From patchwork Mon Jun 10 10:51:36 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Viresh Kumar X-Patchwork-Id: 166308 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 2002:a92:4782:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e2csp873277ilk; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz75CUOPLWTnoXZHJ3s3tMU2V6o/0ed7d3SZZE4bUloIBuWFOlHT+7M7aW5/ramCYP5Ss3/ X-Received: by 2002:a65:5345:: with SMTP id w5mr15166761pgr.110.1560163934341; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560163934; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I0JZBXkRXr/bJHe255mgwzr2jhdqqvRJnAYMkrpJ6uOBqlMfpfjMW5VzAmOqmDe6Hb xKjctI/9dyoFlKwphALpagaB3+JquOwQ2Y3BFAi27UscjtbSm9Nv1xcAxSn3Isjdvu0Q KJmCu2rUbDQS03Z8Z+XE4PwqZTk6qpqzs5zchJvyDVk+fiAW6qa9eR1KLBx4t7HoWsng GKBvia+xnDQOSJ9g91bkiXbWhPSnVwxP42L9+ijrsHxSksEn4j3OyM7QiATRhS6mR5la kYJ2aHW28+8c0zxiG9XOgpqglFL0EiFZo9t8K8sBhBkA4TFPJ2pPs+aZn2SBqZ+1plP+ YNSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=kF1gfE2iFj/xBErd3TwYUcdGFOPQsFXUuTNqUTUTBvo=; b=MIsqmQcv7ohBg7obwCYpOyHmmEbpW1UU+qEVF/KLSleUfnAWjA42pWxYFV6+OAhDN1 0Kt05Er4WNBb2TWZlL1wG5vM4qqLhG+FDpP7lQuIgyWW/PvUNT3holUD1MeA5fFWEyMO fVUtnL+RMB8xJqECRMF97aG804PZ3wAhXhy5/oAJFcfXohhucyNv56EIcT9MnPJXYfU2 7cdbdZRuN9LqTUB1R/YnQ8cs6LBYy9qKG0GITv7jFH2BsQn6aic9v0EoWjthDX4qat/+ +lhYiJy3XzgyQROgraf/xDeM44QBgOEFfDMPZPr4PdGJDvslMxLX3sB7xKhC5WGnDYki kt5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=CbrXhgBf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c145si9616278pfb.9.2019.06.10.03.52.14; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=CbrXhgBf; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389635AbfFJKwN (ORCPT + 30 others); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:52:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:37041 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389623AbfFJKwJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:52:09 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id bh12so3505780plb.4 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kF1gfE2iFj/xBErd3TwYUcdGFOPQsFXUuTNqUTUTBvo=; b=CbrXhgBfjgryUePAWrlajFiZbQHaXxOplnnQadGyazSwsVWYJe40B1OXpxt7xYx0P1 t/LFJAUotF0btUWYdNV/FpkdFbjh4nrbXl3PlnravdgjnHbNzIlvW+QNuINYILErIn5F ATEmCH1s/5o22AO+ogxPVxlj4+YmNOxGQA9HaGW7fQlLngyX9mfwj7PXt1a7csVCKUym MFXteTZuQKLTuYZC3grNAkv+WMD+8gPVwIsPOuElzgZ6ix4QjX0B0paO68OaHnAg1xKY IROAaCNltBewMalh9kawVUUA4FKmwm4XszelnfwTLSnkyfQDUQoxyLYw23aRm43LXj9x VV4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kF1gfE2iFj/xBErd3TwYUcdGFOPQsFXUuTNqUTUTBvo=; b=IpN1jNPFbAGFk9MU2/0BZDC+9nlPhLrJjgkGnBxvSluXaxc8ayHFL7U5btuCaqxFCp X1s0T8Ze5VIVdzKKnvqpuYfl+6GerT0qheNfvqBJOLgKzLlyxBzR3sLqPwm4PFoy2iXa abvEfXGXIwg7tXnsLFmIOUkinBDOPxlgOT4wAjKYnc3gd1N7JMA6U6hZO6iehqb0GRjA IxToPgwSDbLiEndcJtePxj8ctHdiswB23N2NSpeb5G4nPWtXEdrXjUycLuaNu3IIXHMk 22tkBpA9xDh3FxdjQn6c2PI5m1aIbNOjXzBZdxtdm3Y5pPcKfAMxLJ5A/xrH8t4VLVVe Da6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFXDWLXEPkeL7Wf+NICKm75G+JMIN2ymwi28CxQrANNVjHBX1J wRU4dDdqMaaBw5UJdAbdPcln0g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7083:: with SMTP id z3mr5366735plk.205.1560163928529; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.66.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18sm7840154pfy.0.2019.06.10.03.52.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 03:52:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Viresh Kumar To: Rafael Wysocki Cc: Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot , Qais.Yousef@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:21:36 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This implements QoS requests to manage userspace configuration of min and max frequency. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 8 +--- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) -- 2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 547d221b2ff2..ff754981fcb4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -720,23 +720,15 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) static ssize_t store_##file_name \ (struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf, size_t count) \ { \ - int ret, temp; \ - struct cpufreq_policy new_policy; \ + unsigned long val; \ + int ret; \ \ - memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); \ - new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min; \ - new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max; \ - \ - ret = sscanf(buf, "%u", &new_policy.object); \ + ret = sscanf(buf, "%lu", &val); \ if (ret != 1) \ return -EINVAL; \ \ - temp = new_policy.object; \ - ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); \ - if (!ret) \ - policy->user_policy.object = temp; \ - \ - return ret ? ret : count; \ + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(policy->object##_freq_req, val);\ + return ret && ret != 1 ? ret : count; \ } store_one(scaling_min_freq, min); @@ -1133,10 +1125,6 @@ static void cpufreq_update_freq_work(struct work_struct *work) container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, req_work); struct cpufreq_policy new_policy = *policy; - /* We should read constraint values from QoS layer */ - new_policy.min = 0; - new_policy.max = UINT_MAX; - down_write(&policy->rwsem); if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) @@ -1243,6 +1231,12 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) goto err_min_qos_notifier; } + policy->min_freq_req = kzalloc(2 * sizeof(*policy->min_freq_req), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!policy->min_freq_req) + goto err_max_qos_notifier; + + policy->max_freq_req = policy->min_freq_req + 1; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list); init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem); spin_lock_init(&policy->transition_lock); @@ -1254,6 +1248,9 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu) policy->cpu = cpu; return policy; +err_max_qos_notifier: + dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_max, + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY); err_min_qos_notifier: dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_min, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY); @@ -1289,6 +1286,10 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY); dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier(dev, &policy->nb_min, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY); + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(policy->max_freq_req); + dev_pm_qos_remove_request(policy->min_freq_req); + kfree(policy->min_freq_req); + cpufreq_policy_put_kobj(policy); free_cpumask_var(policy->real_cpus); free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus); @@ -1366,16 +1367,30 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) cpumask_and(policy->cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_online_mask); if (new_policy) { - policy->user_policy.min = policy->min; - policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; + struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); for_each_cpu(j, policy->related_cpus) { per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, j) = policy; add_cpu_dev_symlink(policy, j); } - } else { - policy->min = policy->user_policy.min; - policy->max = policy->user_policy.max; + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, policy->min_freq_req, + DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY, + policy->min); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add min-freq constraint (%d)\n", + ret); + goto out_destroy_policy; + } + + ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, policy->max_freq_req, + DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY, + policy->max); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to add max-freq constraint (%d)\n", + ret); + goto out_destroy_policy; + } } if (cpufreq_driver->get && !cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) { @@ -2366,7 +2381,6 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, { struct cpufreq_governor *old_gov; struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu); - unsigned long min, max; int ret; pr_debug("setting new policy for CPU %u: %u - %u kHz\n", @@ -2374,24 +2388,12 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, memcpy(&new_policy->cpuinfo, &policy->cpuinfo, sizeof(policy->cpuinfo)); - /* - * This check works well when we store new min/max freq attributes, - * because new_policy is a copy of policy with one field updated. - */ - if (new_policy->min > new_policy->max) - return -EINVAL; - /* * PM QoS framework collects all the requests from users and provide us * the final aggregated value here. */ - min = dev_pm_qos_read_value(cpu_dev, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY); - max = dev_pm_qos_read_value(cpu_dev, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY); - - if (min > new_policy->min) - new_policy->min = min; - if (max < new_policy->max) - new_policy->max = max; + new_policy->min = dev_pm_qos_read_value(cpu_dev, DEV_PM_QOS_MIN_FREQUENCY); + new_policy->max = dev_pm_qos_read_value(cpu_dev, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY); /* verify the cpu speed can be set within this limit */ ret = cpufreq_driver->verify(new_policy); @@ -2480,10 +2482,9 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, * @cpu: CPU to re-evaluate the policy for. * * Update the current frequency for the cpufreq policy of @cpu and use - * cpufreq_set_policy() to re-apply the min and max limits saved in the - * user_policy sub-structure of that policy, which triggers the evaluation - * of policy notifiers and the cpufreq driver's ->verify() callback for the - * policy in question, among other things. + * cpufreq_set_policy() to re-apply the min and max limits, which triggers the + * evaluation of policy notifiers and the cpufreq driver's ->verify() callback + * for the policy in question, among other things. */ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) { @@ -2503,8 +2504,6 @@ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu) pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu); memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy)); - new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min; - new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max; cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy); @@ -2549,10 +2548,9 @@ static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state) break; } - down_write(&policy->rwsem); - policy->user_policy.max = policy->max; - cpufreq_governor_limits(policy); - up_write(&policy->rwsem); + ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(policy->max_freq_req, policy->max); + if (ret) + break; } return ret; diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 0fe7678da9c2..6bbed9af4fd2 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -50,11 +50,6 @@ struct cpufreq_cpuinfo { unsigned int transition_latency; }; -struct cpufreq_user_policy { - unsigned int min; /* in kHz */ - unsigned int max; /* in kHz */ -}; - struct cpufreq_policy { /* CPUs sharing clock, require sw coordination */ cpumask_var_t cpus; /* Online CPUs only */ @@ -85,7 +80,8 @@ struct cpufreq_policy { * called, but you're in IRQ context */ struct work_struct req_work; - struct cpufreq_user_policy user_policy; + struct dev_pm_qos_request *min_freq_req; + struct dev_pm_qos_request *max_freq_req; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table; enum cpufreq_table_sorting freq_table_sorted;