From patchwork Mon Apr 15 17:49:07 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 162247 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 2002:a02:c6d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id r24csp3218393jan; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmR5aYzflhlnX7/vdTYiYuDfApS7+a9zYsh/BdiR5fYUcz9ESqXoheWkVG11duZVBzVhMh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:599c:: with SMTP id p28mr14544253pli.70.1555350603223; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1555350603; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n86VMQ4/IqilpNFpFO8Q1dvf9yHW3ZlRU+ZMgbNXst+E1sdh+dv+WIDxh3r/vxiMwt 44EgPWtfhQAErD2HikAzKeYzgrPb4o0A7IreRWXR8+Pw69+qDiWNlBbNE9oDvm5v+APv iFFJueErCauOhYyLIOjDq8duNbc7ZYFnaACTmVbYC2rvRO7XAotIZQEK40s4ccBYq4XY QPeU+1cDSRoXQN9pRXzXWljwLDTuDpizrbQJgLxfDnKmhaFnNN7BuQLtnbRtt5na23UN A871Y74ZhVEcFgPRjZ6RQJn82XlSCCZ8apWMSShwexU+HaMVEc4pPdzyW0SCBAlwwpJq ftCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=/ctch9BIG/gBXs/UumXXhUGfeedoBTKJpXlhlTSkdIA=; b=iLoIIUUGd12K+0zqiehvGLp8s2LnO17YN8wnJunXnJ9TGKL04OcQaEGlCQO7oNQaIw RiXT6uMy/bJwz/0ytmD+piTbE+Xq0Q75UnxBsrlqgJSXMMMcOB2+UsnoakQuPonsv20H rmbHUf3PMfZ9C1YIFKPrkVfmOKWaNOk0mvHUl/fEEpYeeclMHLFKrDS2h4heVfCA5Uu8 DPXJxuWoXRxvWsF6gSIH5LO6JXpLIraSUm+IJAboJJm4CZcD0Y3eW89/PJ8FMFV5GP+V CShBVfDDXfGb/ovuEuxo4IMMUlDby3nUPvM4GSDmsghSDC6nLwCszcfR07/C7aNhe0yL okGw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u70si35242118pgu.119.2019.04.15.10.50.02; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728116AbfDORuB (ORCPT + 30 others); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:50:01 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:49796 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728036AbfDORtx (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:49:53 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 02E473ED7A4E7FCD7631; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from FRA1000014316.huawei.com (100.126.230.97) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:42 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , CC: =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Keith Busch , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , , Andrew Morton , "Jonathan Cameron" Subject: [PATCH 4/4 V3] ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:07 +0800 Message-ID: <20190415174907.102307-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190415174907.102307-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> References: <20190415174907.102307-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [100.126.230.97] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Until we tell ACPI that we support generic initiators, it will have to operate in fall back domain mode and all _PXM entries should be on existing non GI domains. This patch sets the relevant OSC bit to make that happen. Note that this currently doesn't take into account whether we have the relevant setup code for a given architecture. Do we want to make this optional, or should the initial patch set just enable it for all ACPI supporting architectures? Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/acpi/bus.c | 1 + include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.19.1 diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c index eec263c9019e..ef251f454a5b 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c @@ -315,6 +315,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_support(void) capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT; capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT; + capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] |= OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT; #ifdef CONFIG_X86 if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP)) { diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index d5dcebd7aad3..cc68b2ad0630 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_osc_context *context); #define OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000080 #define OSC_SB_OSLPI_SUPPORT 0x00000100 #define OSC_SB_CPC_DIVERSE_HIGH_SUPPORT 0x00001000 +#define OSC_SB_GENERIC_INITIATOR_SUPPORT 0x00002000 extern bool osc_sb_apei_support_acked; extern bool osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed;