| Message ID | cover.1505960744.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix y2038 issues for security/keys subsystem | expand |
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Baolin Wang wrote: > Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on > 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys > subsystem. > > Changes since v1: > - Add reviewed tag from Arnd. > - Drop Patch 3 which had been merged into kernel 4.14 by David. > > Baolin Wang (2): > security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t > security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct > key_preparsed_payload > > include/linux/key-type.h | 2 +- > include/linux/key.h | 7 ++++--- > security/keys/gc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > security/keys/internal.h | 8 ++++---- > security/keys/key.c | 27 ++++++++++----------------- > security/keys/keyring.c | 18 +++++++++--------- > security/keys/permission.c | 3 +-- > security/keys/proc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- > security/keys/process_keys.c | 2 +- > 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) David, have you taken these into your tree? I can apply them to mine if needed. -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > David, have you taken these into your tree? I can apply them to mine if > needed. I was intending to add them to my next tree for security/next. David
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, David Howells wrote: > James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > > > David, have you taken these into your tree? I can apply them to mine if > > needed. > > I was intending to add them to my next tree for security/next. Ok, please add Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> to these. Also, please use the new next-general branch for tracking & pull requests for the next kernel. -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
On 28 September 2017 at 17:48, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, David Howells wrote: > >> James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> wrote: >> >> > David, have you taken these into your tree? I can apply them to mine if >> > needed. >> >> I was intending to add them to my next tree for security/next. > > Ok, please add > Reviewed-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> > > to these. > > Also, please use the new next-general branch for tracking & pull requests > for the next kernel. Thanks James and David. -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
Since 'time_t', 'timeval' and 'timespec' types are not year 2038 safe on 32 bits system, this patchset tries to fix this issues for security/keys subsystem. Changes since v1: - Add reviewed tag from Arnd. - Drop Patch 3 which had been merged into kernel 4.14 by David. Baolin Wang (2): security: keys: Replace time_t/timespec with time64_t security: keys: Replace time_t with time64_t for struct key_preparsed_payload include/linux/key-type.h | 2 +- include/linux/key.h | 7 ++++--- security/keys/gc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- security/keys/internal.h | 8 ++++---- security/keys/key.c | 27 ++++++++++----------------- security/keys/keyring.c | 18 +++++++++--------- security/keys/permission.c | 3 +-- security/keys/proc.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- security/keys/process_keys.c | 2 +- 9 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5