From patchwork Fri Jun 15 21:06:02 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Paul E. McKenney" X-Patchwork-Id: 9358 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork@peony.canonical.com Delivered-To: patchwork@peony.canonical.com Received: from fiordland.canonical.com (fiordland.canonical.com [91.189.94.145]) by peony.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB95B23E0C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f52.google.com (mail-yw0-f52.google.com [209.85.213.52]) by fiordland.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F7EA18402 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhpp61 with SMTP id p61so3107212yhp.11 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-forwarded-to:x-forwarded-for:delivered-to:received-spf:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references :x-content-scanned:x-cbid:x-gm-message-state; bh=Q6BH9z3GjX9M0oZvULr3Ssa31wqyKtTMhsGh8N3HcFs=; b=Jjvwm65xc4JjZjThe36bjCaFnwbNyimkUAJf2o1fZvVEyY/ZbC1ObEgfxprqnt9Y0l yIjnh3MzHe9C5bcJB1eOaGiJGIM9PKMr5y6in/yS2H7gv7wi+ZUZ6x1gqTXxvy1P4l3b OP+2mBsOqCPGH/sNRwIArY50oaBPRhQFK41D8iSXBwlUrDF8kKxecBpTG8UF7toWx2ky JBxBqpqAqKyT4VZbF5kfQQnNFang+P1+zriQ0dGv31wItN7X9TZ8nDbscv+UzuPyIN/I O6FITtBdC+GZ4wjuiBx7s6Cxh1QQdVwHGxR8upcfnjTgJVP0T7z0uaLOp8H7y7iPTLaB Xtsg== Received: by 10.50.195.234 with SMTP id ih10mr3366059igc.0.1339794535832; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-To: linaro-patchwork@canonical.com X-Forwarded-For: patch@linaro.org linaro-patchwork@canonical.com Delivered-To: patches@linaro.org Received: by 10.231.24.148 with SMTP id v20csp169792ibb; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.192.97 with SMTP id hf1mr7452067pbc.132.1339794535103; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com. [32.97.110.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qg1si1550447pbc.330.2012.06.15.14.08.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.150 as permitted sender) client-ip=32.97.110.150; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com designates 32.97.110.150 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from /spool/local by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:08:54 -0600 Received: from d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.177) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:08:52 -0600 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958C8C40003; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:07:22 +0000 (WET) Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q5FL6aXF200642; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:55 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q5FL6DKh002294; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:16 -0600 Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 ([9.47.24.152]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q5FL6CdY001965; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:06:12 -0600 Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W500 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72DEBE71A1; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, patches@linaro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] rcu: Move rcu_barrier_completion to rcu_state structure Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:02 -0700 Message-Id: <1339794370-28119-7-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.8 In-Reply-To: <1339794370-28119-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120615210550.GA27506@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1339794370-28119-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 12061521-3270-0000-0000-000007376143 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXzL2RVPZ0VGpHwgirEHrzUYGz5llzcW7J5FxAJpb2kEkqUNeNZu3NYABY5BJXo74hFR2E From: "Paul E. McKenney" In order to allow each RCU flavor to concurrently execute its rcu_barrier() function, it is necessary to move the relevant state to the rcu_state structure. This commit therefore moves the rcu_barrier_completion global variable to a new ->barrier_completion field in the rcu_state structure. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- kernel/rcutree.c | 9 ++++----- kernel/rcutree.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c index d363416..a946437 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c @@ -158,7 +158,6 @@ unsigned long rcutorture_vernum; /* State information for rcu_barrier() and friends. */ static DEFINE_MUTEX(rcu_barrier_mutex); -static struct completion rcu_barrier_completion; /* * Return true if an RCU grace period is in progress. The ACCESS_ONCE()s @@ -2272,7 +2271,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp) struct rcu_state *rsp = rdp->rsp; if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count)) - complete(&rcu_barrier_completion); + complete(&rsp->barrier_completion); } /* @@ -2322,7 +2321,7 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp) * 6. Both rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks are invoked, awakening * us -- but before CPU 1's orphaned callbacks are invoked!!! */ - init_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion); + init_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion); atomic_set(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count, 1); raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags); rsp->rcu_barrier_in_progress = current; @@ -2372,10 +2371,10 @@ static void _rcu_barrier(struct rcu_state *rsp) * CPU, and thus each counted, remove the initial count. */ if (atomic_dec_and_test(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count)) - complete(&rcu_barrier_completion); + complete(&rsp->barrier_completion); /* Wait for all rcu_barrier_callback() callbacks to be invoked. */ - wait_for_completion(&rcu_barrier_completion); + wait_for_completion(&rsp->barrier_completion); /* Other rcu_barrier() invocations can now safely proceed. */ mutex_unlock(&rcu_barrier_mutex); diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h index e7d29b7..56fb8d4 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ struct rcu_state { /* Task doing rcu_barrier(), */ /* or NULL if no barrier. */ atomic_t barrier_cpu_count; /* # CPUs waiting on. */ + struct completion barrier_completion; /* Wake at barrier end. */ raw_spinlock_t fqslock; /* Only one task forcing */ /* quiescent states. */ unsigned long jiffies_force_qs; /* Time at which to invoke */