From patchwork Wed Jun 26 21:37:15 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jeremy Linton X-Patchwork-Id: 167862 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 2002:a92:4782:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e2csp1463614ilk; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwl127uY6VyNjv+ovDjTOK29mN/mT7PgYApbO3+VPRaXqcp4DiqdStTIWR7vl/AIjx0HGDl X-Received: by 2002:a63:1f47:: with SMTP id q7mr140380pgm.264.1561585056494; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1561585056; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cBQ4oZJcWR94/eukOBDEgfyffVVe8MC0h+PfRCSeaCkqwjnv5FJgGUjESnw3CO4Tbe YRlyfXgIH8c1kWlDGryvpSqAhhnhhCMOn5cAHXI4tEdDYXdbE7FFPti6YYq5PUriWtw4 LA9FnKF37K6ep21opdK4r4ws81l5PyYVc2qTrH8Zljlizh7gFP9nBXkrO1+UQU70ZCX4 nUO+7rd7+6PLxEz5aiXLrWJN0c0I+SrNRbN/NVhjbt9HQgvXVMTk63czkWwRFu2wNabw m1zEEYaFi4qCwAsfvukQyFCfPRU5jZ2m3IFEBplxXOEX6/iVfb55atA8i+M+ulmoKVTI 74/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=0DI12ezRjnBWQtQ1D2IOEZFwvK3Z3ZiIq/67XNV54fw=; b=CAI0GOhvvue2LbN8UifCd2e37GfCgU+OaqKHHpkMR6W/lTVyA2v+bUJL3pRRNIVPM4 sx3oe8IIF+VzW7u6OsbumabU0xDlRRTglICc61eQpFnikolHypuTe6G7cqmgcQ1PgRWp OaPSNOdEBAZQT+Xa++QDe6UcH6dE6Ylv+XJ3pfI9jNXuyu+0jlc3hKfsRYNJy7cVM+Kj 2hdxvjpowr1X2NbqMUhJwph6ovLSg5NxxHL0U8Qj2RP4cU8KRSVhYe2w0/X9Vh5WSdbP 48P8wtmItBgXOT0LZzNaZrNweXOhkGJKp+HSFoEXOfLsPwUBzJcwTIicJX0vlEi3SFOG syPw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t1si178178pgv.169.2019.06.26.14.37.36; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726462AbfFZVhf (ORCPT + 30 others); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:37:35 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:41430 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726223AbfFZVhd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jun 2019 17:37:33 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E27D6E; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com (mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com [10.118.30.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2587D3F246; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, Jeremy Linton , Hanjun Gou Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:37:15 -0500 Message-Id: <20190626213718.39423-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190626213718.39423-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20190626213718.39423-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The ACPI specification implies that the IDENTICAL flag should be set on all non leaf nodes where the children are identical. This means that we need to be searching for the last node with the identical flag set rather than the first one. Since this flag is also dependent on the table revision, we need to add a bit of extra code to verify the table revision, and the next node's state in the traversal. Since we want to avoid function pointers here, lets just special case the IDENTICAL flag. Tested-by: Hanjun Gou Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.21.0 diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c index b72e6afaa8fb..05344413f199 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c @@ -432,17 +432,40 @@ static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table, } } +static bool flag_identical(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu) +{ + struct acpi_pptt_processor *next; + + /* heterogeneous machines must use PPTT revision > 1 */ + if (table_hdr->revision < 2) + return false; + + /* Locate the last node in the tree with IDENTICAL set */ + if (cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) { + next = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent); + if (!(next && next->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL)) + return true; + } + + return false; +} + /* Passing level values greater than this will result in search termination */ #define PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE 0xFF -static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, - struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu, - int level, int flag) +static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr, + struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu, + int level, int flag) { struct acpi_pptt_processor *prev_node; while (cpu && level) { - if (cpu->flags & flag) + /* special case the identical flag to find last identical */ + if (flag == ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) { + if (flag_identical(table_hdr, cpu)) + break; + } else if (cpu->flags & flag) break; pr_debug("level %d\n", level); prev_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent); @@ -480,8 +503,8 @@ static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table, cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id); if (cpu_node) { - cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_package_id(table, cpu_node, - level, flag); + cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_tag(table, cpu_node, + level, flag); /* * As per specification if the processor structure represents * an actual processor, then ACPI processor ID must be valid.