Message ID | 20180313114205.27714-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c: fix implicit declaration | expand |
On 03/13/2018 04:42 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > gcc warns about implicit declaration. > > gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../../../include/uapi/ > -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ > memfd_test.c common.o -o memfd_test > memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_get_seals’: > memfd_test.c:74:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fcntl’ > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS); > ^~~~~ > memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_open’: > memfd_test.c:197:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’ > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > r = open(buf, flags, mode); > ^~~~ > memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_write’: > memfd_test.c:328:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fallocate’ > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > r = fallocate(fd, > ^~~~~~~~~ > > In the current code, we include the headers that the functions want > according to the man pages, and we add some defines that will be used if > they isn't found in glibc. The defines was added into the kernel source > in kernel >= 3.16 and glibc requires kernel header files >= 3.2. > > Fixes: 4f5ce5e8d7e2 ("selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests") > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c > index 10baa1652fc2..0dbeb29c094c 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c > @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ > #include <inttypes.h> > #include <limits.h> > #include <linux/falloc.h> > -#include <linux/fcntl.h> > #include <linux/memfd.h> > #include <sched.h> > #include <stdio.h> > @@ -14,13 +13,37 @@ > #include <signal.h> > #include <string.h> > #include <sys/mman.h> > +#include <sys/types.h> > #include <sys/stat.h> > #include <sys/syscall.h> > #include <sys/wait.h> > +#include <fcntl.h> > #include <unistd.h> I suspect there is some guiding philosophy for selftests that I am unfamiliar with. However, it seems that tests should use as much of the header files in the current kernel source tree as possible. This change removes the include of a header in the current source tree <linux/fcntl.h>. It replaces that with the header <fcntl.h> from the host system (and some other changes). To me, this seems like step in the wrong direction. But, I could be totally wrong and perhaps self tests should primarily target the host system header files. -- Mike Kravetz
On 14 March 2018 at 02:09, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote: > On 03/13/2018 04:42 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >> gcc warns about implicit declaration. >> >> gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../../../include/uapi/ >> -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ >> memfd_test.c common.o -o memfd_test >> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_get_seals’: >> memfd_test.c:74:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fcntl’ >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS); >> ^~~~~ >> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_open’: >> memfd_test.c:197:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’ >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> r = open(buf, flags, mode); >> ^~~~ >> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_write’: >> memfd_test.c:328:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fallocate’ >> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> r = fallocate(fd, >> ^~~~~~~~~ >> >> In the current code, we include the headers that the functions want >> according to the man pages, and we add some defines that will be used if >> they isn't found in glibc. The defines was added into the kernel source >> in kernel >= 3.16 and glibc requires kernel header files >= 3.2. >> >> Fixes: 4f5ce5e8d7e2 ("selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests") >> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> >> --- >> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> index 10baa1652fc2..0dbeb29c094c 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ >> #include <inttypes.h> >> #include <limits.h> >> #include <linux/falloc.h> >> -#include <linux/fcntl.h> >> #include <linux/memfd.h> >> #include <sched.h> >> #include <stdio.h> >> @@ -14,13 +13,37 @@ >> #include <signal.h> >> #include <string.h> >> #include <sys/mman.h> >> +#include <sys/types.h> >> #include <sys/stat.h> >> #include <sys/syscall.h> >> #include <sys/wait.h> >> +#include <fcntl.h> >> #include <unistd.h> > > I suspect there is some guiding philosophy for selftests that I am > unfamiliar with. However, it seems that tests should use as much > of the header files in the current kernel source tree as possible. > This change removes the include of a header in the current source > tree <linux/fcntl.h>. It replaces that with the header <fcntl.h> > from the host system (and some other changes). > > To me, this seems like step in the wrong direction. But, I could > be totally wrong and perhaps self tests should primarily target the > host system header files. So in a way I agree with you. However, what was the design decisions internal kernel headers vs. headers from Host System ? For me it isn't clear how/when we use them, its a mix today is it not? To ignore warnings with -Wno-implicit-function-declaration wont be an alternative I think. Cheers, Anders > -- > Mike Kravetz
