From patchwork Fri May 29 11:04:03 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Steffen Klassert X-Patchwork-Id: 218211 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9846C433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D191206E2 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726644AbgE2LKp (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 07:10:45 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:39908 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726167AbgE2LKo (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 07:10:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E5A205E5; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:10:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UEP4zPNxmfYp; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:10:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66DE205CD; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:10:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:10:41 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:10:40 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3747A31806E8; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:04:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Steffen Klassert To: David Miller CC: Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , Subject: [PATCH 10/15] ip_vti: receive ipip packet by calling ip_tunnel_rcv Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:04:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20200529110408.6349-11-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200529110408.6349-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> References: <20200529110408.6349-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Xin Long In Commit dd9ee3444014 ("vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel"), it tries to receive IPIP packets in vti by calling xfrm_input(). This case happens when a small packet or frag sent by peer is too small to get compressed. However, xfrm_input() will still get to the IPCOMP path where skb sec_path is set, but never dropped while it should have been done in vti_ipcomp4_protocol.cb_handler(vti_rcv_cb), as it's not an ipcomp4 packet. This will cause that the packet can never pass xfrm4_policy_check() in the upper protocol rcv functions. So this patch is to call ip_tunnel_rcv() to process IPIP packets instead. Fixes: dd9ee3444014 ("vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel") Reported-by: Xiumei Mu Signed-off-by: Xin Long Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert --- net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index 1b4e6f298648..1dda7c155c48 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -93,7 +93,28 @@ static int vti_rcv_proto(struct sk_buff *skb) static int vti_rcv_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb) { - return vti_rcv(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, true); + struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(dev_net(skb->dev), vti_net_id); + const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb); + struct ip_tunnel *tunnel; + + tunnel = ip_tunnel_lookup(itn, skb->dev->ifindex, TUNNEL_NO_KEY, + iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0); + if (tunnel) { + struct tnl_ptk_info tpi = { + .proto = htons(ETH_P_IP), + }; + + if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) + goto drop; + if (iptunnel_pull_header(skb, 0, tpi.proto, false)) + goto drop; + return ip_tunnel_rcv(tunnel, skb, &tpi, NULL, false); + } + + return -EINVAL; +drop: + kfree_skb(skb); + return 0; } static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err)