > +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002 > + > +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ > ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \ > (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \ > (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ > @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ > (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \ > (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) > > +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ > + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() implemention? E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? Thanks > + > /* Only one queue pair for now. */ > #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1 > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644 > --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c > @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) > struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); > u64 features; > > - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; > + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET) > + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; > + > + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) > + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; > > return features; > } > @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = { > C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID, > C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, > C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, > + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID, > + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID, > + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, > + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, > > { 0 }, > };
On 4/15/2021 11:34 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > > 在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >> This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block >> for vDPA. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >> index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ >> #include <linux/pci_regs.h> >> #include <linux/vdpa.h> >> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h> >> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h> >> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h> >> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> >> @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@ >> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001 >> -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4 >> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001 >> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002 >> + >> +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >> ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \ >> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \ >> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >> @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ >> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \ >> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) >> +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >> + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) > > > I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the > reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() > implemention? > > E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? > > Thanks The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq implementation is not ready in the driver. Thanks! > > >> + >> /* Only one queue pair for now. */ >> #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1 >> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >> index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >> @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct >> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) >> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); >> u64 features; >> - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET) >> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >> IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >> + >> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) >> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >> IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >> return features; >> } >> @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = { >> C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID, >> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID, >> + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID, >> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >> { 0 }, >> }; >
在 2021/4/15 下午1:55, Zhu Lingshan 写道: > > > On 4/15/2021 11:34 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> 在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >>> This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block >>> for vDPA. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++- >>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>> index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ >>> #include <linux/pci_regs.h> >>> #include <linux/vdpa.h> >>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h> >>> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h> >>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h> >>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> >>> @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@ >>> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >>> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001 >>> -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4 >>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001 >>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002 >>> + >>> +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>> ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \ >>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \ >>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >>> @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ >>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \ >>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) >>> +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>> + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) >> >> >> I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the >> reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() >> implemention? >> >> E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or >> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? >> >> Thanks > The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not > supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq implementation > is not ready in the driver. I understand the case of virtio-net but I wonder why we need this for block where we don't vq cvq. Thanks > > Thanks! > >> >> >>> + >>> /* Only one queue pair for now. */ >>> #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1 >>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>> index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>> @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct >>> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) >>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); >>> u64 features; >>> - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET) >>> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >>> IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>> + >>> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) >>> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >>> IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>> return features; >>> } >>> @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = { >>> C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID, >>> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >>> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >>> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID, >>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID, >>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >>> { 0 }, >>> }; >> >
On 4/15/2021 2:31 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > 在 2021/4/15 下午1:55, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >> >> >> On 4/15/2021 11:34 AM, Jason Wang wrote: >>> >>> 在 2021/4/14 下午5:18, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >>>> This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block >>>> for vDPA. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- >>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++- >>>> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>>> index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h >>>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ >>>> #include <linux/pci_regs.h> >>>> #include <linux/vdpa.h> >>>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h> >>>> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h> >>>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h> >>>> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> >>>> @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@ >>>> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >>>> #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001 >>>> -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4 >>>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001 >>>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 >>>> +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002 >>>> + >>>> +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>>> ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \ >>>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \ >>>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >>>> @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ >>>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \ >>>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) >>>> +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ >>>> + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ >>>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) >>> >>> >>> I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the >>> reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() >>> implemention? >>> >>> E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or >>> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? >>> >>> Thanks >> The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not >> supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq implementation >> is not ready in the driver. > > > I understand the case of virtio-net but I wonder why we need this for > block where we don't vq cvq. > > Thanks This is still a subset of the feature bits read from hardware, I leave it here to code consistently, and indicate what we support clearly. Are you suggesting remove this feature bits list and just use what we read from hardware? Thansk > > >> >> Thanks! >> >>> >>> >>>> + >>>> /* Only one queue pair for now. */ >>>> #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1 >>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c >>>> @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct >>>> vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) >>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); >>>> u64 features; >>>> - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>>> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET) >>>> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >>>> IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>>> + >>>> + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) >>>> + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & >>>> IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; >>>> return features; >>>> } >>>> @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = { >>>> C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID, >>>> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >>>> C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >>>> + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID, >>>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID, >>>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, >>>> + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, >>>> { 0 }, >>>> }; >>> >> >
在 2021/4/15 下午2:41, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >>>> >>>> I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the >>>> reason for such whitelist consider there's already a get_features() >>>> implemention? >>>> >>>> E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or >>>> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not >>> supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq implementation >>> is not ready in the driver. >> >> >> I understand the case of virtio-net but I wonder why we need this for >> block where we don't vq cvq. >> >> Thanks > This is still a subset of the feature bits read from hardware, I leave > it here to code consistently, and indicate what we support clearly. > Are you suggesting remove this feature bits list and just use what we > read from hardware? > > Thansk Yes, please do that. The whiltelist doesn't help in this case I think. Thanks
On 4/15/2021 3:17 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > 在 2021/4/15 下午2:41, Zhu Lingshan 写道: >>>>> >>>>> I think we've discussed this sometime in the past but what's the >>>>> reason for such whitelist consider there's already a >>>>> get_features() implemention? >>>>> >>>>> E.g Any reason to block VIRTIO_BLK_F_WRITE_ZEROS or >>>>> VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>> The reason is some feature bits are supported in the device but not >>>> supported by the driver, e.g, for virtio-net, mq & cq >>>> implementation is not ready in the driver. >>> >>> >>> I understand the case of virtio-net but I wonder why we need this >>> for block where we don't vq cvq. >>> >>> Thanks >> This is still a subset of the feature bits read from hardware, I >> leave it here to code consistently, and indicate what we support >> clearly. >> Are you suggesting remove this feature bits list and just use what we >> read from hardware? >> >> Thansk > > > Yes, please do that. > > The whiltelist doesn't help in this case I think. OK, will remove this in V2 Thanks > > Thanks
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h index 1c04cd256fa7..8b403522bf06 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include <linux/pci_regs.h> #include <linux/vdpa.h> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h> +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h> #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h> @@ -28,7 +29,12 @@ #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 #define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0001 -#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID 0x1AF4 +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID 0x1001 +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID 0x8086 +#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID 0x0002 + +#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC) | \ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | \ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ @@ -37,6 +43,15 @@ (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM) | \ (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF)) +#define IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \ + ((1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) | \ + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM)) + /* Only one queue pair for now. */ #define IFCVF_MAX_QUEUE_PAIRS 1 diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c index 99b0a6b4c227..9b6a38b798fa 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c @@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev) struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); u64 features; - features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET) + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; + + if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK) + features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_BLK_SUPPORTED_FEATURES; return features; } @@ -509,6 +513,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = { C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID, C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, + { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID, + C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID, + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID, + C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) }, { 0 }, };
This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block for vDPA. Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> --- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++- 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)