Message ID | 20210222151247.24534-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add support for skb with sk ref cloning | expand |
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 16:12 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > This code is trying to clone the skb with optional skb->sk. But this > will fail to clone the skb if socket was closed just after the skb was > pushed into the networking stack. Which IMHO is completely fine. If we then still clone the SKB we can't do anything with it, since the point would be to ... send it back to the socket, but it's gone. Nothing to fix here, I'd think. If you wanted to get a copy back that gives you the status of the SKB, it should not come as a huge surprise that you have to keep the socket open for that :) Having the ACK skb will just make us do more work by handing it back to skb_complete_wifi_ack() at TX status time, which is supposed to put it into the socket's error queue, but if the socket is closed ... no point in that. johannes
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 19:51 +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 22.02.2021 17:30:59, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 16:12 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > This code is trying to clone the skb with optional skb->sk. But this > > > will fail to clone the skb if socket was closed just after the skb was > > > pushed into the networking stack. > > > > Which IMHO is completely fine. If we then still clone the SKB we can't > > do anything with it, since the point would be to ... send it back to the > > socket, but it's gone. > > Ok, but why is the skb cloned if there is no socket linked in skb->sk? Hm? There are two different ways to get here, one with and one without a socket. johannes