From patchwork Wed Jul 22 14:40:15 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Murali Karicheri X-Patchwork-Id: 247013 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 2002:a92:d244:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v4csp595047ilg; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:40:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwekMrKXQFA3EinOh8dNmIKsoIXUp9w1PqaCDlRTPyHI1JsOYnxVJ0jqcxRlNT4HDEL3UFx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3a17:: with SMTP id z23mr29298763eje.238.1595428835364; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:40:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595428835; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ozw/XLefo7vfrzHi0GQ9EhUJ1ESiRjTgVTH6/jC5Ly0FdBaAKHMgSH81EHmeN+GeUK /0w2FNKAIvOFGJ4k5BSlx8XIV4/nqm7JIzXlRC5nsH4aS/R9ry64fdns++lKhUZfAHWv ymMfuVhQDDaHzkVql/1/EeMRGXE1oOjZkmlvoIx7XqIv2zkLKmlvufYaG4xC+A0efsTH Nk2hm0FnJOTz/dLYY9B3nnzTDXeA6WojpMisS6D66S6E0HvtRENtrez7XW5LVHkUn06Z kiCLp+W0DKIs17jTHp+GU2dDM0Q2Iv1FuJusQFZ9LbObcIXl4xjQmtsLLt2PqoUjqJ0f yo0w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=gJrgN3lyZmhT+pdBsxLwYZzltjbBdGF0lJmSM0xl2G4=; b=YMgRl3bpdKfoRQlAn4okdgZQcU4RHfHw54irN9ceIhMidoO7CUcArBs6SXUzqU0Rp4 m7ersn37E2/59+8JCr94sjb1VDrssXcZkYkpe5YcW8v9jMBFErW0/DJp6PAQmZA7gkPr Hm/txTIFHFKI50iwyK5nrpUSA6I2NPJA5MImIRTpzCrB4UzfM3DMoKUK5gAfbg2EV9P+ tNMUHY/K3gpQSI1DF07X+lIcOmDMClm0c6NPIFwpcJNgyTtjzlUH03u58LE5X1KpeJTb CideOSF40JQU5M9B+MHhMVJoHAdLMbInmdbuIShSLPUvkp+j4v3o0dBRJuNvUiZrvJFn tlzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=mXFZdOvi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t25si96899ejy.380.2020.07.22.07.40.35; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=mXFZdOvi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732677AbgGVOkb (ORCPT + 9 others); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:40:31 -0400 Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.248]:37154 "EHLO lelv0143.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732644AbgGVOk3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:40:29 -0400 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06MEeNdk127226; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1595428823; bh=gJrgN3lyZmhT+pdBsxLwYZzltjbBdGF0lJmSM0xl2G4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=mXFZdOvinJ57peKCfDcajxfntNGFZMt0tWxJVBqUBxaO/eCoQA/IXl26Cp1He+ZHs I36a+EmBCtV+CDaSsZ9KPApBmjuhjf13QRiUJrjeJjMXSqz5wI2te6SXwd4HuPDuPT KJq8Q10HpwoSrS7SnhB+xKdL9RvPZu0tM8qCR6nA= Received: from DFLE109.ent.ti.com (dfle109.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.30]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06MEeNbh067180 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:23 -0500 Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) by DFLE109.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:22 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:22 -0500 Received: from uda0868495.fios-router.home (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06MEeML8043940; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 09:40:22 -0500 From: Murali Karicheri To: , , , , , , , Subject: [net-next v5 PATCH 0/7] Add PRP driver Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:40:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20200722144022.15746-1-m-karicheri2@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hello, This series is dependent on the following patches sent out to netdev list. All (1-3) are already merged to net/master as of sending this, but not on the net-next master branch. So need to apply them to net-next before applying this series. v3 of the iproute2 patches can be merged to work with this series as there are no updates since then. [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=159526378131542&w=2 [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=159499772225350&w=2 [3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=159499772425352&w=2 This series adds support for Parallel Redundancy Protocol (PRP) in the Linux HSR driver as defined in IEC-62439-3. PRP Uses a Redundancy Control Trailer (RCT) the format of which is similar to HSR Tag. This is used for implementing redundancy. RCT consists of 6 bytes similar to HSR tag and contain following fields:- - 16-bit sequence number (SeqNr); - 4-bit LAN identifier (LanId); - 12 bit frame size (LSDUsize); - 16-bit suffix (PRPsuffix). The PRPsuffix identifies PRP frames and distinguishes PRP frames from other protocols that also append a trailer to