From patchwork Thu Jan 21 12:15:57 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Steffen Klassert X-Patchwork-Id: 368492 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38389C433E6 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF7A2399A for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729780AbhAUMUb (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:20:31 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:54640 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730855AbhAUMQu (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:16:50 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095C42049A; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qe0rztY3DOcE; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CEC204B4; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:02 +0100 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2044.4; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:02 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B44CC3180757; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:16:01 +0100 (CET) From: Steffen Klassert To: David Miller , Jakub Kicinski CC: Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , Subject: [PATCH 4/5] selftests: xfrm: fix test return value override issue in xfrm_policy.sh Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 13:15:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20210121121558.621339-5-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210121121558.621339-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> References: <20210121121558.621339-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Po-Hsu Lin When running this xfrm_policy.sh test script, even with some cases marked as FAIL, the overall test result will still be PASS: $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh PASS: policy before exception matches FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions) PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions) PASS: policy matches (exceptions) FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies) PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies) PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies) FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes) FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change in ns3) FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to normal) PASS: policies with repeated htresh change $ echo $? 0 This is because the $lret in check_xfrm() is not a local variable. Therefore when a test failed in check_exceptions(), the non-zero $lret will later get reset to 0 when the next test calls check_xfrm(). With this fix, the final return value will be 1. Make it easier for testers to spot this failure. Fixes: 39aa6928d462d0 ("xfrm: policy: fix netlink/pf_key policy lookups") Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin Acked-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh index 7a1bf94c5bd3..5922941e70c6 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ check_xfrm() { # 1: iptables -m policy rule count != 0 rval=$1 ip=$2 - lret=0 + local lret=0 ip netns exec ns1 ping -q -c 1 10.0.2.$ip > /dev/null