From patchwork Tue Jun 7 12:17:05 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "\(Exiting\) Baolin Wang" X-Patchwork-Id: 69505 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.106.246 with SMTP id e109csp1946762qgf; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 05:18:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.36.121.202 with SMTP id z193mr3306218itc.9.1465301912887; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i124si34803109pfg.4.2016.06.07.05.18.31; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161200AbcFGMS0 (ORCPT + 31 others); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:18:26 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f177.google.com ([209.85.192.177]:33164 "EHLO mail-pf0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161091AbcFGMSW (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:18:22 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f177.google.com with SMTP id y124so17953847pfy.0 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:18:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:references; bh=JrnmqpJJckOrnPZH2ETGagU+nog3J7+1RSv1kF6Yn5o=; b=VN4VNa9fU0zcokAnRPZeyWCWRGoetId2VUD4BKtZ6/u4jsLMFvLJf2XqQ8yJh6ybZu K1pdCJD9SNYpAWg8xnv8JuNapqeVjlDCAd75DM4Dhnc5h8L5y7uCnq+QL2di3N3OfR4w ch17jA0OhTPkhS5feBrMGadi1Q7KRW2FpalAk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:in-reply-to:references; bh=JrnmqpJJckOrnPZH2ETGagU+nog3J7+1RSv1kF6Yn5o=; b=ftTWggveoUug9b8AMoOgxvMULnvXvW8+gIOCVUgz3OJVUSYd8gBzPEWY+yBDXR3Iqa 334Sa2nYvcFqhkG7Er0OSAqlXMRLX2s7GoLocMUiyYp2MD6KItKO+Idoqe2XC+pIW2Bl 5ndQ4C+jA2Rg5sCemuYQEMGEeJ57TxFLnv51XuA4vVKfJlU/ToSEYOuGBtbmbBqpwzqG 4OYp2NBaWOYJfN/SufbcGFWrym2asscUaJwfVnUkB2OdRzyyGRmGJzzNfOPrG0iPZAG3 IURb5e9WVivvqWbynXDP7yUghFHwhKfgWKQQE9nlaCWPQnQe7nNCoP3LkJh50uNOrXwP tISA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLLqe1XGxaiUuEFrvL+glu8WO/NM0mij1eXwxGmk7aifmA0ML471SG/nE2YbPU7qxLY X-Received: by 10.98.210.66 with SMTP id c63mr1418002pfg.25.1465301901345; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from baolinwangubtpc.spreadtrum.com ([175.111.195.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r64sm34995877pfi.54.2016.06.07.05.18.15 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jun 2016 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Baolin Wang To: axboe@kernel.dk, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net Cc: ebiggers3@gmail.com, js1304@gmail.com, tadeusz.struk@intel.com, smueller@chronox.de, standby24x7@gmail.com, shli@kernel.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, sagig@mellanox.com, kent.overstreet@gmail.com, keith.busch@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, ming.lei@canonical.com, broonie@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baolin.wang@linaro.org Subject: [RFC v4 2/4] crypto: Introduce CRYPTO_ALG_BULK flag Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:17:05 +0800 Message-Id: <238ce3d506051c863300b90720c3e103175747cc.1465301616.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Now some cipher hardware engines prefer to handle bulk block rather than one sector (512 bytes) created by dm-crypt, cause these cipher engines can handle the intermediate values (IV) by themselves in one bulk block. This means we can increase the size of the request by merging request rather than always 512 bytes and thus increase the hardware engine processing speed. So introduce 'CRYPTO_ALG_BULK' flag to indicate this cipher can support bulk mode. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang --- include/crypto/skcipher.h | 7 +++++++ include/linux/crypto.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+) -- 1.7.9.5 diff --git a/include/crypto/skcipher.h b/include/crypto/skcipher.h index 0f987f5..d89d29a 100644 --- a/include/crypto/skcipher.h +++ b/include/crypto/skcipher.h @@ -519,5 +519,12 @@ static inline void skcipher_request_set_crypt( req->iv = iv; } +static inline unsigned int skcipher_is_bulk_mode(struct crypto_skcipher *sk_tfm) +{ + struct crypto_tfm *tfm = crypto_skcipher_tfm(sk_tfm); + + return crypto_tfm_alg_bulk(tfm); +} + #endif /* _CRYPTO_SKCIPHER_H */ diff --git a/include/linux/crypto.h b/include/linux/crypto.h index 6e28c89..a315487 100644 --- a/include/linux/crypto.h +++ b/include/linux/crypto.h @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ #define CRYPTO_ALG_DEAD 0x00000020 #define CRYPTO_ALG_DYING 0x00000040 #define CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC 0x00000080 +#define CRYPTO_ALG_BULK 0x00000100 /* * Set this bit if and only if the algorithm requires another algorithm of @@ -623,6 +624,11 @@ static inline u32 crypto_tfm_alg_type(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) return tfm->__crt_alg->cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_TYPE_MASK; } +static inline unsigned int crypto_tfm_alg_bulk(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) +{ + return tfm->__crt_alg->cra_flags & CRYPTO_ALG_BULK; +} + static inline unsigned int crypto_tfm_alg_blocksize(struct crypto_tfm *tfm) { return tfm->__crt_alg->cra_blocksize;