Message ID | 20210407153604.1680079-1-vladbu@nvidia.com |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CB6C433B4 for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D936113A for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1343796AbhDGPgu (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:36:50 -0400 Received: from mail-bn8nam12on2067.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.237.67]:25537 "EHLO NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233984AbhDGPgr (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 11:36:47 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=H2MyOYgaTuOYUE9frzIcLbmEWBB6jfYP5dBzypHVJGhpjETHj9itq0A68GLBf6kIuzPb8AJujVJEh91zmCIdB4UpR8EdSu0NYVBa77LNqxnjbX87YdWN18wmwn9k/O2GzAPU5Kk+JPt+jsrFR9QkKXSQrH5RllDJAYXGHlHBG5lHYrH/ofTOfRW7TcAVl7p5NxIwC280EwE8KZZPRm/bPlViqWxrWkXYsxfK7PGrjWRk4hOEJ0B/0GlhYzjYc2kJ8to2koi89Z0vuz9j3YW6ozXibRFa5W7PaYOXsf45uyDZS1CvEgRF4hgTkJHNKQI/Te8tvkXbVi5hTB/LSwYkiQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xGNvQSk03x01IyuQGBIlujmIBHELUpP0ZJQfqnokdSg=; b=Z1qxnNJb1hDo25lREuXAHYi5PmqekHtKOydsrhUEetp/cCEqtIvLoibw9oGX4v9WXD3syTrz4VZ9bnskPZjQw+vYnGfmVuL4BYz5R3OsNEl2hnxAerNMjCvXrLDulXABN4d8ZR5f1eQUHym3zLcInkROT/j6rjrdsB4xQkRoE0BaP/qXVsKE4xchgKgPrY08mQbnbobOItWcIIcKseZVMkYa3LJXityPA9X6mx2oh2u8AUTIbbFnT318/1AchyqhCXS2oblk1zbamRUzbXqOYfbNuo32HV1aZG5B0vB65+QPu026Ny3cPpeqa1aJuGUx/UML61UhA1tlwuI21dAB8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.112.35) smtp.rcpttodomain=kernel.org smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xGNvQSk03x01IyuQGBIlujmIBHELUpP0ZJQfqnokdSg=; b=Ik8hugqOfGHI7l84byuKA4/W+HdDiS3Iu+3cfK7u/LBuIcBDvAQDXkKSlBczlNqsOboC8wXc3WZKTzI1wWUqMS2rn8IBOm7D6nPJqzkSMupR0IdBC31LxCgxlM36l/sNtRNd93r9w3LBz65ad9BD36OTUjVHCJmTy1gUm+6E2Jf5KDNhGgFSUnveHQsqZss/CNybxz5oz6p6xNjcvHVVpsh2sRa/TPVe9O6uZuvHAGDfjuwex5awExTNt4fuO4mUX1r7YK/I58Ip+Ss3PVhGZBlvIoJpLK3EETqipbvGoYJJZHgixM/dj2t10kGwkNeMpqQ7iCAak8b2uCy6+mR93Q== Received: from DM6PR04CA0001.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:334::6) by DM4PR12MB5086.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:389::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.18; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:35 +0000 Received: from DM6NAM11FT010.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:334:cafe::7e) by DM6PR04CA0001.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:5:334::6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.16 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:35 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.112.35) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; kernel.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; kernel.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.112.35 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.112.35; helo=mail.nvidia.com; Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.112.35) by DM6NAM11FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.4020.17 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:34 +0000 Received: from HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) by HQMAIL111.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:34 +0000 Received: from vdi.nvidia.com (172.20.145.6) by mail.nvidia.com (172.20.187.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 15:36:31 +0000 From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org> CC: <memxor@gmail.com>, <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <jhs@mojatatu.com>, <jiri@resnulli.us>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <toke@redhat.com>, <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>, <dcaratti@redhat.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Subject: [PATCH net v2 0/3] Action initalization fixes Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 18:36:01 +0300 Message-ID: <20210407153604.1680079-1-vladbu@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: db1f28a3-1adb-42b4-5770-08d8f9daed26 X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DM4PR12MB5086: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DM4PR12MB508678810CA95E397514CC8BA0759@DM4PR12MB5086.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:5797; X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.112.35; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:mail.nvidia.com; PTR:schybrid02.nvidia.com; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(46966006)(36840700001)(478600001)(6666004)(8936002)(26005)(82740400003)(47076005)(107886003)(70586007)(70206006)(7416002)(7696005)(54906003)(5660300002)(83380400001)(8676002)(1076003)(2906002)(82310400003)(7636003)(356005)(36756003)(36906005)(336012)(36860700001)(2616005)(426003)(6916009)(316002)(4744005)(86362001)(4326008)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2021 15:36:34.8765 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: db1f28a3-1adb-42b4-5770-08d8f9daed26 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a; Ip=[216.228.112.35]; Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM11FT010.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM4PR12MB5086 Precedence: bulk List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org |
Series | Action initalization fixes | expand |
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 8:36 AM Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> wrote: > > This series fixes reference counting of action instances and modules in > several parts of action init code. The first patch reverts previous fix > that didn't properly account for rollback from a failure in the middle of > the loop in tcf_action_init() which is properly fixed by the following > patch. I still hate the init_res[] array, but I have no easy and better way to fix it either, so: Acked-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com> For the long term, we probably want to split the action ->init() into two: ->init() and ->change(), like TC filters, which hopefully could ease the complexity of tcf_action_init_1(). Thanks.