On 04/04/2018 04:36 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: > On 14 March 2018 at 02:09, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote: >> On 03/13/2018 04:42 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >>> gcc warns about implicit declaration. >>> >>> gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../../../include/uapi/ >>> -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ >>> memfd_test.c common.o -o memfd_test >>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_get_seals’: >>> memfd_test.c:74:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fcntl’ >>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>> r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS); >>> ^~~~~ >>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_open’: >>> memfd_test.c:197:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’ >>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>> r = open(buf, flags, mode); >>> ^~~~ >>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_write’: >>> memfd_test.c:328:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fallocate’ >>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>> r = fallocate(fd, >>> ^~~~~~~~~ >>> >>> In the current code, we include the headers that the functions want >>> according to the man pages, and we add some defines that will be used if >>> they isn't found in glibc. The defines was added into the kernel source >>> in kernel >= 3.16 and glibc requires kernel header files >= 3.2. >>> >>> Fixes: 4f5ce5e8d7e2 ("selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests") >>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>> index 10baa1652fc2..0dbeb29c094c 100644 >>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ >>> #include <inttypes.h> >>> #include <limits.h> >>> #include <linux/falloc.h> >>> -#include <linux/fcntl.h> >>> #include <linux/memfd.h> >>> #include <sched.h> >>> #include <stdio.h> >>> @@ -14,13 +13,37 @@ >>> #include <signal.h> >>> #include <string.h> >>> #include <sys/mman.h> >>> +#include <sys/types.h> >>> #include <sys/stat.h> >>> #include <sys/syscall.h> >>> #include <sys/wait.h> >>> +#include <fcntl.h> >>> #include <unistd.h> >> >> I suspect there is some guiding philosophy for selftests that I am >> unfamiliar with. However, it seems that tests should use as much >> of the header files in the current kernel source tree as possible. >> This change removes the include of a header in the current source >> tree <linux/fcntl.h>. It replaces that with the header <fcntl.h> >> from the host system (and some other changes). >> >> To me, this seems like step in the wrong direction. But, I could >> be totally wrong and perhaps self tests should primarily target the >> host system header files. > > So in a way I agree with you. However, what was the design decisions > internal kernel headers vs. headers from Host System ? > For me it isn't clear how/when we use them, its a mix today is it not? I am unsure as well. Was hoping someone who was more involved in the development/design philosophy of self tests would chime in and comment. My thought that the tests should use more of the associated kernel header files is based on the fact that those header files 'should' be more aligned with the tests. The host system header files could be very different than those of the running kernel we are testing. > To ignore warnings with -Wno-implicit-function-declaration wont be an > alternative I think. I am not opposed to your changes. Again, was just hoping to discover what should be the direction/philosophy for header file use. -- Mike Kravetz
On 04/04/2018 09:32 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote: > On 04/04/2018 04:36 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >> On 14 March 2018 at 02:09, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> wrote: >>> On 03/13/2018 04:42 AM, Anders Roxell wrote: >>>> gcc warns about implicit declaration. >>>> >>>> gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../../../include/uapi/ >>>> -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ >>>> memfd_test.c common.o -o memfd_test >>>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_get_seals’: >>>> memfd_test.c:74:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fcntl’ >>>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>> r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS); >>>> ^~~~~ >>>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_open’: >>>> memfd_test.c:197:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’ >>>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>> r = open(buf, flags, mode); >>>> ^~~~ >>>> memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_write’: >>>> memfd_test.c:328:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fallocate’ >>>> [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >>>> r = fallocate(fd, >>>> ^~~~~~~~~ >>>> >>>> In the current code, we include the headers that the functions want >>>> according to the man pages, and we add some defines