From patchwork Wed Mar 30 22:09:53 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: gary.robertson@linaro.org X-Patchwork-Id: 64732 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.199.169 with SMTP id jl9csp2842318lbc; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.225.6 with SMTP id v6mr13714634qhb.0.1459375885465; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from lists.linaro.org (lists.linaro.org. [54.225.227.206]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y98si5262127qgd.112.2016.03.30.15.11.25; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of lng-odp-bounces@lists.linaro.org designates 54.225.227.206 as permitted sender) client-ip=54.225.227.206; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of lng-odp-bounces@lists.linaro.org designates 54.225.227.206 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lng-odp-bounces@lists.linaro.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: by lists.linaro.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id 02FBA61A10; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:11:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on ip-10-142-244-252 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linaro.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1F261A08; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:10:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Delivered-To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Received: by lists.linaro.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id 96EAC61A0B; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:10:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com (mail-oi0-f53.google.com [209.85.218.53]) by lists.linaro.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA93619FF for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id d205so35222585oia.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:10:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=ND9MD5jDIWZXhrC4RTDHHDt1VtIove8QfZu+YvVVaPQ=; b=OQtd7rQEwzAdd4cB5ESPF3Kpg3q6rBAOKYDGa95F/WZe3pPLnCBHUaxhjtefVRGAIs kTLd+dLtCJUalqrLNTw6nRR8Zn4Q/NbPvdzgrZDwEgrFqL6KI5qXdp0IfWgB4EuH08yp NKaB/WDbMuMXzd4Pe1YC9HmLxc8tLAlCzGMPlj6vWhuMV3AFDYstKEmFZafRE2UF8hjB RqSA+S0f47xqDjtnVB02Mdgy0JicVkW0ePH05nQIqHwaIcfyoX4y8DlJZADeLmMNXCZp MHnhKzpwATObCX9alM+6T6wLEHCB+hWN7cs9q3HmCQ7Mdx8XHE1vKMRUnES+ZN4lmwy5 1oaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKG7ahZ/0KL02qz2yJvlLjwIOyp4qwIpa4HO1wv2pAg8w7f3UIkwUf8N1kjug/5nJ7CBcE= X-Received: by 10.157.16.19 with SMTP id h19mr3668760ote.181.1459375818071; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from honkintosh.cybertech.lan (65-120-133-114.dia.static.qwest.net. [65.120.133.114]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 91sm1813924otg.16.2016.03.30.15.10.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:10:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Gary S. Robertson" To: mike.holmes@linaro.org, bill.fischofer@linaro.org, maxim.uvarov@linaro.org, anders.roxell@linaro.org, petri.savolainen@linaro.org Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:09:53 -0500 Message-Id: <1459375796-23992-3-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1459375796-23992-1-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> References: <1456929250-7720-1-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> <1459375796-23992-1-git-send-email-gary.robertson@linaro.org> X-Topics: patch Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: [lng-odp] [api-next][PATCH V6 2/5] test: allow more than one control cpu X-BeenThere: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: "The OpenDataPlane \(ODP\) List" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Errors-To: lng-odp-bounces@lists.linaro.org Sender: "lng-odp" A second issue was discovered in the validation test code after fixing bug 2027 and creating default cpumasks containing all installed CPUs. See Linaro BUG 2027 for details. https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2027 The cpumask validation test expected exactly one control CPU and returned an error otherwise. This change considers one or more control CPUs to be correct. Signed-off-by: Gary S. Robertson --- test/validation/cpumask/cpumask.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test/validation/cpumask/cpumask.c b/test/validation/cpumask/cpumask.c index 017332a..24e67b0 100644 --- a/test/validation/cpumask/cpumask.c +++ b/test/validation/cpumask/cpumask.c @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void cpumask_test_odp_cpumask_def(void) mask_count = odp_cpumask_count(&mask); CU_ASSERT(mask_count == num_control); - CU_ASSERT(num_control == 1); + CU_ASSERT(num_control >= 1); CU_ASSERT(num_worker <= available_cpus); CU_ASSERT(num_worker > 0); }