From patchwork Tue May 26 12:49:21 2015 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hanjun Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 48983 Return-Path: X-Original-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Delivered-To: linaro@patches.linaro.org Received: from mail-wi0-f200.google.com (mail-wi0-f200.google.com [209.85.212.200]) by ip-10-151-82-157.ec2.internal (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8942121F for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wifx6 with SMTP id x6sf10682403wif.1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:delivered-to:from:to:subject:date:message-id :in-reply-to:references:cc:precedence:list-id:list-unsubscribe :list-archive:list-post:list-help:list-subscribe:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender:errors-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:mailing-list; bh=BGZFjRm5/tM8RFugSNIF6LhM8c7uKbJlW7eQHQqEkKU=; b=bF5ZeDGbxnmfJFzW5E9lxJrOvukvNw8V1Z4dBqwn8uUhUcEh3d8wGS4jV39ckf1yh0 gMGcqvsfhda91w0i1uNq28zyTq++oo+plKHGZKqe4vD/QDVsRrkDjsCAkounj3Wv6bY9 +VZpJO0XyEc01qvGa0dpq28FVEkGLVng4QVc9e7NtbHzMcCWkNA30hj80u9e/u2Tx7xG 9NzPS6CPcAaQjRrCG3X6dp3KvStmsl+VKyFGF1jxaYnxTlz/awAjcz1+BM/OQSu5VuNI sdR+M18Ei3X/9RJOu7645rBaGDzqNLLlBNQ5xA8iePD6V/OGmDnh9bj/4uHk06SfeX/3 uc5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkoegpHPpg1ZxLmpKRo6cRUYVoBHWydhuKV/C42XEZZyeBcoy/oJoWCkCeNJnwkS0tFKphX X-Received: by 10.180.11.101 with SMTP id p5mr23402607wib.3.1432644960954; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: patchwork-forward@linaro.org Received: by 10.152.8.1 with SMTP id n1ls748558laa.87.gmail; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.152.164.193 with SMTP id ys1mr22348587lab.23.1432644960725; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com. [209.85.215.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x5si10887719laj.129.2015.05.26.05.56.00 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.47; Received: by lami4 with SMTP id i4so66961561lam.0 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.163.168 with SMTP id yj8mr22622044lbb.36.1432644960396; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:56:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-To: patchwork-forward@linaro.org X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org patchwork-forward@linaro.org Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.112.108.230 with SMTP id hn6csp2528213lbb; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.221.70 with SMTP id qc6mr48555773pbc.76.1432644958221; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2001:1868:205::9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y7si20861466par.175.2015.05.26.05.55.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 05:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org designates 2001:1868:205::9 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:1868:205::9; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YxEMa-00062z-2J; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:53:44 +0000 Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YxEK0-0004PU-Sz for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:51:06 +0000 Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so92232279pab.1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.136.42 with SMTP id px10mr49052972pbb.19.1432644643940; Tue, 26 May 2015 05:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([180.150.153.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e12sm13128278pap.40.2015.05.26.05.50.42 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 May 2015 05:50:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Hanjun Guo To: Bjorn Helgaas , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH 08/11] x86, pci, ecam: mmconfig_64.c becomes default implementation for ECAM driver. Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 20:49:21 +0800 Message-Id: <1432644564-24746-9-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> References: <1432644564-24746-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20150526_055105_036381_4ACD34DD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.56 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.7 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.220.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.220.49 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Liviu Dudau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Nowicki , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Hanjun Guo , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Mark Salter , Yijing Wang , Thomas Gleixner , Jiang Liu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patch=linaro.org@lists.infradead.org X-Removed-Original-Auth: Dkim didn't pass. X-Original-Sender: hanjun.guo@linaro.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=patch+caf_=patchwork-forward=linaro.org@linaro.org Mailing-list: list patchwork-forward@linaro.org; contact patchwork-forward+owners@linaro.org X-Google-Group-Id: 836684582541 From: Tomasz Nowicki Host which want to take advantage of ECAM generic goodness should select CONFIG_PCI_ECAM_GENERIC. Otherwise, machines like 32bits x86, are obligated to provide own low-level ECAM calls. Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/pci/Makefile | 4 +- arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c | 127 --------------------------------------------- drivers/pci/Kconfig | 3 ++ drivers/pci/ecam.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 4e3dcb3..87a6393 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ config X86 select X86_FEATURE_NAMES if PROC_FS select SRCU select HAVE_PCI_ECAM + select GENERIC_PCI_ECAM if X86_64 config INSTRUCTION_DECODER def_bool y diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile index 5c6fc35..efc193d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ obj-y := i386.o init.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_BIOS) += pcbios.o -obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += mmconfig_$(BITS).o direct.o mmconfig-shared.o +mmconfig-y := direct.o mmconfig-shared.o +mmconfig-$(CONFIG_X86_32) += mmconfig_32.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG) += $(mmconfig-y) obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT) += direct.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC) += olpc.