From patchwork Tue Jul 26 07:43:46 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Quentin Schulz X-Patchwork-Id: 72770 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.29.52 with SMTP id a49csp1545584qga; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:45:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.127.10 with SMTP id nc10mr36705341pab.109.1469519135000; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t20si37963404pal.236.2016.07.26.00.45.34; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:45:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755859AbcGZHpb (ORCPT + 29 others); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:45:31 -0400 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238]:53341 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754418AbcGZHod (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 03:44:33 -0400 Received: by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 0F87A17D0; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:44:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.free-electrons.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT, URIBL_BLOCKED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from quentin-Latitude-E6320.home (LStLambert-657-1-97-87.w90-63.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.63.216.87]) by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8246620C; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:44:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Quentin Schulz To: jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org, lee.jones@linaro.org Cc: Quentin Schulz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com, antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] mfd: mfd-core: reattach mfd of_node to cells without of_compatible Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:43:46 +0200 Message-Id: <1469519027-11387-4-git-send-email-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: <1469519027-11387-1-git-send-email-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> References: <1469519027-11387-1-git-send-email-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org When an MFD cell has an of_compatible (meaning it is present in the Device Tree), other nodes can reference it using a phandle. However when the MFD cell is not declared in the Device Tree, the only way other nodes can reference it are by using a phandle to the MFD. Then when this MFD cell tries to register itself in one framework, the registration is denied by the framework because it is not matching the of_node of the node which is referenced by the phandle in one of the other nodes. This reattaches the of_node of the MFD to the MFD cell device structure when the MFD cell has no of_compatible. Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz --- We need this modification to register the thermal sensor in the thermal framework. Added in v3. drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.5.0 diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c index 3ac486a..0b19663 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c @@ -175,12 +175,16 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id, if (ret < 0) goto fail_res; - if (parent->of_node && cell->of_compatible) { - for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) { - if (of_device_is_compatible(np, cell->of_compatible)) { - pdev->dev.of_node = np; - break; + if (parent->of_node) { + if (cell->of_compatible) { + for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) { + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, cell->of_compatible)) { + pdev->dev.of_node = np; + break; + } } + } else { + pdev->dev.of_node = parent->of_node; } }