their useful data. The LSDUsize field allows the receiver to distinguish PRP frames from random, nonredundant frames as an additional check. LSDUsize is the size of the Ethernet payload inclusive of the RCT. Sequence number along with LanId is used for duplicate detection and discard. PRP node is also known as Dual Attached Node (DAN-P) since it is typically attached to two different LAN for redundancy. DAN-P duplicates each of L2 frames and send it over the two Ethernet links. Each outgoing frame is appended with RCT. Unlike HSR, these are added to the end of L2 frame and will be treated as pad by bridges and therefore would be work with traditional bridges or switches, where as HSR wouldn't as Tag is prefixed to the Ethenet frame. At the remote end, these are received and the duplicate frame is discarded before the stripped frame is send up the networking stack. Like HSR, PRP also sends periodic Supervision frames to the network. These frames are received and MAC address from the SV frames are populated in a database called Node Table. The above functions are grouped into a block called Link Redundancy Entity (LRE) in the IEC spec. As there are many similarities between HSR and PRP protocols, this patch re-uses the code from HSR driver to implement PRP driver. As per feedback from the RFC series, the implementation uses the existing HSR Netlink socket interface to create the PRP interface by adding a new proto parameter to the ip link command to identify the PRP protocol. iproute2 is enhanced to implement this new parameter. The hsr_netlink.c is enhanced to handle the new proto parameter. As suggested during the RFC review, the driver introduced a proto_ops structure to hold protocol specfic functions to handle HSR and PRP specific function pointers and use them in the code based on the protocol to handle protocol specific part differently in the driver. Please review this and provide me feedback so that I can work to incorporate them and spin the next version if needed. The patch was tested using two TI AM57x IDK boards for PRP which are connected back to back over two CPSW Ethernet ports. PRP Test setup --------------- --------eth0 eth0 -------- |AM572x|----------------------|AM572x| | |----------------------| | --------eth1 eth1 -------- To build, enable CONFIG_HSR=y or m make omap2plus_defconfig make zImage; make modules; make dtbs Copy the zImage and dtb files to the file system on SD card and power on the AM572x boards. This can be tested on any platforms with 2 Ethernet interfaces. So will appreciate if you can give it a try and provide your Tested-by. Command to create PRP interface ------------------------------- ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth0 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth1 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth0 up ifconfig eth1 up ip link add name prp0 type hsr slave1 eth0 slave2 eth1 supervision 45 proto 1 ifconfig prp0 192.168.2.10 ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth0 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8D ifconfig eth1 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8D ifconfig eth0 up ifconfig eth1 up ip link add name prp0 type hsr slave1 eth0 slave2 eth1 supervision 45 proto 1 ifconfig prp0 192.168.2.20 command to show node table ---------------------------- Ping the peer board after the prp0 interface is up. The remote node (DAN-P) will be shown in the node table as below. root@am57xx-evm:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/hsr/prp0/node_table Node Table entries for (PRP) device MAC-Address-A, MAC-Address-B, time_in[A], time_in[B], Address-B port, SAN-A, SAN-B, DAN-P 70:ff:76:1c:0e:8c 00:00:00:00:00:00 ffffe83f, ffffe83f, 0, 0, 0, 1 Try to capture the raw PRP frames at the eth0 interface as tcpdump -i eth0 -xxx Sample Supervision frames and ARP frames shown below. ================================================================================== Successive Supervision frames captured with tcpdump (with RCT at the end): 03:43:29.500999 70:ff:76:1c:0e:8d (oui Unknown) > 01:15:4e:00:01:2d (oui Unknown), ethertype Unknown (0x88f 0x0000: 0115 4e00 012d 70ff 761c 0e8d 88fb 0001 0x0010: 7e0a 1406 70ff 761c 0e8d 0000 0000 0000 0x0020: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fc2b a034 0x0040: 88fb 03:43:31.581025 70:ff:76:1c:0e:8d (oui Unknown) > 01:15:4e:00:01:2d (oui Unknown), ethertype Unknown (0x88f 0x0000: 0115 4e00 012d 70ff 761c 0e8d 88fb 0001 0x0010: 7e0b 1406 70ff 761c 0e8d 0000 0000 0000 