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XEN) += xen.o diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c b/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c deleted file mode 100644 index fd857ea..0000000 --- a/arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,127 +0,0 @@ -/* - * mmconfig.c - Low-level direct PCI config space access via MMCONFIG - * - * This is an 64bit optimized version that always keeps the full mmconfig - * space mapped. This allows lockless config space operation. - */ - -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include -#include - -#define PREFIX "PCI: " - -static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); - - if (cfg && cfg->virt) - return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); - return NULL; -} - -int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) -{ - char __iomem *addr; - - /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ - if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { -err: *value = -1; - return -EINVAL; - } - - rcu_read_lock(); - addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); - if (!addr) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - goto err; - } - - *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return 0; -} - -int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, - unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) -{ - char __iomem *addr; - - /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ - if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) - return -EINVAL; - - rcu_read_lock(); - addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); - if (!addr) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - return -EINVAL; - } - - pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return 0; -} - -static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - void __iomem *addr; - u64 start, size; - int num_buses; - - start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); - num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; - size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); - addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); - if (addr) - addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); - return addr; -} - -int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; - - list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) - if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) { - pci_mmcfg_arch_free(); - return 0; - } - - return 1; -} - -void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void) -{ - struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; - - list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) - pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg); -} - -int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg); - if (!cfg->virt) { - pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res); - return -ENOMEM; - } - - return 0; -} - -void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) -{ - if (cfg && cfg->virt) { - iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus)); - cfg->virt = NULL; - } -} diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig index 90a5fb9..fae4aa7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ config PCI_ECAM config HAVE_PCI_ECAM bool +config GENERIC_PCI_ECAM + bool + config PCI_DEBUG bool "PCI Debugging" depends on PCI && DEBUG_KERNEL diff --git a/drivers/pci/ecam.c b/drivers/pci/ecam.c index c588234..796b6e7 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/ecam.c +++ b/drivers/pci/ecam.c @@ -23,6 +23,119 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(pci_mmcfg_lock); LIST_HEAD(pci_mmcfg_list); +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PCI_ECAM +static char __iomem *pci_dev_base(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg = pci_mmconfig_lookup(seg, bus); + + if (cfg && cfg->virt) + return cfg->virt + (PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(bus) | (devfn << 12)); + return NULL; +} + +int pci_mmcfg_read(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *value) +{ + char __iomem *addr; + + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) { +err: *value = -1; + return -EINVAL; + } + + rcu_read_lock(); + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); + if (!addr) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + goto err; + } + + *value = pci_mmio_read(len, addr + reg); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return 0; +} + +int pci_mmcfg_write(unsigned int seg, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 value) +{ + char __iomem *addr; + + /* Why do we have this when nobody checks it. How about a BUG()!? -AK */ + if (unlikely((bus > 255) || (devfn > 255) || (reg > 4095))) + return -EINVAL; + + rcu_read_lock(); + addr = pci_dev_base(seg, bus, devfn); + if (!addr) { + rcu_read_unlock(); + return -EINVAL; + } + + pci_mmio_write(len, addr + reg, value); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return 0; +} + +static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + void __iomem *addr; + u64 start, size; + int num_buses; + + start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); + num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1; + size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses); + addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size); + if (addr) + addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus); + return addr; +} + +int __init pci_mmcfg_arch_init(void) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; + + list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) + if (pci_mmcfg_arch_map(cfg)) { + pci_mmcfg_arch_free(); + return 0; + } + + return 1; +} + +void __init pci_mmcfg_arch_free(void) +{ + struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg; + + list_for_each_entry(cfg, &pci_mmcfg_list, list) + pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(cfg); +} + +int pci_mmcfg_arch_map(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + cfg->virt = mcfg_ioremap(cfg); + if (!cfg->virt) { + pr_err(PREFIX "can't map MMCONFIG at %pR\n", &cfg->res); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + return 0; +} + +void pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg) +{ + if (cfg && cfg->virt) { + iounmap(cfg->virt + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus)); + cfg->virt = NULL; + } +} +#endif + static u32 pci_mmconfig_generic_read(int len, void __iomem *addr) {