that will be used if >>>> they isn't found in glibc. The defines was added into the kernel source >>>> in kernel >= 3.16 and glibc requires kernel header files >= 3.2>>>> >>>> Fixes: 4f5ce5e8d7e2 ("selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests") >>>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> >>>> --- >>>> tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>>> index 10baa1652fc2..0dbeb29c094c 100644 >>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c >>>> @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ >>>> #include <inttypes.h> >>>> #include <limits.h> >>>> #include <linux/falloc.h> >>>> -#include <linux/fcntl.h> We don't want to change this to fix the warnings. This will defeat the purpose of testing the kernel including the headers. >>>> #include <linux/memfd.h> >>>> #include <sched.h> >>>> #include <stdio.h> >>>> @@ -14,13 +13,37 @@ >>>> #include <signal.h> >>>> #include <string.h> >>>> #include <sys/mman.h> >>>> +#include <sys/types.h> >>>> #include <sys/stat.h> >>>> #include <sys/syscall.h> >>>> #include <sys/wait.h> >>>> +#include <fcntl.h> >>>> #include <unistd.h> >>> >>> I suspect there is some guiding philosophy for selftests that I am >>> unfamiliar with. However, it seems that tests should use as much >>> of the header files in the current kernel source tree as possible. >>> This change removes the include of a header in the current source >>> tree <linux/fcntl.h>. It replaces that with the header <fcntl.h> >>> from the host system (and some other changes). >>> >>> To me, this seems like step in the wrong direction. But, I could >>> be totally wrong and perhaps self tests should primarily target the >>> host system header files. >> >> So in a way I agree with you. However, what was the design decisions >> internal kernel headers vs. headers from Host System ? >> For me it isn't clear how/when we use them, its a mix today is it not? Internal headers are the primary focus to be able to find regressions. > > I am unsure as well. Was hoping someone who was more involved in the > development/design philosophy of self tests would chime in and comment. > > My thought that the tests should use more of the associated kernel header > files is based on the fact that those header files 'should' be more > aligned with the tests. The host system header files could be very > different than those of the running kernel we are testing. Right. The goal for these tests is to verify the kernel including the headers. So for best results, the tests should be built with the headers in the kernel not the ones that are installed on the system they are being built on. thanks, -- Shuah
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c index 10baa1652fc2..0dbeb29c094c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c @@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ #include <inttypes.h> #include <limits.h> #include <linux/falloc.h> -#include <linux/fcntl.h> #include <linux/memfd.h> #include <sched.h> #include <stdio.h> @@ -14,13 +13,37 @@ #include <signal.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mman.h> +#include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <sys/wait.h> +#include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> #include "common.h" +#ifndef F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE +# define F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE 1024 +#endif +#ifndef F_ADD_SEALS +# define F_ADD_SEALS (F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE + 9) +#endif +#ifndef F_GET_SEALS +# define F_GET_SEALS (F_LINUX_SPECIFIC_BASE + 10) +#endif +#ifndef F_SEAL_SEAL +# define F_SEAL_SEAL 0x0001 /* prevent further seals from being set */ +#endif +#ifndef F_SEAL_SHRINK +# define F_SEAL_SHRINK 0x0002 /* prevent file from shrinking */ +#endif +#ifndef F_SEAL_GROW +# define F_SEAL_GROW 0x0004 /* prevent file from growing */ +#endif +#ifndef F_SEAL_WRITE +# define F_SEAL_WRITE 0x0008 /* prevent writes */ +#endif + #define MEMFD_STR "memfd:" #define MEMFD_HUGE_STR "memfd-hugetlb:" #define SHARED_FT_STR "(shared file-table)"
gcc warns about implicit declaration. gcc -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../../../include/uapi/ -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ memfd_test.c common.o -o memfd_test memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_get_seals’: memfd_test.c:74:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fcntl’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] r = fcntl(fd, F_GET_SEALS); ^~~~~ memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_open’: memfd_test.c:197:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] r = open(buf, flags, mode); ^~~~ memfd_test.c: In function ‘mfd_assert_write’: memfd_test.c:328:6: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘fallocate’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] r = fallocate(fd, ^~~~~~~~~ In the current code, we include the headers that the functions want according to the man pages, and we add some defines that will be used if they isn't found in glibc. The defines was added into the kernel source in kernel >= 3.16 and glibc requires kernel header files >= 3.2. Fixes: 4f5ce5e8d7e2 ("selftests: add memfd_create() + sealing tests") Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.11.0