0x0020: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 fc2c a034 0x0040: 88fb ICMP Echo request frame with RCT 03:43:33.805354 IP 192.168.2.20 > 192.168.2.10: ICMP echo request, id 63748, seq 1, length 64 0x0000: 70ff 761c 0e8c 70ff 761c 0e8d 0800 4500 0x0010: 0054 26a4 4000 4001 8e96 c0a8 0214 c0a8 0x0020: 020a 0800 c28e f904 0001 202e 1c3d 0000 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0x0040: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0x0050: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0x0060: 0000 fc31 a05a 88fb ================================================================================== The iperf3 traffic test logs can be accessed at the links below. DUT-1: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/8SkQzWJMn8/ DUT-2: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/j2BZvvs7p4/ Other tests done. - Connect a SAN (eth0 and eth1 without prp interface) and do ping test from eth0 (192.168.2.40) to prp0 (192.168.2.10) verify the SAN node shows at the correct link A and B as shown in the node table dump - Regress HSR interface using 3 nodes connected in a ring topology. create hsr link version 0. Do iperf3 test between all nodes create hsr link version 1. Do iperf3 test between all nodes. --------eth0 eth1 --------eth0 eth1-------| |AM572x|----------------------|AM572x|--------------|AM572x| | | | | ------| | --------eth1---| ------- | eth0 ------- |------------------------------- command used for HSR interface HSR V0 ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth0 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth1 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth0 up ifconfig eth1 up ip link add name hsr0 type hsr slave1 eth0 slave2 eth1 supervision 45 version 0 ifconfig hsr0 192.168.2.10 HSR V1 ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 down ifconfig eth0 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth1 hw ether 70:FF:76:1C:0E:8C ifconfig eth0 up ifconfig eth1 up ip link add name hsr0 type hsr slave1 eth0 slave2 eth1 supervision 45 version 1 ifconfig hsr0 192.168.2.10 Logs at DUT-1 : https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/6PSJbZwQ6y/ DUT-2 : https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/T8TqJsPRHc/ DUT-3 : https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/VNzpv6HzKj/ - Build tests :- Build with CONFIG_HSR=m allmodconfig build build with CONFIG_HSR=y and rebuild with sparse checker make C=1 zImage; make modules Version history: v5 : Fixed comments about Kconfig changes on Patch 1/7 against v4 Rebased to netnext/master branch. v4 : fixed following vs v3 reverse xmas tree for local variables check for return type in call to skb_put_padto() v3 : Separated bug fixes from this series and send them for immediate merge But for that this is same as v2. v2 : updated comments on RFC. Following are the main changes:- - Removed the hsr_prp prefix - Added PRP information in header files to indicate the support for PRP explicitely - Re-use netlink socket interface with an added parameter proto for identifying PRP. - Use function pointers using a proto_ops struct to do things differently for PRP vs HSR. RFC: initial version posted and discussed at https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg656229.html Murali Karicheri (7): hsr: enhance netlink socket interface to support PRP net: hsr: introduce common code for skb initialization net: hsr: introduce protocol specific function pointers net: prp: add supervision frame generation utility function net: hsr: define and use proto_ops ptrs to handle hsr specific frames net: prp: add packet handling support net: prp: enhance debugfs to display PRP info include/uapi/linux/hsr_netlink.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 12 +- net/hsr/Kconfig | 35 ++-- net/hsr/hsr_debugfs.c | 33 +++- net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 181 ++++++++++++++---- net/hsr/hsr_device.h | 2 + net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 313 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------- net/hsr/hsr_forward.h | 16 +- net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c | 95 ++++++++-- net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h | 31 ++- net/hsr/hsr_main.c | 2 + net/hsr/hsr_main.h | 120 +++++++++++- net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c | 38 +++- net/hsr/hsr_netlink.h | 2 + net/hsr/hsr_slave.c | 26 ++- net/hsr/hsr_slave.h | 4 + 16 files changed, 743 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1