From patchwork Mon Feb 1 22:12:56 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Valente X-Patchwork-Id: 60986 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.130.2 with SMTP id oa2csp371246lbb; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 14:55:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.66.233.103 with SMTP id tv7mr41578670pac.83.1454367325086; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:55:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g74si48934888pfg.144.2016.02.01.14.55.24; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 14:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754577AbcBAWzV (ORCPT + 30 others); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:55:21 -0500 Received: from spostino.sms.unimo.it ([155.185.44.3]:56006 "EHLO spostino.sms.unimo.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754068AbcBAWsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 17:48:21 -0500 Received: from [185.14.10.195] (port=35339 helo=localhost.localdomain) by spostino.sms.unimo.it with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aQMkL-0004Vs-R2; Mon, 01 Feb 2016 23:14:58 +0100 From: Paolo Valente To: Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo Cc: Fabio Checconi , Arianna Avanzini , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, broonie@kernel.org, Paolo Valente Subject: [PATCH RFC 20/22] block, bfq: boost the throughput on NCQ-capable flash-based devices Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 23:12:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1454364778-25179-21-git-send-email-paolo.valente@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1454364778-25179-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@linaro.org> References: <1454364778-25179-1-git-send-email-paolo.valente@linaro.org> UNIMORE-X-SA-Score: -2.9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch boosts the throughput on NCQ-capable flash-based devices, while still preserving latency guarantees for interactive and soft real-time applications. The throughput is boosted by just not idling the device when the in-service queue remains empty, even if the queue is sync and has a non-null idle window. This helps to keep the drive's internal queue full, which is necessary to achieve maximum performance. This solution to boost the throughput is a port of commits a68bbdd and f7d7b7a for CFQ. As already highlighted in a previous patch, allowing the device to prefetch and internally reorder requests trivially causes loss of control on the request service order, and hence on service guarantees. Fortunately, as discussed in detail in the comments on the function bfq_bfqq_must_not_expire(), if every process has to receive the same fraction of the throughput, then the service order enforced by the internal scheduler of a flash-based device is relatively close to that enforced by BFQ. In particular, it is close enough to let service guarantees be substantially preserved. Things change in an asymmetric scenario, i.e., if not every process has to receive the same fraction of the throughput. In this case, to guarantee the desired throughput distribution, the device must be prevented from prefetching requests. This is exactly what this patch does in asymmetric scenarios. Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente Signed-off-by: Arianna Avanzini --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index cddc8c6..b8ee88c 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -4411,15 +4411,25 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) * The value of the variable is computed considering that * idling is usually beneficial for the throughput if: * (a) the device is not NCQ-capable, or - * (b) regardless of the presence of NCQ, the request pattern - * for bfqq is I/O-bound (possible throughput losses - * caused by granting idling to seeky queues are mitigated - * by the fact that, in all scenarios where boosting - * throughput is the best thing to do, i.e., in all - * symmetric scenarios, only a minimal idle time is - * allowed to seeky queues). + * (b) regardless of the presence of NCQ, the device is rotational + * and the request pattern for bfqq is I/O-bound (possible + * throughput losses caused by granting idling to seeky queues + * are mitigated by the fact that, in all scenarios where + * boosting throughput is the best thing to do, i.e., in all + * symmetric scenarios, only a minimal idle time is allowed to + * seeky queues). + * + * Secondly, and in contrast to the above item (b), idling an + * NCQ-capable flash-based device would not boost the + * throughput even with intense I/O; rather it would lower + * the throughput in proportion to how fast the device + * is. Accordingly, the next variable is true if any of the + * above conditions (a) and (b) is true, and, in particular, + * happens to be false if bfqd is an NCQ-capable flash-based + * device. */ - idling_boosts_thr = !bfqd->hw_tag || bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); + idling_boosts_thr = !bfqd->hw_tag || + (!blk_queue_nonrot(bfqd->queue) && bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq)); /* * The value of the next variable, @@ -4491,38 +4501,54 @@ static bool bfq_bfqq_may_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) * receives its assigned fraction of the device throughput * (see [1] for details). * - * As for sub-condition (i), actually we check only whether - * bfqq is being weight-raised. In fact, if bfqq is not being - * weight-raised, we have that: - * - if the process associated to bfqq is not I/O-bound, then - * it is not either latency- or throughput-critical; therefore - * idling is not needed for bfqq; - * - if the process asociated to bfqq is I/O-bound, then - * idling is already granted to bfqq (see the comments on - * idling_boosts_thr). + * We address this issue by controlling, actually, only the + * symmetry sub-condition (i), i.e., provided that + * sub-condition (i) holds, idling is not performed, + * regardless of whether sub-condition (ii) holds. In other + * words, only if sub-condition (i) does not hold, then idling + * is allowed, and the device tends to be prevented from + * queueing many requests, possibly of several processes. The + * reason for not controlling also sub-condition (ii) is that, + * first, in the case of an HDD, idling is always performed + * for I/O-bound processes (see the comments on + * idling_boosts_thr above). Secondly, in the case of a + * flash-based device, we prefer however to privilege + * throughput (and idling lowers throughput for this type of + * devices), for the following reasons: + * 1) differently from HDDs, the service time of random + * requests is not orders of magnitudes lower than the service + * time of sequential requests; thus, even if processes doing + * sequential I/O get a preferential treatment with respect to + * others doing random I/O, the consequences are not as + * dramatic as with HDDs; + * 2) if a process doing random I/O does need strong + * throughput guarantees, it is hopefully already being + * weight-raised, or the user is likely to have assigned it a + * higher weight than the other processes (and thus + * sub-condition (i) is likely to be false, which triggers + * idling). * - * We do not check sub-condition (ii) at all, i.e., the next - * variable is true if and only if bfqq is being - * weight-raised. We do not need to control sub-condition (ii) - * for the following reason: - * - if bfqq is being weight-raised, then idling is already - * guaranteed to bfqq by sub-condition (i); - * - if bfqq is not being weight-raised, then idling is - * already guaranteed to bfqq (only) if it matters, i.e., if - * bfqq is associated to a currently I/O-bound process (see - * the above comment on sub-condition (i)). + * According to the above considerations, the next variable is + * true (only) if sub-condition (i) holds. To compute the + * value of this variable, we not only use the return value of + * the function bfq_symmetric_scenario(), but also check + * whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because + * bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also + * weight-raised queues (see comments to + * bfq_weights_tree_add()). * * As a side note, it is worth considering that the above * device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the * following unlucky scenario: if idling is (correctly) - * disabled in a time period during which the symmetry - * sub-condition holds, and hence the device is allowed to + * disabled in a time period during which all symmetry + * sub-conditions hold, and hence the device is allowed to * enqueue many requests, but at some later point in time some * sub-condition stops to hold, then it may become impossible * to let requests be served in the desired order until all * the requests already queued in the device have been served. */ - asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1; + asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 || + !bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd); /* * We have now all the components we need to compute the return